Article

Simple anthropometric indices in relation to cardiovascular risk factors in Chinese type 2 diabetic patients.

Department of Endocrinology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical School, Huazhong Technology University, Wuhan 430022, Hubei, PR China.
The Chinese journal of physiology (Impact Factor: 1.28). 06/2007; 50(3):135-42.
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT To determine which is the best anthropometric index among body mass index (BMI), waist circumference (WC), waist to hip ratio (WHR) and waist to height ratio (WHtR) in type 2 diabetic patients, we examined the relationship between these indices and cardiovascular risk factors using partial correlation analysis, chi-square test, logistic regression analysis and Receiver Operator Characteristic (ROC) curves. Partial correlation analysis showed that among the 4 obesity indices, WHtR had the highest r values for all the cardiovascular risk factors in both sexes, followed by WC. Chi-square analysis which revealed that an increased WHtR was more strongly associated with hypertension, hypertriglyceridemia (high TG) and low high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) than the other indices. Logistic regression analysis showed that, after controlling for age, the hypertension, high TG and low HDL-C odds ratios of WHtR > or = 0.5 were 2.56 (95% CI: 1.24, 5.29), 2.87 (95% CI: 1.43, 5.78), 2.59 (95% CI: 1.03, 6.59) in men and 3.75 (95% CI: 1.75, 8.05), 3.21 (95% CI: 1.52, 6.79), 3.62 (95% CI: 1.43, 9.21) in women, respectively. In ROC analysis, the areas under curve of WHtR were the largest for at least one risk factor in both men and women. These results indicated that WHtR had a higher correlation with cardiovascular risk factors than WC, WHR or BMI in newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes. We proposed the measurement of WHtR as a screening tool for cardiovascular risk factors in this population.

Download full-text

Full-text

Available from: Juan Zheng, Jul 29, 2015
0 Followers
 · 
124 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Antecedentes: Medidas antropométricas de adiposidad como índice de masa corporal (IMC), circunferencia de cintura (CC), razón cintura-cadera (RCC) y razón cintura-estatura (RCE) son conocidas por estar asociadas a factores de riesgo metabólico. Sin embargo, es controversial cual de ellas es mejor para predecir riesgo cardiovascular y mortalidad. Método: En este estudio de cohorte prospectivo con una muestra ponderada de 6714 hombres y 6340 mujeres, examinamos la relación entre índices antropométricos de adiposidad, factores de riesgo cardiovascular y mortalidad. Calculamos el área bajo la curva ROC (Receiving Operating Characteristic) evaluando el desempeño de cada índice para detectar hipertensión, diabetes o dislipidemia. El riesgo relativo de mortalidad con intervalos de confianza al 95% (IC95%) fue calculado utilizando regresión logística controlando por edad y factores de riesgo. Resultados: En hombres, las áreas bajo la curva ROC para detectar uno o más factores de riesgo fueron: IMC 0.75 (0.74-0.77), CC 0.85 (0.84-0.86), RCC 0.80 (0.79-0.81) y RCE 0.90 (0.89-0.91). En mujeres esas áreas fueron 0,72 (0,71-0,74), 0,77 (0,76-0,79), 0,65 (0,63-0,66) y 0,81 (0,80-0,82) respectivamente. Durante 8 años de seguimiento (670 muertes, 362 hombres), el riesgo multivariado de mortalidad para IMC, CC, RCC y RCE fue en hombres 0,81 (0,58-1,10), 1,27 (0,93-1,74), 0,89 (0,66-1,21) y 2,37 (1,61-3,49) respectivamente. En mujeres, el riesgo para IMC, CC, RCC, RCE fue 0,95 (0,70-1,27), 1,35 (1,00-1,85), 1,54 (1,17-2,16), y 1,56 (1,13-2,26) respectivamente. Conclusiones: El ajuste de la CC por la estatura permite predecir con mayor precisión factores de riesgo cardiovascular y mortalidad. Se propone un nomograma para adultos chilenos. Esta investigación fue financiada por un Grant de Fundación Araucaria, con sede en San Diego, California. Elard Koch es apoyado parcialmente por beca doctoral MECESUP UCH-0219, Escuela de Salud Pública, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Chile.
  • Source
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This study was designed to evaluate the epidemiology of type 2 diabetes and hypertension in Uygur and Kazak ethnic populations. A three-step stratified sampling method was used. Questionnaires, blood pressure, anthropometric measurement, and fasting blood glucose were monitored. In total, 1,571 Uygur and 2,913 Kazak subjects were randomly enrolled. The prevalence of type 2 diabetes and glucose intolerance was 5.55- and 1.90-fold higher, respectively, in Uygur than in the Kazak population (8.16 vs. 1.47%, P < 0.001 and 3.29 vs. 1.73%, P < 0.001). However, the prevalence of hypertension and obesity was significantly higher in the Kazak than in the Uygur population (hypertension: 43.52 vs. 31.98%, P < 0.001; obesity: 25.0 vs. 14.5%, P < 0.001, respectively). Our data suggest a significantly different prevalence in hypertension, hyperlipidemia, and type 2 diabetes between the two ethnic groups. The prevalence of type 2 diabetes was much lower, while the prevalence of hypertension was much higher associated with a higher incidence of obesity in the Kazak population. Individuals with a greater BMI and blood pressure were more prone to development of type 2 diabetes. Our data revealed that waist circumference of Kazak ethnics was greater than that of Uygur, even at the same BMI level. Serum fasting glucose was associated with different factors in Uygur and Kazak.
    Cardiovascular toxicology 09/2008; 8(4):155-9. DOI:10.1007/s12012-008-9024-0 · 2.06 Impact Factor
Show more