Factors Influencing the Decision to Use Nurse Practitioners in the Emergency Department

Washington State University, پولمن، واشینگتن, Washington, United States
Journal of Emergency Nursing (Impact Factor: 0.79). 11/2007; 33(5):441-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.jen.2006.10.019
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Emergency department overcrowding is a serious problem nationwide. Of an estimated 14 million visits to hospital emergency departments, only 12.9% are considered emergent. Many emergency departments, however, employ only physicians despite the fact that nurse practitioners have a proven record of providing high quality, cost-effective care in the emergency department. The purpose of the study was to determine factors that influence the decision to use nurse practitioners in the emergency department.
Interviews were conducted with ED managers in hospitals that both employ and do not employ nurse practitioners in the emergency department.
In this study, the primary reason that nurse practitioners were not employed by emergency departments was that physician groups with whom the hospitals contract refuse to use nurse practitioners. Emergency department managers of facilities with nurse practitioners reported high levels of satisfaction with the nurse practitioners performance. The 2 ED managers without nurse practitioners in their facility were highly supportive of having nurse practitioners in the emergency department and have advocated for hiring nurse practitioners.
Education needs to occur with emergency departments regarding the value of the nurse practitioner's role to the facility. Research is needed to investigate why emergency department physician groups resist hiring nurse practitioners. Increased staffing with nurse practitioners in the emergency department can serve to reduce overcrowding, reduce waiting times, and increase patient satisfaction.

27 Reads
  • Source
    • "Lenz et al. (2004) found in their 2-year follow-up study that outcomes of patients assigned for their primary care to a NP practice do not differ from those of patients assigned to a physician. Other research (e.g., Blunt, 1998; Chamberlain and Klig, 2001; McGee and Kaplan, 2007) have also proven that the use of NPs can provide high quality, efficient and cost-effective care in EDs. In this investigation, we evaluate the benefits from replacing the regular registered nurses at the triage stations by NPs. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This paper presents a case study which uses simulation to analyze patient flows in a hospital emergency department in Hong Kong. We first analyze the impact of the enhancements made to the system after the relocation of the Emergency Department. After that, we developed a simulation model (using ARENA) to capture all the key relevant processes of the department. When developing the simulation model, we faced the challenge that the data kept by the Emergency Department were incomplete so that the service-time distributions were not directly obtainable. We propose a simulation–optimization approach (integrating simulation with meta-heuristics) to obtain a good set of estimate of input parameters of our simulation model. Using the simulation model, we evaluated the impact of possible changes to the system by running different scenarios. This provides a tool for the operations manager in the Emergency Department to “foresee” the impact on the daily operations when making possible changes (such as, adjusting staffing levels or shift times), and consequently make much better decisions.
    Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal 07/2014; DOI:10.1007/s10696-014-9198-7 · 1.87 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "On the positive side, workforce expansion with MLPs might improve quality and safety of care by improving such metrics as door-to-provider time and percentage of patients who leave the ED without being evaluated. Prior studies have found that ED patients are satisfied with the care provided by MLPs [15,16] and that few prefer to wait longer to be seen by a physician [15]. Nevertheless, quality concerns remain [8]. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Emergency department (ED) visits in the US have risen dramatically over the past 2 decades. In order to meet the growing demand, mid-level providers (MLPs) - both physician assistants (PAs) and nurse practitioners (NPs) - were introduced into emergency care. Our objective was to test the hypothesis that MLP usage in US EDs continues to rise. We analyzed ED data from the National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey to identify trends in ED visits seen by MLPs. We also compared MLP-only visits (defined as visits where the patient was seen by a MLP without being seen by a physician) with those seen by physicians only. During 1993 to 2009, 8.4% (95%CI, 7.6-9.2%) of all US ED visits were seen by MLPs. These summary data include marked changes in MLP utilization: PA visits rose from 2.9% to 9.9%, while NP visits rose from 1.1% to 4.7% (both Ptrend < 0.001). Together, MLP visits accounted for almost 15% of 2009 ED visits and 40% of these were seen without involvement of a physician. Compared to physician only visits, those seen by MLPs only were less likely to arrive by ambulance (16% vs 6%) and be admitted (14% vs 3%). Mid-level provider use is rising in US EDs. By 2009, approximately one in seven visits involved MLPs, with PAs managing twice as many visits as NPs. Although patients seen by MLPs only are generally of lower acuity, these nationally representative data confirm that MLP care extends beyond minor presentations.
    International Journal of Emergency Medicine 05/2012; 5(1):21. DOI:10.1186/1865-1380-5-21
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Overcrowding and long waiting times are among the chronic problems of emergency Departments. The effectiveness and safety of See and Treat approach were assessed searching the available literature. The following key words were searched in Medline: See and Treat, Minor Injuries Unit, Fast Track, Emergency Department, and Emergency Nurse Practitioner selecting articles in English and Italian. The 21 articles selected include 15 original studies, 2 systematic reviews and 3 letters. The large majority of the studies support the implementation of an advanced nurse practitioner (ANP) to screen patients and reduce waiting times for patients with minor codes. Although the results of the studies come to the same conclusion, the methodological quality is weak and the costs of the implementation of an ANP need to be further explored. To implement a minor injury service the role and competences of ANPs need to be discussed, together with role boundaries with medical doctors. Patients should be able to choose if they prefer to be visited by a doctor. Guidelines and protocols should be implemented and strictly followed.
    Assistenza infermieristica e ricerca: AIR 01/2008; 27(3):136-44. · 0.32 Impact Factor
Show more


27 Reads
Available from