Impact of managed care on physicians' decisions to manipulate reimbursement rules: an explanatory model.

WellStar College of Health and Human Services, Kennesaw State University, Kennesaw, GA 30144-5591, USA.
Journal of Health Services Research & Policy (Impact Factor: 1.73). 08/2007; 12(3):147-52. DOI: 10.1258/135581907781543102
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT To develop and test an explanatory model of the impact of managed care on physicians' decisions to manipulate reimbursement rules for patients.
A self-administered mailed questionnaire of a national random sample of 1124 practicing physicians in the USA. Structural equation modelling was used. The main outcome measure assessed whether or not physicians had manipulated reimbursement rules (such as exaggerated the severity of patients conditions, changed billing diagnoses, or reported signs or symptoms that the patients did not have) to help patients secure coverage for needed treatment or services.
The response rate was 64% (n = 720). Physicians' decisions to manipulate reimbursement rules for patients are directly driven not only by ethical beliefs about gaming the system but also by requests from patients, the perception of insufficient time to deliver care, and the proportion of Medicaid patients. Covert advocacy is also the indirect result of utilization review hassles, primary care specialty, and practice environment.
Managed care is not just a set of rules that physicians choose to follow or disobey, but an environment of competing pressures from patients, purchasers, and high workload. Reimbursement manipulation is a response to that environment, rather than simply a reflection of individual physicians' values.

Download full-text


Available from: Jonathan B Vangeest, May 30, 2014
29 Reads
  • Source
    Canadian Medical Association Journal 04/2008; 178(6):723-4. DOI:10.1503/cmaj.080136 · 5.96 Impact Factor
  • The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology 03/2010; 125(4):939-41. DOI:10.1016/j.jaci.2009.12.988 · 11.48 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Over the past two decades, the use of antidepressant medications has grown to the point that they are now the third most commonly prescribed class of medications in the United States. Much of this growth has been driven by a substantial increase in antidepressant prescriptions by nonpsychiatrist providers without an accompanying psychiatric diagnosis. Our analysis found that between 1996 and 2007, the proportion of visits at which antidepressants were prescribed but no psychiatric diagnoses were noted increased from 59.5 percent to 72.7 percent. These results do not clearly indicate a rise in inappropriate antidepressant use, but they highlight the need to gain a deeper understanding of the factors driving this national trend and to develop effective policy responses. To the extent that antidepressants are being prescribed for uses not supported by clinical evidence, there may be a need to improve providers' prescribing practices, revamp drug formularies, or vigorously pursue implementation of broad reforms of the health care system that will increase communication between primary care providers and mental health specialists.
    Health Affairs 08/2011; 30(8):1434-42. DOI:10.1377/hlthaff.2010.1024 · 4.97 Impact Factor
Show more