Factors influencing the decision to use nurse practitioners in the emergency department

Washington State University, پولمن، واشینگتن, Washington, United States
Journal of Emergency Nursing (Impact Factor: 1.13). 11/2007; 33(5):441-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.jen.2006.10.019
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Emergency department overcrowding is a serious problem nationwide. Of an estimated 14 million visits to hospital emergency departments, only 12.9% are considered emergent. Many emergency departments, however, employ only physicians despite the fact that nurse practitioners have a proven record of providing high quality, cost-effective care in the emergency department. The purpose of the study was to determine factors that influence the decision to use nurse practitioners in the emergency department.
Interviews were conducted with ED managers in hospitals that both employ and do not employ nurse practitioners in the emergency department.
In this study, the primary reason that nurse practitioners were not employed by emergency departments was that physician groups with whom the hospitals contract refuse to use nurse practitioners. Emergency department managers of facilities with nurse practitioners reported high levels of satisfaction with the nurse practitioners performance. The 2 ED managers without nurse practitioners in their facility were highly supportive of having nurse practitioners in the emergency department and have advocated for hiring nurse practitioners.
Education needs to occur with emergency departments regarding the value of the nurse practitioner's role to the facility. Research is needed to investigate why emergency department physician groups resist hiring nurse practitioners. Increased staffing with nurse practitioners in the emergency department can serve to reduce overcrowding, reduce waiting times, and increase patient satisfaction.

  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The purpose of this descriptive study was to determine the willingness of emergency department patients, triaged to fast track areas, to be treated by an advanced practice registered nurse. A survey was distributed to a convenience sample of patients triaged to fast track areas in three southeastern emergency departments. The survey contained basic demographic information, four multiple-choice questions, and a section for comments. A majority of patients (65%) responded that they were willing to be treated by a nurse practitioner. Patients who had been treated by a nurse practitioner in the past were more willing to be treated by a nurse practitioner during this visit. Implications for practice: The results of this study support the addition of nurse practitioners to fast track emergency department teams. Additional studies that focus on public and professional education regarding the role of the emergency nurse practitioner are warranted.
    Advanced emergency nursing journal 01/2009; 31(3):228-35. DOI:10.1097/TME.0b013e3181af6882
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The aim of the study was to evaluate use of physician assistants (PAs) and nurse practitioners (NPs) in US emergency departments (EDs). We analyzed visits from the 1993 to 2005 National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey, seen by midlevel provider (MLP), and compared characteristics of MLP visits to those seen by physicians only. From 1993 to 2005, 5.2% (95% CI, 4.6%-5.8%) of US ED visits were seen by PAs and 1.7% (95% CI, 1.5%-2.0%) by NPs. During the study period, PA visits rose from 2.9% to 9.1%, whereas NP visits rose from 1.1% to 3.8% (both P(trend) < .001). Compared to physician only visits, those seen only by MLPs arrived by ambulance less frequently (6.0% vs 15%), had lower urgent acuity (37% vs 59%), and were admitted less often (3.0% vs 13%). Midlevel provider use has increased in US EDs. Their involvement in some urgent visits and those requiring admission suggests that the role of MLPs extends beyond minor presentations.
    The American journal of emergency medicine 01/2010; 28(1):90-4. DOI:10.1016/j.ajem.2008.09.028 · 1.15 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The provision of emergency care in the United States, regionalized or not, depends on an adequate workforce. Adequate must be defined both qualitatively and quantitatively. There is currently a shortage of emergency care providers, one that will exist for the foreseeable future. This article discusses what is known about the current emergency medicine (EM) and non-EM workforce, future trends, and research opportunities.
    Academic Emergency Medicine 12/2010; 17(12):1286-96. DOI:10.1111/j.1553-2712.2010.00938.x · 2.20 Impact Factor


Available from