Epidemiology and contemporary patterns of trauma deaths: Changing place, similar pace, older face

Acute Care Medicine Research Network, Institute of Health Studies, University of Stavanger, 8100, N-4068 Stavanger, Norway.
World Journal of Surgery (Impact Factor: 2.35). 12/2007; 31(11):2092-103. DOI: 10.1007/s00268-007-9226-9
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The epidemiology of trauma deaths in Europe is less than well investigated. Thus, our goal was to study the contemporary patterns of trauma deaths within a defined population with an exceptionally high trauma autopsy rate.
This was a retrospective evaluation of 260 consecutive trauma autopsies for which we collected demographic, pre-hospital and in-hospital data. Patients were analyzed for injury severity by standard scoring systems (Abbreviated Injury Scale [AIS], Revised Trauma Score [RTS], and Injury Severity Score [ISS]), and the Trauma and Injury Severity Scale [TRISS] methodology.
The fatal trauma incidence was 10.0 per 100,000 inhabitants (17.4 per 100,000 age-adjusted > or = 55 years). Blunt mechanism (87%), male gender (75%), and pre-hospital deaths (52%) predominated. Median ISS was 38 (range: 4-75). Younger patients (<55 years) who died in the hospital were more often hypotensive (SBP < 90 mmHg; p = 0.001), in respiratory distress (RR < 10/min, or > 29/min; p < 0.0001), and had deranged neurology on admission (Glasgow Coma Score [GCS] < or = 8; p < 0.0001), compared to those > or = 55 years. Causes of death were central nervous system (CNS) injuries (67%), exsanguination (25%), and multiorgan failure (8%). The temporal death distribution is model-dependent and can be visualized in unimodal, bimodal, or trimodal patterns. Age increased (r = 0.43) and ISS decreased (r = -0.52) with longer time from injury to death (p < 0.001). Mean age of the trauma patients who died increased by almost a decade during the study period (from mean 41.7 +/- 24.2 years to mean 50.5 +/- 25.4 years; p = 0.04). The pre-hospital:in-hospital death ratio shifted from 1.5 to 0.75 (p < 0.007).
While pre-hospital and early deaths still predominate, an increasing proportion succumb after arrival in hospital. Focus on injury prevention is imperative, particularly for brain injuries. Although hemorrhage and multiorgan failure deaths have decreased, they do still occur. Redirected attention and focus on the geriatric trauma population is mandated.

1 Bookmark
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Conocer la epidemiología, cronograma y causas de mortalidad tardía en los politraumatizados graves.DiseñoObservacional prospectivo de cohortes integrado en un registro provincial de trauma.ÁmbitoProvincia de Guipúzcoa. Unidad de cuidados intensivos (UCI) hospital terciario.PacientesTodos los traumatizados graves: Injury Severity Score (ISS) > 15, ingresados en UCI entre el 1 de enero de 1995 y el 31de diciembre de 2009, fallecidos tardíamente (> 7 días).VariablesEpidemiológicas, analíticas, hemodinámicas, transfusionales y escalas de gravedad Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS) e ISS.ResultadosPacientes: 2.003. ISS: 24,3 ± 14,2. Exitus: 405 (20%). Fallecidos >7 días: 102 (25,2%) con 9 años más y 18 puntos menos de ISS que los fallecidos a las 48 h. Lesiones más graves: AIS-cabeza-columna cervical ≥ 4 (52%); AIS-abdomen ≥ 4 (19,65) AIS-tórax ≥ 4 (11,7%); AIS-extremidades ≥ 4 (4,9%). Causas de fallecimiento: 1) muerte encefálica (14,7%); 2) fracaso multiorgánico (FMO) (67,6%) presente en 2 contextos lesionales: a) TCE grave en estado vegetativo y lesiones agudas de médula espinal (LAME) cervicales altas con tetraplejía (35,3%) y b) lesiones no neurológicas (32,3%), con alta prevalencia de shock hipovolémico, politransfusión y coagulopatía; 3) una variada miscelánea (10,7%): encefalopatía hipóxica, embolia pulmonar e ictus masivo; 4) no evaluables (7%).ConclusionesLa edad, la gravedad, y las características lesionales, influyen en la distribución temporal y causalidad de la mortalidad tardía. La muerte encefálica sigue siendo prevalente. El FMO es la causa más frecuente. Estos hallazgos pueden ayudar a una mejor planificación de los recursos estructurales y educativos, y a la reducción de la morbi-mortalidad del trauma.
