Article

Lifestyle interventions in the treatment of childhood overweight: A meta-analytic review of randomized controlled trials

Department of Psychiatry, Washington University School of Medicine, MO 63110, USA.
Health Psychology (Impact Factor: 3.95). 10/2007; 26(5):521-32. DOI: 10.1037/0278-6133.26.5.521
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Evaluating the efficacy of pediatric weight loss treatments is critical.
This is the first meta-analysis of the efficacy of RCTs comparing pediatric lifestyle interventions to no-treatment or information/education-only controls.
Medline, PsycINFO, and Cochrane Controlled Trials Register.
Fourteen RCTs targetting change in weight status were eligible, yielding 19 effect sizes.
Standardized coding was used to extract information on design, participant characteristics, interventions, and results.
For trials with no-treatment controls, the mean effect size was 0.75 (k = 9, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.52-0.98) at end of treatment and 0.60 (k = 4, CI = 0.27-0.94) at follow-up. For trials with information/education-only controls, the mean ES was 0.48 (k = 4, CI = 0.13-0.82) at end of treatment and 0.91 (k = 2, CI = 0.32-1.50) at follow-up. No moderator effects were identified.
Lifestyle interventions for pediatric overweight are efficacious in the short term with some evidence for extended persistence. Future research is required to identify moderators and mediators and to determine the optimal length and intensity of treatment required to produce enduring changes in weight status.

0 Followers
 · 
66 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The objective of this study was to assess changes in adolescent girls' health-enhancing cognitions and behaviors targeted by the Go Girls! group-based mentorship lifestyle program. Three hundred and ten adolescent girls (nested within 40 Go Girls! groups) completed questionnaires that assessed cognitions (attitudes, self-regulatory efficacy, and intentions) and behaviors (physical activity and dietary) at four time points (two pre-program, one at the end of the program, and one at 7-week follow-up). Hierarchical linear modeling was used to examine changes in the outcome variables among Go Girls! participants (M age = 11.68 years, SD = 0.80). No significant changes occurred in the outcome variables during the baseline comparison period (Time 1-2). When compared to the average of the baseline assessments, 7 weeks after completing the program, girls reported significant improvements in physical activity (M Baseline PAtotal = 3.82, SD = 3.49; M T4 PAtotal = 4.38, SD = 3.75) and healthy eating (M Baseline = 10.71, SD = 1.13; M T4 = 11.35, SD = 1.05) behavior and related cognitions (d values ≥0.65). Findings provide preliminary support for programs that foster belongingness and target health behaviors through mentorship models.
    03/2015; 5(1):77-86. DOI:10.1007/s13142-014-0285-9
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: There is limited research on optimal treatment formats for childhood obesity. Group-based interventions are popular, but it is unclear whether outcomes can be obtained without an additional individual component. To examine statistically and clinically significant outcomes of recent group-based and mixed-format (group + Individual) pediatric obesity interventions. Effect sizes and magnitudes of weight change were calculated for studies published between January 2013 and September 2014. Approximately half of the group-based studies reviewed produced significant results compared to control, and effect sizes were small. Mixed-format studies were less likely to include a control group, but those that did evidenced medium to large effects. Magnitudes of weight change post-intervention were generally greater in mixed-format studies than group-only studies. Recent studies in pediatric obesity interventions suggest including an individual component in a group-based intervention produces optimal outcomes. Future research should directly compare group-only and mixed formats to confirm this observation.
    Current Cardiovascular Risk Reports 02/2015; 9(16). DOI:10.1007/s12170-015-0443-8
  • Source
    03/2015; 16(1). DOI:10.15309/15psd160109

Full-text (2 Sources)

Download
22 Downloads
Available from
May 16, 2014