Article

Pharmacological interventions for acute bipolar mania: A systematic review of randomized placebo-controlled trials

Medical Research Matters, Eynsham, UK.
Bipolar Disorders (Impact Factor: 4.89). 09/2007; 9(6):551-60. DOI: 10.1111/j.1399-5618.2007.00468.x
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized, placebo-controlled trials in acute bipolar mania to summarize available data on drug treatment of mania.
We included trials of medications licensed in the USA or UK for the treatment of any phase of bipolar disorder. Outcomes investigated were changes in mania scores, attrition, extrapyramidal effects and weight change. Data were combined through meta-analyses.
We included 13 studies (involving 3,089 subjects) and identified 2 studies for each of the following medications: carbamazepine, haloperidol, lithium, olanzapine, quetiapine, risperidone, valproate semisodium and aripiprazole. All drugs showed significant benefit compared with placebo for reduction in mania scores. Compared with placebo, for all antipsychotics pooled, response to treatment (> or =50% reduction in Young Mania Rating Scale scores) was increased more than 1.7 times [relative risk (RR) = 1.74, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.54, 1.96]; for all mood stabilizers pooled, response to treatment was doubled (RR 2.01, 95% CI = 1.66, 2.43). Overall withdrawals were 34% fewer (24-43%) with antipsychotics, and 26% fewer (10-39%) with mood stabilizers. However, for carbamazepine, aripiprazole and lithium an increase in risk of withdrawal could not be excluded. Small but significant increases in extrapyramidal side effects occurred with risperidone and aripiprazole.
Antipsychotics and mood stabilizers are significantly more effective than placebo for the treatment of acute mania. Their effect sizes are similar. Small differences between effect sizes may be due to differences in the patients included in the studies or to chance. Carbamazepine and lithium may be more poorly tolerated, and antipsychotics cause more extrapyramidal side effects.

