Article

Propofol-ketamine vs propofol-fentanyl for sedation during pediatric upper gastrointestinal endoscopy.

Department of Anesthesiology, Erciyes University School of Medicine, Kayseri, Turkey.
Pediatric Anesthesia (Impact Factor: 2.44). 11/2007; 17(10):983-8. DOI: 10.1111/j.1460-9592.2007.02206.x
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The aim of this study was to compare the clinical efficacy and safety of propofol-ketamine with propofol-fentanyl in pediatric patients undergoing diagnostic upper gastrointestinal endoscopy (UGIE).
This was a prospective, randomized, double blinded comparison of propofol-ketamine with propofol-fentanyl for sedation in patients undergoing elective UGIE. Ninety ASA I-II, aged 1 to 16-year-old patients were included in the study. Heart rate (HR), systolic arterial pressure, peripheral oxygen saturation, respiratory rate (RR) and Ramsey sedation scores of all patients were recorded perioperatively. Patients were randomly assigned to receive either propofol-ketamine (PK; n = 46) or propofol-fentanyl (PF; n = 44). PK group received 1 mg x kg(-1) ketamine + 1.2 mg x kg(-1) propofol, and PF group received 1 microg x kg(-1) fentanyl + 1.2 mg x kg(-1) propofol for sedation induction. Additional propofol (0.5-1 mg x kg(-1)) was administered when a patient showed discomfort in either group.
The number of patients who needed additional propofol in the first minute after sedation induction was eight in Group PK (17%), and 22 in Group PF (50%) (P < 0.01) and those who did not need additional propofol throughout the endoscopy were 14 in Group PK (30%) and three in Group PF (7%) (P < 0.01). HR and RR values after induction in Group PF were significantly lower than Group PK (P < 0.01).
Both PK and PF combinations provided effective sedation in pediatric patients undergoing UGIE, but the PK combination resulted in stable hemodynamics and deeper sedation though more side effects.

2 Bookmarks
 · 
274 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Aim: To compare propofol combinations with low induction doses of remifentanil and fentanyl in respect to the complication frequency and efficiency in ease of procedure in children undergoing esophagogastroduodenoscopy. Materials and methods: Sixty-four patients, aged 3–14 years and undergoing elective esophagogastroduodenoscopy, were included in the study. The patients received an induction dose of 0.25 μg kg–1 remifentanil and 2 mg kg–1 propofol (group R), or 0.5 μg kg–1 fentanyl and 2 mg kg–1 propofol (group F) before the procedure. The procedure began with a sedation score of ≥5. Hemodynamic values, movement, ease and duration of the procedure, the time to awakening, and any requirement for additional doses of propofol/opioids and adverse events were recorded. Results: Although frequency of apnea after induction was higher and the duration of apnea was longer in group R, during procedure and postprocedure follow-up, there were no apnea episodes in either group (P < 0.05, P > 0.05). Intraoperative respiratory rate, time to eye opening, opioid consumption, and duration of recovery were significantly shorter in group R (P < 0.05). Conclusion: Remifentanil, when combined with propofol, can provide as efficient and safe anesthesia as fentanyl propofol combination for procedures like esophagogastroduodenoscopy.
    Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences 08/2013; 43. · 0.45 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Interventional cardiac catheterization in children and adolescents is traditionally performed with the patient under general anesthesia and endotracheal intubation. However, percutaneous closure of atrial septum defect (ASD) without general anaesthesia is currently being attempted in a growing number of children. The study objective was to evaluate the success and complication rate of percutaneous ASD closure in spontaneously breathing children under deep sedation. Retrospective single centre cohort study of consecutive children undergoing percutaneous ASD closure at a tertiary care pediatric cardiology centre. Transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) and percutaneous ASD closure were performed with the patient under deep sedation with intravenous bolus of midazolam and ketamine for induction and propofol continuous infusion for maintenance of sedation in spontaneously breathing children. One hundred and ninety-seven patients (median age 6.1 years [minimum 0.5; maximum 18.8]) underwent TEE and ASD balloon sizing. Percutaneous ASD closure was attempted in 174 patients (88 %), and device implantation was performed successfully in 92 %. To achieve sufficient deep sedation, patients received a median ketamine dose of 2.7 mg/kg (0.3; 7) followed by a median propofol continuous infusion rate of 5 mg/kg/h (1.1; 10.7). There were no major cardiorespiratory complications associated with deep sedation, and only two patients (1 %) required endotracheal intubation due to bronchial obstruction immediately after induction of sedation. Seventeen patients (8 %) had minor respiratory complications and required frequent oral suctioning or temporary bag-mask ventilation. TEE and percutaneous ASD closure can be performed safely and successfully under deep sedation in spontaneously breathing children of all ages.
    Pediatric Cardiology 07/2013; · 1.20 Impact Factor

Full-text

View
121 Downloads
Available from
May 26, 2014