Focal F-18 fluoro-deoxy-glucose accumulation in the lung parenchyma in the absence of CT abnormality in PET/CT.

Division of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography (Impact Factor: 1.6). 01/2007; 31(5):800-5. DOI: 10.1097/RCT.0b013e3180340376
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT To demonstrate 3 cases of artifactual focal F-18 fluoro-deoxy-glucose accumulation in the lung parenchyma in the absence of any computed tomographic (CT) abnormality.
Three patients were examined: a 30-year-old man who had a positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography for restaging a biopsy-proven recurrence of head and neck cancer, a 68-year-old woman who was referred for initial staging of esophageal carcinoma, and a 57-year-old man who had a PET/computed tomography for initial staging of melanoma. In each case, there was intense focal activity in the lung parenchyma with no corresponding CT abnormality. Each patient was further evaluated with a repeat PET scan in days 1 and 3 in the first 2 cases and with a delayed repeat acquisition in the third case. Patients were followed for 24, 10, and 1 month, respectively.
In the first 2 cases, the abnormal focal activity in the lungs had resolved in the repeat study. In the third case, the focus of increased activity in the lung had moved more peripherally in the delayed acquisition. Clinical follow-up was negative for disease in the corresponding pulmonary parenchymal sites.
The finding of significant focal accumulation of fluoro-deoxy-glucose in the lung parenchyma in the absence of corresponding CT abnormality was artifactual. This was likely due to injection technique and the creation of particulate embolus. Positron emission tomography/Computed tomographic readers should be aware of this type of artifact to avoid misinterpretation.

  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The purpose of this article is to provide a pictorial review of the findings and interpretative pitfalls about focal fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) uptake in the absence of corresponding computer tomography (CT) lesion or abnormality on an integrated positron emission tomography (PET)-CT. The integrated CT images in the PET-CT scanner allow correct co-registration and fused imaging of anatomical and functional data. On FDG PET-CT imaging, a real pathologic process often demonstrates abnormal uptake associated with a visible corresponding CT lesion or abnormality. When focal uptake is seen on PET imaging but no corresponding anatomic abnormality is visualized on the integrated CT, one should always be aware of possible mis-registration or mismatch of the PET and CT images due to the patient's respiratory or body motion. While most of the hot spots in the absence of corresponding anatomic abnormalities are artefactual or secondary to benign etiologies, some may represent small sized or early staged neoplasm or metastases, especially in the gastrointestinal tract and skeletons. Caution should be exercised to simply diagnose a pathology based on the presence of the uptake only, or exclude the disease based on the absence of anatomic abnormality.
    World journal of radiology. 12/2013; 5(12):460-467.
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Transient visualization of a FDG avid abnormality in the lungs without any structural lesion is reported in a case of iatrogenic pulmonary microembolism.
    World journal of nuclear medicine. 01/2013; 12(1):38-40.
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: F-18-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography/CT is an important whole-body imaging tool in the oncology and widely utilized to stage and restage various malignancies. The findings of significant focal accumulation of FDG in the lung parenchyma in the absence of corresponding CT abnormalities are related to the lung microembolism and known as hot-clot artifacts. Herein we present two cases with focal FDG uptake in the lung parenchyma with no structural lesions on the CT scan and discuss the possible mechanisms.
    Korean journal of radiology: official journal of the Korean Radiological Society 07/2014; 15(4):530-3. · 1.32 Impact Factor