Factors influencing the decision to use nurse practitioners in the emergency department

Washington State University, پولمن، واشینگتن, Washington, United States
Journal of Emergency Nursing (Impact Factor: 1.13). 11/2007; 33(5):441-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.jen.2006.10.019
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Emergency department overcrowding is a serious problem nationwide. Of an estimated 14 million visits to hospital emergency departments, only 12.9% are considered emergent. Many emergency departments, however, employ only physicians despite the fact that nurse practitioners have a proven record of providing high quality, cost-effective care in the emergency department. The purpose of the study was to determine factors that influence the decision to use nurse practitioners in the emergency department.
Interviews were conducted with ED managers in hospitals that both employ and do not employ nurse practitioners in the emergency department.
In this study, the primary reason that nurse practitioners were not employed by emergency departments was that physician groups with whom the hospitals contract refuse to use nurse practitioners. Emergency department managers of facilities with nurse practitioners reported high levels of satisfaction with the nurse practitioners performance. The 2 ED managers without nurse practitioners in their facility were highly supportive of having nurse practitioners in the emergency department and have advocated for hiring nurse practitioners.
Education needs to occur with emergency departments regarding the value of the nurse practitioner's role to the facility. Research is needed to investigate why emergency department physician groups resist hiring nurse practitioners. Increased staffing with nurse practitioners in the emergency department can serve to reduce overcrowding, reduce waiting times, and increase patient satisfaction.

  • Source
    • "Lenz et al. (2004) found in their 2-year follow-up study that outcomes of patients assigned for their primary care to a NP practice do not differ from those of patients assigned to a physician. Other research (e.g., Blunt, 1998; Chamberlain and Klig, 2001; McGee and Kaplan, 2007) have also proven that the use of NPs can provide high quality, efficient and cost-effective care in EDs. In this investigation, we evaluate the benefits from replacing the regular registered nurses at the triage stations by NPs. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This paper presents a case study which uses simulation to analyze patient flows in a hospital emergency department in Hong Kong. We first analyze the impact of the enhancements made to the system after the relocation of the Emergency Department. After that, we developed a simulation model (using ARENA) to capture all the key relevant processes of the department. When developing the simulation model, we faced the challenge that the data kept by the Emergency Department were incomplete so that the service-time distributions were not directly obtainable. We propose a simulation–optimization approach (integrating simulation with meta-heuristics) to obtain a good set of estimate of input parameters of our simulation model. Using the simulation model, we evaluated the impact of possible changes to the system by running different scenarios. This provides a tool for the operations manager in the Emergency Department to “foresee” the impact on the daily operations when making possible changes (such as, adjusting staffing levels or shift times), and consequently make much better decisions.
    Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal 07/2014; DOI:10.1007/s10696-014-9198-7 · 1.44 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The purpose of this descriptive study was to determine the willingness of emergency department patients, triaged to fast track areas, to be treated by an advanced practice registered nurse. A survey was distributed to a convenience sample of patients triaged to fast track areas in three southeastern emergency departments. The survey contained basic demographic information, four multiple-choice questions, and a section for comments. A majority of patients (65%) responded that they were willing to be treated by a nurse practitioner. Patients who had been treated by a nurse practitioner in the past were more willing to be treated by a nurse practitioner during this visit. Implications for practice: The results of this study support the addition of nurse practitioners to fast track emergency department teams. Additional studies that focus on public and professional education regarding the role of the emergency nurse practitioner are warranted.
    Advanced emergency nursing journal 07/2009; 31(3):228-35. DOI:10.1097/TME.0b013e3181af6882
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The aim of the study was to evaluate use of physician assistants (PAs) and nurse practitioners (NPs) in US emergency departments (EDs). We analyzed visits from the 1993 to 2005 National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey, seen by midlevel provider (MLP), and compared characteristics of MLP visits to those seen by physicians only. From 1993 to 2005, 5.2% (95% CI, 4.6%-5.8%) of US ED visits were seen by PAs and 1.7% (95% CI, 1.5%-2.0%) by NPs. During the study period, PA visits rose from 2.9% to 9.1%, whereas NP visits rose from 1.1% to 3.8% (both P(trend) < .001). Compared to physician only visits, those seen only by MLPs arrived by ambulance less frequently (6.0% vs 15%), had lower urgent acuity (37% vs 59%), and were admitted less often (3.0% vs 13%). Midlevel provider use has increased in US EDs. Their involvement in some urgent visits and those requiring admission suggests that the role of MLPs extends beyond minor presentations.
    The American journal of emergency medicine 01/2010; 28(1):90-4. DOI:10.1016/j.ajem.2008.09.028 · 1.15 Impact Factor
Show more


Available from