Naturopathic Care for Chronic Low Back Pain: A Randomized Trial

University of Ottawa, Canada
PLoS ONE (Impact Factor: 3.23). 09/2007; 2(9):e919. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0000919
Source: PubMed


Chronic low back pain represents a substantial cost to employers through benefits coverage and days missed due to incapacity. We sought to explore the effectiveness of Naturopathic care on chronic low back pain.
This study was a randomized clinical trial. We randomized 75 postal employees with low back pain of longer than six weeks duration to receive Naturopathic care (n = 39) or standardized physiotherapy (n = 36) over a period of 12 weeks. The study was conducted in clinics on-site in postal outlets. Participants in the Naturopathic care group received dietary counseling, deep breathing relaxation techniques and acupuncture. The control intervention received education and instruction on physiotherapy exercises using an approved education booklet. We measured low back pain using the Oswestry disability questionnaire as the primary outcome measure, and quality of life using the SF-36 in addition to low back range of motion, weight loss, and Body Mass Index as secondary outcomes.
Sixty-nine participants (92%) completed eight weeks or greater of the trial. Participants in the Naturopathic care group reported significantly lower back pain (-6.89, 95% CI. -9.23 to -3.54, p = <0.0001) as measured by the Oswestry questionnaire. Quality of life was also significantly improved in the group receiving Naturopathic care in all domains except for vitality. Differences for the aggregate physical component of the SF-36 was 8.47 (95% CI, 5.05 to 11.87, p = <0.0001) and for the aggregate mental component was 7.0 (95% CI, 2.25 to 11.75, p = 0.0045). All secondary outcomes were also significantly improved in the group receiving Naturopathic care: spinal flexion (p<0.0001), weight-loss (p = 0.0052) and Body Mass Index (-0.52, 95% CI, -0.96 to -0.08, p = 0.01).
Naturopathic care provided significantly greater improvement than physiotherapy advice for patients with chronic low back pain. ISRCTN41920953.

Download full-text


Available from: Jason W Busse,
  • Source

  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To determine the cost-effectiveness of naturopathic care (acupuncture, relaxation exercises, exercise and dietary advice, and a back care booklet) compared to standardized physiotherapy education and a back care booklet (control treatment) for low back pain in a sample (N = 70) of warehouse workers. Economic evaluation based upon the results of a pragmatic randomized controlled trial to determine the cost-effectiveness of naturopathic care to society as a whole, to the employer, and to participants. Naturopathic care (as compared to the control treatment) significantly improved quality-adjusted life-years over the 6-month study period (3-month intervention period and 3-month follow-up period) by 0.0256 (95% CI: 0.0075, 0.0437)--roughly equivalent to 9.4 "perfect health" days. Naturopathic care also significantly reduced societal costs by $1212 per participant. From the perspective of the employer, the intervention cost $154 per absentee day avoided (compared to employer costs of lost productivity of $172 per day) and had a return on investment of 7.9% under the healthcare coverage limits set by this employer and assuming the employer paid the full cost of naturopathic care. Participants experienced savings in adjunctive care of $1096 per participant. This economic evaluation alongside a pragmatic randomized control trial shows naturopathic care to be more cost-effective than a standardized physiotherapy education regimen in the treatment of chronic low back pain. Further studies of the economic impact of naturopathic medicine are warranted.
    Alternative therapies in health and medicine 03/2008; 14(2):32-9. · 1.24 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To report and critically appraise the current state of managing chronic (and subacute) low back pain as reflected in recently published guidelines and results from latest trials. Although occurrence rates of and social benefits for back pain are apparently on the decline (at least in Germany), it is still one of the most frequent and costly health disorders in Western countries. Ten percent of the adult German population suffers from chronic disabling back pain. For this group, a plethora of interventions is recommended. The most recent guideline from the US alone enumerates eight different treatments based on 'moderate-quality evidence'. Latest (often high-quality) trials from 2006 to 2007 strengthen the evidence base, only modestly, owing to their conflicting and/or confusing results. Recommendations for the management of chronic disabling nonspecific back pain have made little progress over the past 10 years. The field still suffers from a 'strong weakness' due to a generally weak body of evidence. Progress can be expected when the effects of an intervention can be reliably calibrated against comparators of known (in)effectiveness. At present, an individualized clinical approach seems most appropriate. Patients and doctors are free to choose, according to their experiences and preferences, from recommended treatments.
    Current Opinion in Rheumatology 06/2008; 20(3):276-81. DOI:10.1097/BOR.0b013e3282f94256 · 4.89 Impact Factor
Show more