Computed Tomography Versus Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II Score in Predicting Severity of Acute Pancreatitis

Computed Tomography Department, Konstantopoulio Agia Olga Hospital, Athens, Greece.
Pancreas (Impact Factor: 2.96). 11/2007; 35(3):238-42. DOI: 10.1097/MPA.0b013e3180619662
Source: PubMed


The aim of the study was to compare Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score and C-reactive protein as a clinical index and computed tomography-based severity index (CTSI) in predicting the course of acute pancreatitis.
One hundred forty-eight patients with acute pancreatitis were enrolled in the study during a 2-year period. All data concerning etiology, Atlanta classification, CT findings, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation score, C-reactive protein levels, stay in the intensive care unit, length of hospital stay, treatment, complications, and deaths were analyzed with Mann-Whitney U, Wilcoxon, Pearson, and Spearman statistical tests. The CT was performed on a spiral unit after intravenous administration of contrast material. Images were graded according to the Balthazar-CTSI scoring system.
A very good correlation was noticed between Balthazar-CTSI scores and local complications, whereas no statistically significant correlation was found between CT scores and stay in the intensive care unit. Among survivors and nonsurvivors, there were no statistically significant differences as far as CT scores were concerned.
Although the extent of necrosis as defined on contrast-enhanced CT examinations is considered as a risk factor for a negative prognosis, our findings suggest that the initially documented disease severity according only to imaging parameters is not highly important for the final patient outcome.

6 Reads
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: We propose an efficient multiple description coder using a newly modified embedded zerotree wavelet (EZW) coding method. We use an expanded threshold and two subordinate passes. We then present a multiple description encoder with two channels using an overlapped threshold. To evaluate the performance of our proposed encoder, we apply our method to image compression.
    Signal Processing, 2002 6th International Conference on; 09/2002
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Introduction: Acute pancreatitis (AP) is a very importantcause of morbidity and mortality in Mexico.In 2001 AP was the 17th cause of death. Since 1994,the computed tomography (CT) scan was acceptedfor the screening of the severity (a) according to theComputed Tomography Severity Index (CTSI). In2004 Mortele et al., developed a new tomographyclassification, Modified Computed Tomography SeverityIndex (MCTSI) including pancreatic andextra pancreatic disease, obtaining a very goodcorrelation with those with organ failure. This studyproposes compare the tomography classificationsas indicators of severity. Methods: Cross-sectionalstudy. Were included 30 patients with acute pancreatitis;APACHE II >= 8, non improvement with medicaltreatment and with initial mild pancreatitis,with addition of signs of complication in the first72 hours of evolution, under CT scan, CTSIM andCTSI were compared. Statistical analysis using X2 test was calculated, kappa concordance coefficient(k) for the severity classifications. Results: APprevalence was 51.07%.Of the 30 patients including,19 man with mean age of 39.0 years (18-58 years),and 11 woman, with mean age of 50.9 years (22-82years). The main causes were biliary pancreatitisin 16 cases (53.3%), and the second was alcohol,8 cases (26.7%). The kappa concordance coefficientfor both tomography scans was 0.48 (p <= 0.003). For the CTSIM and CTSI sensitivity was 61% vs. 38%,specificity 66% vs. 100% and positive predictivevalue of 81% vs. 100%, respectively. Conclusions:The CTSIM is more useful for the screening in patientswith severe acute pancreatitis than CTSI.Key words: Acute pancreatitis (AP), ComputedTomography Severity Index (CTSI), Modified ComputedTomography Severity Index (MCTSI).
    Revista de gastroenterologia de Mexico 07/2008; 73(3):144-8.
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Patients with acute pancreatitis may present with mild or severe disease, the latter comprising a minority of cases but accounting for most of the morbidity and mortality associated with this disease. Contrast-enhanced computed tomography is the mainstay of imaging patients with acute pancreatitis and is widely used in both the community and academic settings. A variety of retroperitoneal morphologic changes are readily depicted, and the correct assessment of these abnormalities is imperative for management. The purpose of this review is to describe the imaging evaluation of patients with acute pancreatitis by using the 1992 Atlanta Symposium classification and definitions to describe local complications depicted on contrast-enhanced computed tomography. Correlation with the proposed revision of Atlanta Symposium definitions set forth by the Acute Pancreatitis Working Group will be discussed.
    Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology: the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association 11/2008; 6(10):1077-85. DOI:10.1016/j.cgh.2008.07.012 · 7.90 Impact Factor
Show more