Article

FDG-PET improves accuracy in distinguishing frontotemporal dementia and Alzheimer's disease

University of California, Davis, Davis, California, United States
Brain (Impact Factor: 10.23). 11/2007; 130(Pt 10):2616-35. DOI: 10.1093/brain/awm177
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Distinguishing Alzheimer's disease (AD) and frontotemporal dementia (FTD) currently relies on a clinical history and examination, but positron emission tomography with [(18)F] fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG-PET) shows different patterns of hypometabolism in these disorders that might aid differential diagnosis. Six dementia experts with variable FDG-PET experience made independent, forced choice, diagnostic decisions in 45 patients with pathologically confirmed AD (n = 31) or FTD (n = 14) using five separate methods: (1) review of clinical summaries, (2) a diagnostic checklist alone, (3) summary and checklist, (4) transaxial FDG-PET scans and (5) FDG-PET stereotactic surface projection (SSP) metabolic and statistical maps. In addition, we evaluated the effect of the sequential review of a clinical summary followed by SSP. Visual interpretation of SSP images was superior to clinical assessment and had the best inter-rater reliability (mean kappa = 0.78) and diagnostic accuracy (89.6%). It also had the highest specificity (97.6%) and sensitivity (86%), and positive likelihood ratio for FTD (36.5). The addition of FDG-PET to clinical summaries increased diagnostic accuracy and confidence for both AD and FTD. It was particularly helpful when raters were uncertain in their clinical diagnosis. Visual interpretation of FDG-PET after brief training is more reliable and accurate in distinguishing FTD from AD than clinical methods alone. FDG-PET adds important information that appropriately increases diagnostic confidence, even among experienced dementia specialists.

Full-text

Available from: Raymond Scott Turner, May 30, 2015
1 Follower
 · 
186 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Group comparisons demonstrate greater visuospatial and memory deficits and temporoparietal-predominant degeneration on neuroimaging in patients with corticobasal syndrome (CBS) found to have Alzheimer's disease (AD) pathology versus those with underlying frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD). The value of these features in predicting underlying AD pathology in individual patients is unknown. The goal of this study is to evaluate the utility of modified clinical criteria and visual interpretations of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) for predicting amyloid deposition (as a surrogate of Alzheimer's disease neuropathology) in patients presenting with CBS. In total, 25 patients meeting CBS core criteria underwent amyloid (Pittsburgh compound B; PIB) PET scans. Clinical records, MRI, and FDG scans were reviewed blinded to PIB results. Modified clinical criteria were used to classify CBS patients as temporoparietal variant CBS (tpvCBS) or frontal variant CBS (fvCBS). MRI and FDG-PET were classified based on the predominant atrophy/hypometabolism pattern (frontal or temporoparietal). A total of 9 out of 13 patients classified as tpvCBS were PIB+, compared to 2out of 12 patients classified as fvCBS (P < 0.01, sensitivity 82%, specificity 71% for PIB+ status). Visual MRI reads had 73% sensitivity and 46% specificity for PIB+ status with moderate intra-rater reliability (Cohen's kappa = 0.42). Visual FDG reads had higher sensitivity (91%) for PIB+ status with perfect intra-rater reliability (kappa = 1.00), though specificity was low (50%). PIB results were confirmed in all 8 patients with available histopathology (3 PIB+ with confirmed AD, 5 PIB- with FTLD). Splitting CBS patients into frontal or temporoparietal clinical variants can help predict the likelihood of underlying AD, but criteria require further refinement. Temporoparietal-predominant neuroimaging patterns are sensitive but not specific for AD.
    Alzheimer's Research and Therapy 12/2015; 7(1):8. DOI:10.1186/s13195-014-0093-y · 3.50 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Positron emission tomography using amyloid binding ligands, labeled with carbon-11 and fluorine-18, (Amyloid PET) has been used to understand the relationship between amyloid deposition in the brain, neurodegeneration and the development of mild cognitive impairment and dementia. Structural MRI has been used to identify morphological changes in the brain which may relate to the cause(s) of cognitive impairment, including infarcts, space-occupying lesions, hydrocephalus and the patterns of atrophy which are characteristic of various neurodegenerative diseases. These two imaging biomarkers have also played an important role in revealing the sequence of cerebral amyloid deposition, neurodegeneration and cognitive impairment. Although there may not be a direct relationship between amyloid deposition and brain atrophy or cognitive deficits, the presence of both amyloid deposition on PET and neurodegeneration on MRI has been associated with accelerated cognitive decline. The main focus of this article is to summarize some of the insights gained using these two imaging methods individually and in combination to better understand the biological bases of normal aging and age-associated cognitive impairment.
    01/2015; DOI:10.1007/s40336-015-0110-6
  • Journal of Nuclear Medicine 02/2015; 56(3). DOI:10.2967/jnumed.114.151571 · 5.56 Impact Factor