Comparison of a verbal numeric rating scale with the visual analogue scale for the measurement of acute pain.

Department of Emergency Medicine, St George Hospital, Gray St, Kogarah, NSW 2217, Australia.
Emergency Medicine Australasia 01/2003; 15(5-6):441-6. DOI: 10.1046/j.1442-2026.2003.00499.x
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT To test the agreement between the visual analogue scale (VAS) and a verbal numeric rating scale (VNRS) in measuring acute pain, and measure the minimum clinically significant change in VNRS.
Patients scored their pain by the VAS and the VNRS, then re-scored their pain every 30 min for up to 2 h. Patients also recorded whether their pain had improved or worsened. Agreement between scores was evaluated, and where patients scored their pain as 'a bit worse' or 'a bit better' the mean change in VNRS was calculated.
A total of 309 paired observations were obtained from 79 patients. The VAS and VNRS were highly correlated (r = 0.95, 95% CI 0.94-0.96). The VNRS was significantly higher than the VAS for the paired observations, with 95% of the differences between VAS and VNRS lying between -2.3 and 1.3 cm. The minimum clinically significant difference in VNRS was 1.4 cm (95% CI 1.2-1.6).
The VNRS performs as well as the VAS in assessing changes in pain. However, although the VAS and VNRS are well correlated, patients systematically score their pain higher on the VNRS, with an unacceptably wide distribution of the differences.

1 Bookmark
  • Source
    Academic Emergency Medicine - ACAD EMERG MED. 01/2005; 12:157-157.
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: OBJECTIVE: Main objective of this study was to examine the chemosensory effects of formaldehyde on hyposensitive and hypersensitive males at concentrations relevant to the workplace. Attention focused on objective effects on and subjective symptoms of the mucous membranes of the eyes, the nose, the upper respiratory tract and olfactory function. METHODS: Forty-one male volunteers were exposed for 5 days (4 h per day) in a randomised schedule to the control condition (0 ppm) and to formaldehyde concentrations of 0.5 and 0.7 ppm and to 0.3 ppm with peak exposures of 0.6 ppm, and to 0.4 ppm with peak exposures of 0.8 ppm, respectively. Peak exposures were carried out four times a day over a 15-min period of time. Subjective pain perception induced by nasal application of carbon dioxide served as indicator for sensitivity to sensory nasal irritation. The following parameters were examined before and after exposure: subjective rating of symptoms and complaints (Swedish Performance Evaluation System), conjunctival redness, eye-blinking frequency, self-reported tear film break-up time and nasal flow rates. In addition, the influence of personality factors on the volunteer's subjective scoring was examined (Positive And Negative Affect Schedule). RESULTS: Formaldehyde exposures to 0.7 ppm for 4 h and to 0.4 ppm for 4 h with peaks of 0.8 ppm for 15 min caused no significant sensory irritation of the measured conjunctival and nasal parameters. No differences between hypo- and hypersensitive subjects were seen. Nevertheless, statistically significant differences were noted for olfactory symptoms, especially for the 'perception of impure air'. These subjective complaints were more pronounced in hypersensitive subjects. CONCLUSIONS: Formaldehyde concentrations of 0.7 ppm for 4 h and of 0.4 ppm for 4 h with peaks of 0.8 ppm for 15 min did not cause adverse effects related to irritation, and no differences between hypo- and hypersensitive subjects were observed.
    International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health 02/2012; · 2.10 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Intramuscular (i.m.) pethidine is used worldwide for labour analgesia and i.m. diamorphine usage has increased in the UK in the last 15 years. This trial aims to ascertain the relative efficacy and adverse effects of diamorphine and pethidine for labour pain. Prospective, parallel-arm randomised controlled trial with blinding of participants, care-givers and outcome assessors. Maternity units in two District General Hospitals in the UK. After written informed consent, 484 women were randomised and recruited (244 diamorphine, 240 pethidine). Inclusion criteria included women 16 years or older, established labour, singleton pregnancy, 37-42 weeks of gestation and weight 60-120 kg. On request of i.m. analgesia, participants received either 150 mg pethidine or 7.5 mg diamorphine based on computer-generated block randomisation. Maternal-reduction in pain intensity from baseline (10-cm visual analogue scale) at 60 minutes and over the 3-hour period after drug administration. Neonatal-requirement for resuscitation and Apgar score at 1 minute. Diamorphine provided modestly improved pain relief at 60 minutes, mean difference 1 cm (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.5-1.5), and over the 3 hours, mean difference 0.7 cm (95% CI 0.3-1.1). However, average length of labour in women receiving diamorphine was 82 minutes longer (95% CI 39-124) and therefore they experienced more pain overall. There were no statistically significant differences in primary neonatal outcomes. There is a modest difference between the analgesia provided by diamorphine or pethidine for labour analgesia but diamorphine is associated with significantly longer labours.
    BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology 12/2013; · 3.76 Impact Factor