Focal F-18 fluoro-deoxy-glucose accumulation in the lung parenchyma in the absence of CT abnormality in PET/CT.

Division of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography (Impact Factor: 1.6). 01/2007; 31(5):800-5. DOI: 10.1097/RCT.0b013e3180340376
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT To demonstrate 3 cases of artifactual focal F-18 fluoro-deoxy-glucose accumulation in the lung parenchyma in the absence of any computed tomographic (CT) abnormality.
Three patients were examined: a 30-year-old man who had a positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography for restaging a biopsy-proven recurrence of head and neck cancer, a 68-year-old woman who was referred for initial staging of esophageal carcinoma, and a 57-year-old man who had a PET/computed tomography for initial staging of melanoma. In each case, there was intense focal activity in the lung parenchyma with no corresponding CT abnormality. Each patient was further evaluated with a repeat PET scan in days 1 and 3 in the first 2 cases and with a delayed repeat acquisition in the third case. Patients were followed for 24, 10, and 1 month, respectively.
In the first 2 cases, the abnormal focal activity in the lungs had resolved in the repeat study. In the third case, the focus of increased activity in the lung had moved more peripherally in the delayed acquisition. Clinical follow-up was negative for disease in the corresponding pulmonary parenchymal sites.
The finding of significant focal accumulation of fluoro-deoxy-glucose in the lung parenchyma in the absence of corresponding CT abnormality was artifactual. This was likely due to injection technique and the creation of particulate embolus. Positron emission tomography/Computed tomographic readers should be aware of this type of artifact to avoid misinterpretation.

  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: F-18-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography/CT is an important whole-body imaging tool in the oncology and widely utilized to stage and restage various malignancies. The findings of significant focal accumulation of FDG in the lung parenchyma in the absence of corresponding CT abnormalities are related to the lung microembolism and known as hot-clot artifacts. Herein we present two cases with focal FDG uptake in the lung parenchyma with no structural lesions on the CT scan and discuss the possible mechanisms.
    Korean journal of radiology: official journal of the Korean Radiological Society 07/2014; 15(4):530-3. DOI:10.3348/kjr.2014.15.4.530 · 1.81 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Because only pathologic examination can confirm the presence or absence of malignant disease in cancer patients, a certain rate of misinterpretation in any kind of imaging study is inevitable. For the accuracy of interpretation to be improved, determination of the nature, causes, and magnitude of this problem is needed. This study was designed to collect pertinent information from physicians referring patients for oncologic (18)F-FDG PET/CT. A total of 662 referring physicians completed an 11-question survey focused on their experience with the interpretation of oncologic (18)F-FDG PET/CT studies. The participants were oncologists (36.1%; n = 239), hematologists (14.5%; n = 96), radiation oncologists (7.4%; n = 49), surgeons (33.8%; n = 224), and other physicians (8.2%; n = 54). Questions were aimed at determining the frequency, nature, and causes of scan misinterpretations as well as potential solutions to reduce the frequency of misinterpretations. Perceived misinterpretation rates ranged from 5% to 20%, according to most (59.3%) of the participants; 20.8% of respondents reported rates of less than 5%. Overinterpretation rather than underinterpretation was more frequently encountered (68.9% vs. 8.7%, respectively). Limited availability of a patient's history and limited experience of interpreters were the major contributors to this phenomenon, according to 46.8% and 26.7% of the participants, respectively. The actions most commonly suggested to reduce misinterpretation rates (multiple suggestions were possible) were the institution of multidisciplinary meetings (59.8%), the provision of adequate history when ordering an examination (37.4%), and a discussion with imaging specialists when receiving the results of the examination (38.4%). Overinterpretation rather than underinterpretation of oncologic (18)F-FDG PET/CT studies prevails in clinical practice, according to referring physicians. Closer collaboration of imaging specialists with referring physicians through more multidisciplinary meetings, improved communication, and targeted training of interpreting physicians are actions suggested to reduce the rates of misinterpretation of oncologic (18)F-FDG PET/CT studies. © 2014 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Inc.
    Journal of Nuclear Medicine 12/2014; 55(12):1925-9. DOI:10.2967/jnumed.114.145607 · 5.56 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The purpose of this article is to provide a pictorial review of the findings and interpretative pitfalls about focal fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) uptake in the absence of corresponding computer tomography (CT) lesion or abnormality on an integrated positron emission tomography (PET)-CT. The integrated CT images in the PET-CT scanner allow correct co-registration and fused imaging of anatomical and functional data. On FDG PET-CT imaging, a real pathologic process often demonstrates abnormal uptake associated with a visible corresponding CT lesion or abnormality. When focal uptake is seen on PET imaging but no corresponding anatomic abnormality is visualized on the integrated CT, one should always be aware of possible mis-registration or mismatch of the PET and CT images due to the patient's respiratory or body motion. While most of the hot spots in the absence of corresponding anatomic abnormalities are artefactual or secondary to benign etiologies, some may represent small sized or early staged neoplasm or metastases, especially in the gastrointestinal tract and skeletons. Caution should be exercised to simply diagnose a pathology based on the presence of the uptake only, or exclude the disease based on the absence of anatomic abnormality.
    12/2013; 5(12):460-467. DOI:10.4329/wjr.v5.i12.460