Disparities in obesity rates: analysis by ZIP code area.

University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Social Science [?] Medicine (Impact Factor: 2.56). 01/2008; 65(12):2458-63. DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2007.07.001
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Obesity in the United States has been linked to individual income and education. Less is known about its geographic distribution. The goal of this study was to determine whether obesity rates in King County, Washington State, at the ZIP code scale were associated with area-based measures of socioeconomic status and wealth. Data from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System were analyzed. At the ZIP code scale, crude obesity rates varied six-fold. In a model adjusting for covariates and spatial dependence, property values were the strongest predictor of the area-based smoothed obesity prevalence. Geocoding of health data provides new insights into the nature of social determinants of health. Disparities in obesity rates by ZIP code area were greater than disparities associated with individual income or race/ethnicity.

  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Community development seeks to address the consequences of poverty through initiatives that improve housing, economic opportunity, service availability, and community capacity. There is growing recognition that the fields of community development and public health have much in common with regard to target populations, objectives, and challenges. Individual and neighborhood-level poverty are well-documented risk factors for illness and premature death. But relatively few developers systematically analyze how their projects could affect the health of the target community. Tools and metrics that facilitate incorporating health into planning, financing, and implementing new community development projects and programs will foster more widespread and productive collaboration between these two fields. We propose a simple framework to facilitate the identification and measurement of potential health effects, actions to optimize anticipated positive impacts, and strategies to mitigate potential negative impacts. The framework is drawn from an analysis of health impact assessments and includes four elements: identifying the health status of the population served, considering neighborhood-level influences on health, building design features important to health, and incorporating community engagement and capacity-building activities into the initiative.
    Health Affairs 11/2014; 33(11):1939-47. DOI:10.1377/hlthaff.2014.0632 · 4.32 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This paper examines spatial pattern of adult obesity in Canada from 2000/01 to 2009/10, and analyzes factors associated with obesity and body mass index (BMI). The analysis is based on a panel data set constructed at the health region (HR) level using five confidential Canadian Community Health Surveys. We found that obesity rates are not distributed randomly across HRs in Canada (Moran’s I, 2000/01: 0.501 and 2009/10: 0.659 [p<0.001]). Therefore, accounting for the spatial pattern of obesity was necessary in order to obtain reliable parameter estimates from regression analyses. We estimated the random- and fixed-effects specifications for the spatial autoregressive and spatial error models. The Hausman specification tests suggested that the fixed- effects models were preferred to that of the random-effects models. The results showed that the proportions of immigrants and homeowners are inversely related to BMI and obesity, while household income, fruits & vegetables consumption, physical activity and smoking are negatively related to BMI. These findings highlight the importance of socioeconomic and behavioural factors affecting adult obesity in Canada even after spatial heterogeneity was accounted for. Thus, a comprehensive and multi-faceted strategy is required to combat adult obesity in Canada.
    Applied Spatial Analysis and Policy 04/2015; DOI:10.1007/s12061-015-9151-5
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This paper aggregates data from seven different sources to examine low-density lipoprotein cholesterol or LDL-C testing rates for the 65-75 year age group with diagnosed diabetes in 82 Mississippi counties. Besides demonstrating a creative way to expand the Dartmouth Atlas dataset, this is among a handful of studies to spatially analyze racial disparities in health services utilization for a population fully covered by Medicare. This is an important area to investigate given the continued emphasis on eliminating health disparities and improving access to care, as put forth by the Department of Health and Human Services in Healthy People 2020. More specifically, diabetes is the seventh leading cause of death and a contributing factor in a number of comorbidities in the United States (and globally). Although this chronic illness can occur at any age, there is greater prevalence among senior adults (i.e., 65 years and older) and non-Hispanic Blacks. The outlook is particularly grim for older Blacks in Mississippi, a state in the southeast US. Mississippi ranks #1 with approximately 11.3% of the state's population reporting diagnosed diabetes. This percentage would be higher if one accounts for undiagnosed cases. Results from this study show older Blacks continue to utilize lower levels of care for diabetes management despite Medicare enrollment. Nevertheless, improvements in population health can be achieved by understanding geographic differences. By recognizing spatial patterns, health policy instruments can reach targeted groups in a more effective manner. For example, deficit prone states such as Mississippi can improve population health by operating clinics/facilities that serve the needs of older diabetic Blacks in contiguous counties, limiting access to fast foods, and increasing the supply of health workers in shortage areas.
    Applied Geography 12/2014; 55. DOI:10.1016/j.apgeog.2014.09.017 · 3.08 Impact Factor