Download full-text

Full-text

Available from: Victoria R Cornelius, Sep 01, 2015
1 Follower
 · 
248 Views
 · 
190 Downloads
  • Source
    • "In a recent meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies comparing one active antimanic drug with another one or with placebo including combination and augmentation studies, risperidone, olanzapine, and haloperidol have shown the best efficacy profile in the treatment of acute mania while lamotrigine, topiramate, and gabapentin were not significantly better than placebo (Cipriani et al., 2011). In another meta-analysis of co-therapy and monotherapy in acute bipolar mania, Smith et al. (2007) analyzed 8 RCTs including 1124 patients and found that significant reductions in mania (>50% reduction from baseline at YMRS scores) were shown for haloperidol, olanzapine, risperidone, and quetiapine as co-therapy combined with a mood stabilizer even if combination was less well tolerated as compared with monotherapy. Goodwin et al. (2009), during the ECNP consensus meeting, suggested that conventional two-arm trial designs could benefit form adding a third antipsychotic monotherapy arm in order to improve data from studies which compare and quantify the efficacy of antipsychotics in monotherapy or in combination. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Bipolar affective disorder is a serious mental disease associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Good-quality research available to guide treatment strategies remains insufficient, particularly with regard to manic or hypomanic episodes. A critical review of the various stages of mania might be helpful for pharmamaceutical companies and investigators as a prerequisite for the clinical evaluation of potential antimanic properties of medications. The main difficulty remains the comparison between antipsychotics and mood stabilizers such as lithium (with equal efficacy in the acute phase and the prevention of recurrent manic episodes) No consensus has been reached with regard to the treatment of bouts of acute mania in various parts of the world. Controlled clinical trials have, at last, provided irrefutable evidence of the activity of lithium, which has long been used alone, as well asthat of divalproate or its derivatives and, to a lesser extent, carbamazepine. The new antipsychotic agents have more recently established their efficacy, especially aripiprazole, asenapine, quetiapine; olanzapine, risperidone and ziprazidone. It is paradoxical to note that, in Europe, haloperidol is still the reference substance used in clinical trials despite the fact that it is not officially indicated in the treatment of mania. In the USA, lithium, divalproate or antipsychotics can be prescribed as first-line treatment. In Europe, lithium remains the first-line medication, whereas divalproate and atypical antipsychotic agents are used only as second-line therapy. Although both types of medication (antipsychotics, normothymic agents and/or anticonvulsants) have proved to be clinically effective in the management of mania by reducing the mania scores overall, the same does not apply, however, to all symptoms of mania. Factorial approaches to mania have all shown that since there are several clinical forms of mania, several lines of manic symptoms can be identified. Antipsy
    Frontiers in Pharmacology 01/2013; 4:4. DOI:10.3389/fphar.2013.00004 · 3.80 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "While older clinical trials for mania medications were conducted with less rigorous methodological requirements and did not necessarily satisfy current scientific criteria (comparative, randomized, doubleblind design), more recent studies have validated the efficacy of a variety of anti-manic drugs (Grunze et al., 2009). It is relevant to note, however, that treatment efficacy is most commonly defined as a 50% improvement on subjective measures such as the Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) (Smith et al., 2007), while objective quantification of manic symptoms such as motor hyperactivity is rarely assessed (Henry et al., 2010). Recent investigations indicate that genetic variation in BD could also play a important role in treatment effects; the response to lithium therapy may relate to variants in genes that code for the serotonin transporter, glycogen synthase kinase 3 (GSK-3) and inositol monophosphatase (IMPase) proteins (Cruceanu et al., 2006). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Mania has long been recognized as aberrant behaviour indicative of mental illness. Manic states include a variety of complex and multifaceted symptoms that challenge clear clinical distinctions. Symptoms include over-activity, hypersexuality, irritability and reduced need for sleep, with cognitive deficits recently linked to functional outcome. Current treatments have arisen through serendipity or from other disorders. Hence, treatments are not efficacious for all patients, and there is an urgent need to develop targeted therapeutics. Part of the drug discovery process is the assessment of therapeutics in animal models. Here we review pharmacological, environmental and genetic manipulations developed to test the efficacy of therapeutics in animal models of mania. The merits of these models are discussed in terms of the manipulation used and the facet of mania measured. Moreover, the predictive validity of these models is discussed in the context of differentiating drugs that succeed or fail to meet criteria as approved mania treatments. The multifaceted symptomatology of mania has not been reflected in the majority of animal models, where locomotor activity remains the primary measure. This approach has resulted in numerous false positives for putative treatments. Recent work highlights the need to utilize multivariate strategies to enable comprehensive assessment of affective and cognitive dysfunction. Advances in therapeutic treatment may depend on novel models developed with an integrated approach that includes: (i) a comprehensive battery of tests for different aspects of mania, (ii) utilization of genetic information to establish aetiological validity and (iii) objective quantification of patient behaviour with translational cross-species paradigms.
    British Journal of Pharmacology 03/2011; 164(4):1263-84. DOI:10.1111/j.1476-5381.2011.01318.x · 4.99 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "La littérature scientifique recommande les associations telles que le lithium ou le divalproate avec un antipsychotique atypique [37] [38]. Si un antipsychotique n'est pas déjà utilisé, les guidelines recommandent l'adjonction d'un antipsychotique quand la symptomatologie du patient comprend des signes psychotiques [39]. La HAS précise que d'autres traitements peuvent être envisagés en deuxième intention pour les épisodes aigus, maniaques ou mixtes, hypomaniaques : les anticonvulsivants tels que la carbamazépine, le valpromide, l'oxcarbazépine (hors AMM), les neuroleptiques conventionnels (hors AMM), d'autres antipsychotiques atypiques tels que l'amisulpride, la clozapine (hors AMM). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Management of bipolar disorder has undergone many revisions in recent years as new agents and treatments have been developed and studied with variable success. In conjunction with the advent of novel therapies and indications, there has been an increase in the understanding of the phenomenology and neurobiology of bipolar disorder that has made the classification and management of the illness necessarily more sophisticated. However, there remains a significant delay of 8 years in detecting and diagnosing bipolar disorder, and a further need to improve treatments. However, this paper has emphasized the need to be aware of recent advances and the emerging uses of new pharmacological treatments in the management of bipolar disorder. It has also highlighted the need for tailoring management to the individual. In particular, the successful treatment of bipolar disorder requires achieving prophylaxis and preventing relapse. In this regard, maintenance therapy is of paramount importance, and thus the tolerability of agents needs to be considered throughout treatment and should be factored into all management decisions. At the centre is the individual with bipolar disorder and the need to maintain a healthy therapeutic relationship. However, it is important to note that the evidence synthesized in this paper serves only as a guide to the management of bipolar disorder and that, in clinical practice, all treatment recommendations require contextual interpretation, the consideration of local factors and the consultation of additional resources.
    L Encéphale 12/2010; 36 Suppl 6:S188-96. · 0.60 Impact Factor
Show more