A Methodology for Evaluating Organizational Change in Community-Based Chronic Disease Interventions

Monterey County Health Department, Salinas, California, USA.
Preventing chronic disease (Impact Factor: 1.96). 11/2007; 4(4):A105.
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT In 2003, the Monterey County Health Department, serving Salinas, California, was awarded one of 12 grants from the Steps to a HealthierUS Program to implement a 5-year, multiple-intervention community approach to reduce diabetes, asthma, and obesity. National adult and youth surveys to assess long-term outcomes are required by all Steps sites; however, site-specific surveys to assess intermediate outcomes are not required.
Salinas is a medically underserved community of primarily Mexican American residents with high obesity rates and other poor health outcomes. The health department's Steps program has partnered with traditional organizations such as schools, senior centers, clinics, and faith-based organizations as well as novel organizations such as employers of agricultural workers and owners of taquerias.
The health department and the Stanford Prevention Research Center developed new site-specific, community-focused partner surveys to assess intermediate outcomes to augment the nationally mandated surveys. These site-specific surveys will evaluate changes in organizational practices, policies, or both following the socioecological model, specifically the Spectrum of Prevention.
Our site-specific partner surveys helped to 1) identify promising new partners, select initial partners from neighborhoods with the greatest financial need, and identify potentially successful community approaches; and 2) provide data for evaluating intermediate outcomes matched to national long-term outcomes so that policy and organizational level changes could be assessed. These quantitative surveys also provide important context-specific qualitative data, identifying opportunities for strengthening community partnerships.
Developing site-specific partner surveys in multisite intervention studies can provide important data to guide local program efforts and assess progress toward intermediate outcomes matched to long-term outcomes from nationally mandated surveys.

  • Source
    Preventing chronic disease 11/2007; 4(4):A85. · 1.96 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Studies of neighborhood influences on health behaviors suggest that residence in deprived neighborhoods increases the risk of unhealthy behaviors because of less availability and lower quality of health-promoting resources. However, almost all studies have used indirect measures of neighborhood resources when examining these associations. We used direct measures of tobacco, food, and physical activity environments to compare three socioeconomically contrasting neighborhoods and examine whether the lower income neighborhood had fewer health-promoting resources (and of a lower quality) than the higher income neighborhood. The three neighborhoods in Salinas, California, were selected based upon census data and advice from city planners. A complete census of tobacco, food, and outdoor physical activity resources in each neighborhood was carried out in 2004-2005. Data collected included availability, cost, and variety of specific foods; characteristics of resources, including hours, appearance, size, and advertising; tobacco availability and location, promotional materials and enforcement; and appearance and quality of physical activity resources. Data were compared across the neighborhoods. The largest differences by neighborhood income were found in quality rather than availability of resources. Although food in general was less expensive in the lower income neighborhood, it also had lower availability of produce and milk. Similarly, even though there were more parks in the lower income neighborhood, they were smaller and were rated higher on traffic hazards and lower on amenities and aesthetics. We suggest that neighborhood income may not be highly correlated with overall availability of tobacco, food, and/or physical activity resources, as some studies have documented. Rather, correlations may depend more upon qualitative characteristics.
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Signal detection analysis, a form of recursive partitioning, was used to identify combinations of sociodemographic and acculturation factors that predict trying to lose weight in a community-based sample of 957 overweight and obese Mexican-American adults (ages 18-69 years). Data were pooled from the 2004 and 2006 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System conducted in a low-income, semi-rural community in California. Overall, 59 % of the population reported trying to lose weight. The proportion of adults who were trying to lose weight was highly variable across the seven mutually exclusive groups identified by signal detection (range 30-79 %). Significant predictors of trying to lose weight included BMI, gender, age and income. Women who were very overweight (BMI > 28.5 kg/m2) were most likely to be trying to lose weight (79 %), followed by very overweight higher-income men and moderately overweight (BMI = 25.0-28.5 kg/m2) higher-income women (72 % and 70 %, respectively). Moderately overweight men, aged 28-69 years, were the least likely to be trying to lose weight (30 %), followed by moderately overweight lower-income women (47 %) and very overweight lower-income men (49 %). The latter group is of particular concern since they have characteristics associated with medical complications of obesity (low education and poor access to medical care). Our findings highlight opportunities and challenges for public health professionals working with overweight Mexican-American adults - particularly lower-income adults who were born in Mexico - who are not trying to lose weight and are therefore at high risk for obesity-related co-morbidities.
    Public Health Nutrition 03/2008; 12(1):64-73. DOI:10.1017/S136898000800181X · 2.48 Impact Factor
Show more

Preview (2 Sources)

Available from