Article

Seeing Is Believing: The Effect of Brain Images on Judgments of Scientific Reasoning

Department of Psychology, Colorado State University, Campus Box 1876, Fort Collins, CO 80523-1876, USA.
Cognition (Impact Factor: 3.63). 05/2008; 107(1):343-52. DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2007.07.017
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Brain images are believed to have a particularly persuasive influence on the public perception of research on cognition. Three experiments are reported showing that presenting brain images with articles summarizing cognitive neuroscience research resulted in higher ratings of scientific reasoning for arguments made in those articles, as compared to articles accompanied by bar graphs, a topographical map of brain activation, or no image. These data lend support to the notion that part of the fascination, and the credibility, of brain imaging research lies in the persuasive power of the actual brain images themselves. We argue that brain images are influential because they provide a physical basis for abstract cognitive processes, appealing to people's affinity for reductionistic explanations of cognitive phenomena.

3 Followers
 · 
355 Views
 · 
24 Downloads
  • Source
    • "We contend that pairing texts and graphics together does not always provide an additive effect, and the addition of separate models of text and graphics processing is insufficient to predict the outcome of the combination of both referents. The spatial arrangement in which information is displayed can subtly communicate relationships among or between that information, (Hegarty, 2011; McCabe & Castel, 2008) and displays effective for one task may be ineffective for another (Hegarty, 2011; Liben, 2001; Schnotz, Bannert, & Seufert, 2002; Tversky, 2001; Tversky, Morrison, & Betrancourt, 2002). Thus, we propose that the synergistic effect resulting from combining texts and graphics cannot be satisfactorily predicted by merely adding a model of text-processing (Kintsch, 1992) to a model of graphic-processing (Hegarty, 2011). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The present investigation was designed to determine the effects of metaphorical graphics on learning from an expository text. The graphics were designed to function as a metaphorical representations of the semantic elements inherent in the passage, with the level of correspondence between the graphics and text varied as weak or strong. In study 1, participants (N = 168) were randomly assigned to one of three graphic/text conditions (strong, weak, or none). Learning was measured immediately after the presentation of learning materials and again a week later. In study 2, participants (N = 98) followed the same procedure as study 1, but they were allowed to view the experimental materials online, rather than in a lab setting. Results from both studies revealed that, while decorative graphics may appear benign or detrimental to learning outcomes immediately after exposure under experimental lab conditions, further analysis indicated that graphics designed to metaphorically correspond to text content functioned to preserve learning across a one-week delay. In addition, when participants viewed the materials online, the decorative graphics improved learning, not just prevented decay. The online effect was mediated by the level of metaphorical correspondence between the passage and the graphic.
    Learning and Instruction 08/2015; 39:194-205. DOI:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2015.07.004 · 3.73 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "enthralled by the seemingly unshakable impression that fMRI depictions carry tremendous significance (McCabe and Castel, 2008; Racine et al., 2005). Laypeople coming into contact with the neuroimaging technology are often extremely fascinated and captivated by it. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The concept of a socially extended mind suggests that our cognitive processes are extended not simply by the various tools and technologies we use, but by other minds in our intersubjective interactions and, more systematically, by institutions that, like tools and technologies, enable and sometimes constitute our cognitive processes. In this article we explore the potential of this concept to facilitate the development of a critical neuroscience. We explicate the concept of cognitive institution and suggest that science itself is a good example. Science, through various practices and rules, shapes our cognitive activity so as to constitute a certain type of knowledge, packaged with relevant skills and techniques. To develop this example, we focus on neuroscience, its cultural impact, and the various institutional entanglements that complicate its influence on reframing conceptions of self and subjectivity, and on defining what questions count as important and what kind of answers will be valued.
    Theory Culture &amp Society 01/2015; 32(1):33-59. DOI:10.1177/0263276414551996 · 1.77 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "Finally, policy makers need to address the use of biological evidence in court. Many judges and jurors are not educated on these methods and, even if they are, can fall victim to the convincing nature of seemingly definitive biological data (McCabe & Castel, 2008). Policy that ensures biological data appears alongside personality data (which increases mind attribution) may mitigate the outsized effects of biological data on legal reasoning, but future research will be necessary to determine the effectiveness of this approach. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: People spontaneously think about the minds of other people, aiding social interaction. Such cognitions recognize the other person as a full human being, deserving empathy and protection. Social psychology and neuroscience evidence also demonstrate the opposite—dehumanized perception—a failure to spontaneously think about the minds of others. Although initial research focused on extreme out-groups (e.g., the homeless) as targets of dehumanized perception, more recent research documents dehumanized perception toward ordinary people in everyday contexts. Therefore, dehumanized perception is not reserved only for extreme out-groups, or committed by sociopaths; any person can be dehumanized, and some social contexts enable any person to dehumanize others. For instance, people dehumanize others in economic contexts where people are traded as commodities (such as labor markets), when expecting to interact with someone suffering, and when thinking about an out-group previously oppressed by the in-group. Because policy makers shape the social context, they can promote dehumanized perception or not.
    10/2014; 1(1):144-150. DOI:10.1177/2372732214548593
Show more

Preview

Download
24 Downloads
Available from