Article

Increasing chlamydia positivity in women screened in family planning clinics: Do we know why?

Center for Health Training, Seattle, Washington 98101-1313, USA.
Sex Transm Dis (Impact Factor: 2.75). 02/2008; 35(1):47-52. DOI: 10.1097/OLQ.0b013e31813e0c26
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Following a 9-year 60% decline, chlamydia positivity increased 46% from 1997 through 2004 among young sexually active women screened in Region X family planning clinics. The objective of this analysis was to systematically examine the influences of risk factors, changing laboratory test methods, and interclinic variability on chlamydia positivity during this period.
We analyzed data from 520,512 chlamydia tests from women aged 15 to 24 years screened in 125 family planning clinics. Multivariate logistic regression modeling was used to adjust the annual risk of chlamydia for the demographic, clinical, and sexual risk behavior characteristics associated with infection and for the increasing use of more sensitive laboratory test methods. A generalized linear mixed model was used to adjust for interclinic variability.
We found a significant 5% annual increase in the risk of chlamydia even after adjusting for risk factors including laboratory test characteristics (odds ratio 1.05, 95% confidence interval: 1.04, 1.06). Variability among the clinics where screening occurred did not account for the increase.
Based on a review of all available data, we concluded that there was a true increase in chlamydia positivity over the 8-year period.

0 Bookmarks
 · 
85 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Chlamydia trachomatis is an obligate intracellular Gram negative bacterium, which infects mucosal epithelial cells (Schachter and Stephens 2008). Chlamydia display a unique two-stage life cycle consisting of an infectious stage and a replicative stage. During the infectious stage the organism assumes a metabolically inactive form, the elementary body , which can survive in the host extracellular environment. Upon entry into a host cell the elementary body transforms within a host cell vacuole into a metabolically active, replicating form, the reticulate body. Over a period of approximately 36–72 hours of growth and replication, the reticulate bodies transform into infectious elementary bodies, which are extruded from the cell and repeat the cycle by infecting additional cells of the same or a second host.
    12/2009: pages 357-380;
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Preventing sexually transmitted diseases (STD) such as Chlamydia trachomatis (CT) and Neisseria gonorrhoeae (GC) remains a public health challenge. The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force suggests STD screening among men will likely lead to a decrease in infection rates of women. However, innovative approaches are necessary to increase the traditionally low rates of male screening. The purpose of this study is to compare the acceptability and effectiveness of home-based versus clinic-based urine screening for CT and GC in men. We conducted a randomized clinical trial of 200 men aged 18 to 45 years who reside in St. Louis, MO. Men were enrolled via telephone and randomly assigned to receive a free urine CT/GC screening kit either in-person at the research clinic or to have it mailed to the participant's preferred address. Participants completed questionnaires at baseline and 10 to 12 weeks postenrollment. The primary outcome was whether STD screening was completed. Sixty percent (120/200) completed STD screening. Men assigned to home-based screening were 60% more likely to complete screening compared with clinic-based screening (72% vs. 48%, RRadj = 1.6, 95% CI = 1.3, 2.00). We identified 4 cases of CT or GC in the home-based group compared with 3 cases of CT in the clinic group. Men who completed screening were significantly more likely to be white, younger, and college educated. Home-based screening for CT and GC among men is more acceptable than clinic-based screening and resulted in higher rates of screening completion. Incorporating home-based methods as adjuncts to traditional STD screening options shows promise in improving STD screening rates in men.
    Sexually transmitted diseases 11/2012; 39(11):842-7. DOI:10.1097/OLQ.0b013e3182649165 · 2.58 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Expedited partner therapy (EPT), the practice of treating the sex partners of persons with sexually transmitted infections without their medical evaluation, increases partner treatment and decreases gonorrhea and chlamydia reinfection rates. We conducted a stepped-wedge, community-level randomized trial to determine whether a public health intervention promoting EPT could increase its use and decrease chlamydia test positivity and gonorrhea incidence in women. The trial randomly assigned local health jurisdictions (LHJs) in Washington State, US, into four study waves. Waves instituted the intervention in randomly assigned order at intervals of 6-8 mo. Of the state's 25 LHJs, 24 were eligible and 23 participated. Heterosexual individuals with gonorrhea or chlamydial infection were eligible for the intervention. The study made free patient-delivered partner therapy (PDPT) available to clinicians, and provided public health partner services based on clinician referral. The main study outcomes were chlamydia test positivity among women ages 14-25 y in 219 sentinel clinics, and incidence of reported gonorrhea in women, both measured at the community level. Receipt of PDPT from clinicians was evaluated among randomly selected patients. 23 and 22 LHJs provided data on gonorrhea and chlamydia outcomes, respectively. The intervention increased the percentage of persons receiving PDPT from clinicians (from 18% to 34%, p < 0.001) and the percentage receiving partner services (from 25% to 45%, p < 0.001). Chlamydia test positivity and gonorrhea incidence in women decreased over the study period, from 8.2% to 6.5% and from 59.6 to 26.4 per 100,000, respectively. After adjusting for temporal trends, the intervention was associated with an approximately 10% reduction in both chlamydia positivity and gonorrhea incidence, though the confidence bounds on these outcomes both crossed one (chlamydia positivity prevalence ratio = 0.89, 95% CI 0.77-1.04, p = 0.15; gonorrhea incidence rate ratio = 0.91, 95% CI .71-1.16, p = 0.45). Study findings were potentially limited by inadequate statistical power, by the institution of some aspects of the study intervention outside of the research randomization sequence, and by the fact that LHJs did not constitute truly isolated sexual networks. A public health intervention promoting the use of free PDPT substantially increased its use and may have resulted in decreased chlamydial and gonococcal infections at the population level. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01665690.
    PLoS Medicine 01/2015; 12(1):e1001777. DOI:10.1371/journal.pmed.1001777 · 14.00 Impact Factor

Preview

Download
1 Download