Article

Complications of labor induction among multiparous women in a community-based hospital system

Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology , University of California, Irvine, Irvine, California, United States
American journal of obstetrics and gynecology (Impact Factor: 3.97). 10/2007; 197(3):241.e1-7; discussion 322-3, e1-4. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2006.12.027
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The purpose of this study was to examine complications of labor induction compared to spontaneous labor in multiparas.
This was a retrospective cohort study of multiparous women with live, singleton pregnancies at term, who had no contraindications to labor or labor induction. Cesarean delivery was the primary outcome.
Of the study subjects, 7208 experienced spontaneous labor, 2190 underwent labor induction with oxytocin, and 239 underwent labor induction requiring cervical ripening agents. Oxytocin-induced multiparas were 37% more likely to require cesarean compared to those with spontaneous labor (OR, 1.37; 95% CI, 1.10-1.71) and nearly 3 times more likely to undergo cesarean when cervical ripening agents were used (OR, 2.82; 95% CI, 1.84-4.53). Women requiring cervical ripening were also 10 times more likely to spend more than 12 hours in labor than those with spontaneous labor.
Multiparas undergoing labor induction are at increased risk for obstetric complications compared to spontaneous labor.

Full-text

Available from: Deborah A Wing, Jun 03, 2015
0 Followers
 · 
275 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Abstract Objective: To compare the adverse neonatal and maternal outcomes after medically indicated and elective labor induction. Both induction groups were also compared to women with spontaneous onset of labor. Methods: Retrospective cohort study of 13'971 women with live, cephalic singleton pregnancies who delivered at term (from 1997 to 2007). Adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes were compared between women who underwent an induction of labor in the presence and absence of standard medical indications. Results: Among 5'090 patients with induced labor, 2'059 (40.5%) underwent elective labor inductions, defined as inductions without any medical or obstetrical indication. Risks of caesarean or instrumental delivery, postpartum hemorrhage >500 ml, prolonged maternal hospitalization >6 days, Apgar<7 at 5 minutes of life, arterial umbilical cord pH<7.1, admission in neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) and prolonged NICU hospitalization >7 days were similar between nulliparous who underwent elective and medical labor induction. Similar results were obtained for multiparous. All the above mentioned risks, but the Apgar<7 at 5 minutes of life, were significantly increased after induction in comparison to spontaneous labor. Conclusion: Elective induction of labor carries similar obstetrical and neonatal risks as a medically indicated labor induction. Thus, elective induction of labor should be strongly discouraged.
    The journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine: the official journal of the European Association of Perinatal Medicine, the Federation of Asia and Oceania Perinatal Societies, the International Society of Perinatal Obstetricians 04/2013; DOI:10.3109/14767058.2013.795533 · 1.21 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Abstract OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate whether induction of labor in twin pregnancies is associated with higher rates of maternal complications as compared to singletons. METHODS: A retrospective population-based study was conducted to compare maternal complications following induction of labor in twin pregnancies and singletons at Soroka University Medical Center, Be'er-Sheva, Israel, between 1988 and 2010. Stratified analysis using a multiple logistic regression model was performed to control for confounders. RESULTS: The study population included 25,913 patients following induction of labor, of these 191 (0.73%) were in twin pregnancies. Induction of labor in twin pregnancies was not associated with adverse maternal outcomes such as cervical tears, 3(rd) degree perineal tears, uterine rupture, peripartum hysterectomy, post-partum hemorrhage or retained placenta. However, labor induction in twins was significantly associated with cesarean deliveries (31.2% vs. 17.1%; P<0.001. Using a multivariable analysis controlling for confounders, induction at twins was an independent risk factor for cesarean delivery (adjusted OR= 2.2, 95% CI 1.7-2.7, P<0.001). CONCLUSION: Induction of labor in twin pregnancies does not increase the risk for maternal complications. However, it is an independent risk factor for cesarean delivery.
    The journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine: the official journal of the European Association of Perinatal Medicine, the Federation of Asia and Oceania Perinatal Societies, the International Society of Perinatal Obstetricians 05/2013; DOI:10.3109/14767058.2013.804047 · 1.21 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: BackgroundThere is a well-known relationship between induced labour and caesarean rates. However, it remains unknown whether this relationship reflects the impact of more complex obstetric conditions or the variability in obstetric practices. We sought to quantify the independent role of the hospital as a variable that can influence the occurrence of caesarean section after induced labour.MethodsAs part of the Portuguese Generation XXI birth cohort, we evaluated 2041 consecutive women who underwent singleton pregnancies with labour induction, at five public level III obstetric units (April 2005-August 2006). The indications for induction were classified according to the guidelines of the American and the Royal Colleges of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Poisson regression models were adjusted to estimate the association between the hospital and surgical delivery after induction. Crude and adjusted prevalence ratios (PR) and a 95% confidence interval (95% CI) were computed.ResultsThe proportion of women who were induced without formal clinical indications varied among hospitals from 20.3% to 45.5% (p < 0.001). After adjusting for confounders, the risk of undergoing a caesarean section after induced labour remained significantly different between the hospitals, for the cases in which there was no evident indication for induction [the highest PR reaching 1.86 (95% CI, 1.23–2.82)] and also when at least one such indication was present [1.53 (95% CI, 1.12–2.10)]. This pattern was also observed among the primiparous cephalic term induced women [the highest PR reaching 2.06 (95% CI, 1.23–2.82) when there was no evident indication for induction and 1.61 (95% CI, 1.11–2.34) when at least one such indication was present].ConclusionsCaesarean section after induced labour varied significantly across hospitals where similar outcomes were expected. The effect was more evident when the induction was not based on the unequivocal presence of commonly accepted indications.
    BMC Research Notes 05/2013; 6(1):214. DOI:10.1186/1756-0500-6-214