Applying EMDR on children with PTSD

Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Uppsala University Hospital, Uppsala 751 85, Sweden.
European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry (Impact Factor: 3.34). 10/2007; 17(3):127-32. DOI: 10.1007/s00787-007-0646-8
Source: PubMed


To find out child-adjusted protocol for eye movement desensitization and reprocessing (EMDR).
Child-adjusted modification were made in the original adult-based protocol, and within-session measurements, when EMDR was used in a randomized controlled trial (RCT) on thirty-three 6-16-year-old children with post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD).
EMDR was applicable after certain modifications adjusted to the age and developmental level of the child. The average treatment effect size was largest on re-experiencing, and smallest on hyperarousal scale. The age of the child yielded no significant effects on the dependent variables in the study.
A child-adjusted protocol for EMDR is suggested after being applied in a RCT for PTSD among traumatized and psychosocially exposed children.

Download full-text


Available from: Abdulbaghi Ahmad,
  • Source
    • "However, given the serious limitations of this study, results must be reviewed with caution. Though this treatment technique has been tested with children, results tend to be much more inconclusive, when compared to studies with adults (Ahmad et al. 2008). Few RCTs have evaluated EMDR techniques, and even fewer studies suggest that EMDR would be useful for children when compared with other standard trauma therapies such as TF-CBT. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This article examines the methodological rigor of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of eye movement desensitization reprocessing (EMDR) conducted specifically with children and adolescents who had a diagnosis of posttraumatic stress disorder and history of trauma. A thorough search for RCTs of EMDR with children and adolescents that were published between 1998 and 2010 was conducted utilizing several databases. A total of five studies were identified. Following an extensive review of the literature, it became apparent that the number of RCTs conducted with EMDR with children and adolescents was negligible, though initial results suggest that it is a promising practice. Although current EMDR studies have been conducted with children and adolescents, and have indicated that EMDR is a promising practice, the state of knowledge at this point is insufficient. EMDR tends to produce less positive results when compared to other trauma-focused interventions, although some research indicates the opposite.
    Child and Adolescent Social Work Journal 10/2012; 29(5). DOI:10.1007/s10560-012-0266-0
  • Source

  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This article reviews maltreatment-related pediatric posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) neuroimaging and neuropsychology research. Existent interventions that target brain networks associated with PTSD and cognitive impairment are highlighted. Furthermore, the benefits of combining neuroimaging and neuropsychology research in treatment outcomes are discussed. To conduct this review, a literature search was done utilizing the words MRI, structural, functional, neuropsychological testing, children, maltreatment, treatment, and PTSD. This was supplemented with a direct search of developmental trauma experts. Results from the neuroimaging studies found differences in the total cerebral volume, prefrontal cortex, hippocampus, cerebellum, superior temporal gyrus, corpus callosum, and other regions in maltreatment-related childhood PTSD. Neuropsychological findings demonstrate deficits in memory, attention, learning, and executive function that correspond to these brain regions. Existent and novel psychotherapeutic interventions address these deficits. These interventions may be directed at key networks associated with cognitive processing. Future directions include the implementation of treatment outcome research integrating psychotherapy with putative biological and psychological markers.
    Journal of Family Violence 01/2012; 28(1). DOI:10.1007/s10896-012-9489-2 · 1.17 Impact Factor
Show more