Development of a Physical Education-Related State Policy Classification System (PERSPCS).

Centre for Community Child Health Research, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia.
American Journal of Preventive Medicine (Impact Factor: 4.28). 11/2007; 33(4 Suppl):S264-76. DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2007.07.019
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT As policy-based approaches are increasingly proposed to address childhood obesity, this paper seeks to: (1) present the development of a system to systematically and reliably assess the nature and extent of state physical education (PE) and recess-related policies; (2) determine the inter-rater agreement in using the system; and (3) report on the variability in state policies using a December 31, 2003 baseline.
The PE and Recess State Policy Classification System (PERSPCS) was developed from a conceptual framework and was informed by reviewing the scientific and gray literatures and through consultations with an expert panel and key experts. Statutes and regulations enacted as of December 31, 2003 were retrieved from Westlaw (data retrieved and analyzed in 2004-2005).
PERSPCS addresses five areas: PE time requirements, staffing requirements for PE, curriculum standards for PE, assessment of health-related fitness, and recess time (elementary schools only). The inter-rater agreement ranged from 0.876 (PE staffing requirements) to perfect agreement (recess time). Staffing requirements had more restrictive policies, followed in decreasing order by time requirements, curriculum standards, assessment, and recess time. Overall, state policies met minimal requirements across areas and grade levels as of December 2003.
Extending PERSPCS to address other aspects of childhood obesity is a critical first step in understanding the range of state policy approaches in this area and their impact. PERSPCS should be examined in conjunction with school district-level policies to determine the overall effects of policies on school environmental and behavioral outcomes. PERSPCS is not designed to set policy guidelines.


Available from: Amy Yaroch, Apr 18, 2015
  • Source
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: It is important to quickly and efficiently identify policies that are effective at changing behavior; therefore, we must be able to quantify and evaluate the effect of those policies and of changes to those policies. The purpose of this study was to develop state-level physical education (PE) and physical activity (PA) policy domain scores at the high-school level. Policy domain scores were developed with a focus on measuring policy change. Exploratory factor analysis was used to group items from the state-level School Health Policies and Programs Study (SHPPS) into policy domains. Items that related to PA or PE at the High School level were identified from the 7 SHPPS health program surveys. Data from 2000 and 2006 were used in the factor analysis. From the 98 items identified, 17 policy domains were extracted. Average policy domain change scores were positive for 12 policy domains, with the largest increases for "Discouraging PA as Punishment", "Collaboration", and "Staff Development Opportunities". On average, states increased scores in 4.94 +/- 2.76 policy domains, decreased in 3.53 +/- 2.03, and had no change in 7.69 +/- 2.09 policy domains. Significant correlations were found between several policy domain scores. Quantifying policy change and its impact is integral to the policy making and revision process. Our results build on previous research offering a way to examine changes in state-level policies related to PE and PA of high-school students and the faculty and staff who serve them. This work provides methods for combining state-level policies relevant to PE or PA in youth for studies of their impact.
    International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity 07/2013; 10(1):86. DOI:10.1186/1479-5868-10-86 · 3.68 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To determine if state physical education (PE) laws are associated with student PE attendance and physical activity (PA), and whether PE and competitive food laws, in conjunction, are associated with lower BMI change. State laws regarding PE time requirements and competitive foods in 2003 and 2006 were classified as strong, weak, or none, based on codified law ratings obtained from the Classification of Laws Associated with School Students. Laws were linked to student data on PE attendance and PA (8(th) grade, Spring 2007) and BMI change (5(th)-8(th) grade, 2004-2007), obtained from the Early Childhood Longitudinal Study (n=5510 students in 40 states). Girls reported 0.31 more days of activity (95% CI: 0.02, 0.61) and were more likely to attend PE ≥3days/week (74.1% vs. 52.1%, difference=22.0, 95% CI: 2.1, 42.0) if they resided in states with strong PE laws compared to no PE laws. Weak PE laws had modest associations with PE and activity, and there was no evidence that weak laws reduce BMI gain regardless of competitive food laws. Strong PE laws with specific time requirements may increase PE attendance and activity in girls. There is insufficient evidence that PE laws reduce student weight gain.
    Preventive Medicine 08/2013; DOI:10.1016/j.ypmed.2013.08.018 · 2.93 Impact Factor