Prone positioning for head and neck reconstructive surgery

Division of Otolaryngology, Department of Surgery, University of Utah, 50 N. Medical Drive, 3C-120, Salt Lake City, Utah 84107, USA.
Head & Neck (Impact Factor: 2.64). 11/2007; 29(11):1041-5. DOI: 10.1002/hed.20650
Source: PubMed


Certain head and neck surgical cases require the patient to be positioned prone. Such positioning carries with it an attendant subset of risks and complications not otherwise encountered in more traditional supine positioning. Gaining awareness of these risks and complications, and developing proactive positioning strategies, will enable the surgical team to position the patient optimally for the procedure and provide for every consideration of patient safety. This article consists of a specific literature review of those issues directly related to the anatomical and physiological concerns arising from prone positioning. Particular attention is paid to the cardiopulmonary, renal, ophthalmologic, and neurological vulnerabilities unique to this position. Proper planning by the surgical team and utilization of the correct equipment are a necessity. A tailored approach to the needs of the individual patient and an intimate awareness of the potential pitfalls will contribute to better outcomes when using the prone position.

42 Reads
  • Source
    The Open Anesthesiology Journal 09/2008; 2(1):55-57. DOI:10.2174/1874321800802010055
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Literature review of complications unrelated directly to surgical skills involved in spinal deformity surgery. Highlight complications associated with perioperative issues. Complications can arise from mundane events that arise during the operative experience, but are not directly related to surgical skills. Literature reviews that touches on the more common potential complication events that do not involve direct surgical expertise. The topics of positioning, nutrition, blood loss, comorbidities, OR time, and pulmonary and GI concerns are discussed as basics that could derail a surgical outcome even with an otherwise uneventful surgical technique. The need for vigilance is stressed and the nuances of understanding these are discussed. Mundane events can derail a perfectly executed surgical undertaking. Attention to detail, team work, close monitoring, and checklist type focus will help to improve, focus, and avoid these preventable complications that have nothing to do with direct surgical skills.
    Spine 12/2010; 35(25):2215-23. DOI:10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181fd591f · 2.30 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Surgery in the prone position is often a necessity when access to posterior anatomic structures is required. However, many complications are known to be associated with this type of surgery, as physiologic changes occur with increased pressure to anterior structures. While several studies have discussed postoperative vision loss, much fewer studies with lower levels of evidence have addressed other complications. A systematic literature review was conducted using 2 different databases, and 53 papers were regarded as appropriate for inclusion. Qualitative and quantitative analysis was performed. Thirteen complications were identified. Postoperative vision loss and cardiovascular complications, including hypovolemia and cardiac arrest, had the most number of studies and highest level of evidence. Careful planning for optimal positioning, padding, timing, as well as increased vigilance are evidence-based recommendations where operative prone positioning is required.
    International surgery 02/2015; 100(2):292-303. DOI:10.9738/INTSURG-D-13-00256.1 · 0.47 Impact Factor


42 Reads
Available from