Sometimes Doing the Right Thing Sucks: Frame Combinations and Multi-Fetal Pregnancy Reduction Decision Difficulty

Department of Health and Sports Sciences, College of Education and Human Development, University of Louisville, USA.
Social Science & Medicine (Impact Factor: 2.89). 01/2008; 65(11):2342-56. DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2007.06.026
Source: PubMed


Data are analyzed for 54 women who made an appointment with a North American Center specializing in multifetal pregnancy reduction (MFPR) to be counseled and possibly have a reduction. The impact on decision difficulty of combinations of three frames through which patients may understand and consider their options and use to justify their decisions are examined: a conceptional frame marked by a belief that life begins at conception; a medical frame marked by a belief in the statistics regarding risk and risk prevention through selective reduction; and a lifestyle frame marked by a belief that a balance of children and career has normative value. All data were gathered through semi-structured interviews and observation during the visit to the center over an average 2.5h period. Decision difficulty was indicated by self-assessed decision difficulty and by residual emotional turmoil surrounding the decision. Qualitative comparative analysis was used to analyze the impact of combinations of frames on decision difficulty. Separate analyses were conducted for those reducing only to three fetuses (or deciding not to reduce) and women who chose to reduce below three fetuses. Results indicated that for those with a non-intense conceptional frame, the decision was comparatively easy no matter whether the patients had high or low values of medical and lifestyle frames. For those with an intense conceptional frame, the decision was almost uniformly difficult, with the exception of those who chose to reduce only to three fetuses. Simplifying the results to their most parsimonious scenarios oversimplifies the results and precludes an understanding of how women can feel pulled in different directions by the dictates of the frames they hold. Variations in the characterization of intense medical frames, for example, can both pull toward reduction to two fetuses and neutralize shame and guilt by seeming to remove personal responsibility for the decision. We conclude that the examination of frame combinations is an important tool for understanding the way women carrying multiple fetuses negotiate their way through multi-fetal pregnancies, and that it may have more general relevance for understanding pregnancy decisions in context.

Download full-text


Available from: David Britt, Sep 30, 2015
1 Follower
61 Reads
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: A new Monte Carlo program has been developed for the simulation of the transport of optical photons over a rough planar surface. The new simulation employs a full three-dimensional model of a rough surface and addresses some of the limitations of the UNIFIED surface of UNDETECT2000 that is frequently used for the simulation of optical transport in PET detector crystals. A comparative study with DETECT2000 shows significant differences between the DETECT2000 UNIFIED model and our new surface model.
    Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record, 2003 IEEE; 11/2003
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: In 1978, the world's first "test-tube" baby was born via in vitro fertilization (IVF). The last thirty years have seen the rapid evolution of many other assisted reproductive technologies (ARTs), some simple variants of IVF, while others bridge the fields of assisted reproduction and human genomics. As ARTs have evolved over time, so have social, cultural, legal, and ethical responses to them. The major theme of this essay is the extent to which the ARTs are leading to culture change. ARTs ramify in many areas of social life, including the traditional anthropological domains of kinship, marriage and the family, gender, religion, and biomedicine. This review highlights the prolific scholarship of more than fifty anthropologists studying ARTs around the globe. Their research bespeaks both the destabilizing and generative impacts of ARTs at the interface between science and society.
    Annual Review of Anthropology 06/2008; 37(1). DOI:10.1146/annurev.anthro.37.081407.085230 · 2.55 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Multifetal pregnancies have skyrocketed over the past two decades as a consequence of infertility treatments. Multifetal pregnancy reduction has lowered the complications considerably. Here, we review the historical and current literature to determine reasonable statistics upon which to counsel patients Several papers in the past year have updated the database of outcomes, shown that prenatal diagnosis by fluorescent in-situ hybridization prior to reduction improves outcomes and examined the psychological and emotion frame through which patients view the circumstances and options available to them. Multifetal pregnancy reduction in experienced hands continues to dramatically improve the outcome of multiple pregnancies. The development of coping strategies for patients to deal with complex options and risks challenging their religious and other core beliefs now allows us to better counsel patients.
    Current Opinion in Obstetrics and Gynecology 08/2008; 20(4):386-93. DOI:10.1097/GCO.0b013e3283079b93 · 2.07 Impact Factor
Show more