Optimization and validation of a fully-integrated pulse sequence for modified look-locker inversion-recovery (MOLLI) T1 mapping of the heart

Cardiac MRI Unit, Franz-Volhard-Klinik, Charité Campus Buch, Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Helios-Klinikum Berlin, Germany.
Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging (Impact Factor: 2.79). 11/2007; 26(4):1081-6. DOI: 10.1002/jmri.21119
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT To optimize and validate a fully-integrated version of modified Look-Locker inversion-recovery (MOLLI) for clinical single-breathhold cardiac T1 mapping.
A MOLLI variant allowing direct access to all pulse sequence parameters was implemented on a 1.5T MR system. Varying four critical sequence parameters, MOLLI was performed in eight gadolinium-doped agarose gel phantoms at different simulated heart rates. T1 values were derived for each variant and compared to nominal T1 values. Based on the results, MOLLI was performed in midcavity short-axis views of 20 healthy volunteers pre- and post-Gd-DTPA.
In phantoms, a readout flip angle of 35 degrees , minimum TI of 100 msec, TI increment of 80 msec, and use of three pausing heart cycles allowed for most accurate and least heart rate-dependent T1 measurements. Using this pulse sequence scheme in humans, T1 relaxation times in normal myocardium were comparable to data from previous studies, and showed narrow ranges both pre- and postcontrast without heart rate dependency.
We present an optimized implementation of MOLLI for fast T1 mapping with high spatial resolution, which can be integrated into routine imaging protocols. T1 accuracy is superior to the original set of pulse sequence parameters and heart rate dependency is avoided.

  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background: The purpose of this work was to evaluate different magnetisation preparation and readout sequences for modified Look-Locker inversion recovery (MOLLI) towards improved T1 mapping in the heart. Elements investigated include: catalysation sequences to prepare the magnetisation before readout, alternate k-space trajectories, a spoiled gradient recalled echo (GRE) readout, and a 5b(3b)3b MOLLI sampling scheme (‘b’ denoting beats). Methods: Conventional 3b(3b)3b(3b)5b MOLLI with a linear k-space trajectory was compared to four variants in simulations, in vitro and in vivo (at 3T). Variants were centric conventional MOLLI, centric-paired conventional MOLLI, linear 5b(3b)3b MOLLI and spoiled GRE MOLLI. Each of these was applied with three magnetisation catalysation methods, and T1 measurement accuracy and precision were evaluated in simulations via a Monte Carlo algorithm, in a set of calibrated phantoms, and in ten healthy volunteers. Contrast-to-noise, heart rate dependence and B1+ dependence were also evaluated. Results: A linear k-space trajectory was superior in vitro to centric and centric-paired trajectories. Of the catalysation methods, preparation of transverse magnetisation only—using a linearly increasing flip angle catalysation—improved MOLLI T1 measurement accuracy, precision, and map quality versus methods that include catalysation of the longitudinal magnetisation. The 5b(3b)3b MOLLI scheme offered comparable native T1 measurement accuracy and precision to conventional MOLLI, despite its shortened acquisition. Conclusions: MOLLI T1 measurement accuracy, precision, and map quality depends on the method of catalysation of magnetisation prior to image acquisition, as well as on the readout method and MOLLI sampling scheme used.
    Magnetic Resonance Imaging 02/2015; DOI:10.1016/j.mri.2015.02.004 · 2.02 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Myocardial fibrosis is always present in end-stage heart failure and is a major independent predictor of adverse cardiac outcome. Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) is an imaging method that permits a non-invasive assessment of the heart and has been established as the "gold standard" for the evaluation of cardiac anatomy and function, as well as for quantifying focal myocardial fibrosis in both ischaemic and non-ischaemic heart disease. However, cardiac pathologies characterised by diffuse myocardial fibrosis cannot be evaluated by late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) imaging, as there are no reference regions of normal myocardium. Recent improvements in CMR imaging techniques have enabled parametric mapping of relaxation properties (T1, T2 and T2*) clinically feasible within a single breath-hold. T1 mapping techniques performed both with and without contrast enable the quantification of diffuse myocardial fibrosis and myocardial infiltration. This article reviews current imaging techniques, emerging applications and the future potential and limitations of CMR for T1 mapping. • Myocardial fibrosis is a common endpoint in a variety of cardiac diseases. • Myocardial fibrosis results in myocardial stiffness, heart failure, arrhythmia and sudden death. • T1-mapping CMR techniques enable the quantification of diffuse myocardial fibrosis. • Native T1 reflects myocardial disease involving the myocyte and interstitium. • The use of gadolinium allows measurement of the extracellular volume fraction, reflecting interstitial space.
    11/2014; DOI:10.1007/s13244-014-0366-9
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Cardiovascular magnetic resonance is a well-established tool for the quantification of focal fibrosis. With the introduction of T1 mapping, diffuse myocardial processes can be detected and quantified. In particular, infiltration and storage disorders with large disease-related changes, and diffuse fibrosis where measurement is harder but the potential impact larger. This has added a new dimension to the understanding and assessment of various myocardial diseases. T1 mapping promises to detect early disease, quantify disease severity and provide prognostic insights into certain conditions. It also has the potential to be a robust surrogate marker in drug development trials to monitor therapeutic response and be a prognostic marker in certain diseases. T1 mapping is an evolving field and numerous factors currently preclude its standardization. In this review, we describe the current status of T1 mapping and its potential promises and pitfalls.
    Circulation Journal 02/2015; 79(3). DOI:10.1253/circj.CJ-15-0054 · 3.69 Impact Factor