    Medicina Intensiva 08/2013; 37(6):383-390. DOI:10.1016/j.medin.2012.07.001 · 1.24 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background Approximately 10% of the Norwegian population is injured every year, with injuries ranging from minor injuries treated by general practitioners to major and complex injuries requiring specialist in-hospital care. There is a lack of knowledge concerning the caseload of potentially severely injured patients in Norwegian hospitals. Aim of the study was to describe the current status of the Norwegian trauma system by identifying the number and the distribution of contributing hospitals and the caseload of potentially severely injured trauma patients within these hospitals.MethodsA cross-sectional survey with a structured questionnaire was sent in the summer of 2012 to all Norwegian hospitals that receive trauma patients. These were defined by number of trauma team activations in the included hospitals. A literature review was performed to assess over time the development of hospitals receiving trauma patients.ResultsForty-one hospitals responded and were included in the study. In 2011, four trauma centres and 37 acute care hospitals received a total of 6,570 trauma patients. Trauma centres received 2,175 (33%) patients and other hospitals received 4,395 (67%) patients. There were significant regional differences between health care regions in the distribution of trauma patients between trauma centres and acute care hospitals. More than half (52.5%) of the hospitals received fewer than 100 patients annually. The national rate of hospital admission via trauma teams was 13 per 10,000 inhabitants. There was a 37% (from 65 to 41) reduction in the number of hospitals receiving trauma patients between 1988 and 2011.Conclusions In 2011, hospital acute trauma care in Norway was delivered by four trauma centres and 37 acute care hospitals. Many hospitals still receive a small number of potentially severely injured patients and only a few hospitals have an electronic trauma registry. Future development of the Norwegian trauma system needs to address the challenge posed by a scattered population and long geographical distances. The implementation of a trauma system, carefully balanced between centres with adequate caseloads against time from injury to hospital care, is needed and has been shown to have a beneficial effect in countries with comparable challenges.
    Scandinavian Journal of Trauma Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine 11/2014; 22(1):64. DOI:10.1186/s13049-014-0064-0 · 1.93 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background The incidence of cervical spine fractures (CS-fx) in the general population is sparingly assessed. The aim of the current study was to estimate the incidence of traumatic CS-fx and of open surgery of cervical spine injuries in the Norwegian population.Methods The Norwegian Patient Register (NPR) is an administrative database that contains activity data from all Norwegian government-owned hospitals and outpatient clinics. The diagnoses and procedures are coded according to the International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems (ICD-10) and the NOMESCO Classification of Surgical Procedures (NCSP), respectively. We retrieved information on all severe traumatic cervical spine injuries between 2009 and 2012 from the NPR. Updated information on the date of death is included through routine linkage to the General Register Office.ResultsBetween 2009 and 2012, a total of 3 248 patients met our criteria for severe traumatic cervical spine injury. A total of 2 963 patients had one or more CS-fx, and 285 had severe non-fracture cervical spine injuries. The median age was 54 years, and 69% of the patients were male. The incidence of CS-fx and severe non-fracture injuries in the total Norwegian population was 16.5/100 000/year, and the incidence of CS-fx was 15.0/100 000/year. A total of 18% of the patients were treated with open surgery, resulting in an estimated incidence of surgery for acute traumatic cervical spine injury of 3.0/100 000/ year in the Norwegian population. The 1- and 3-month mortality rates were 4% and 6%, respectively.
    Scandinavian Journal of Trauma Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine 12/2014; 22(1):78. DOI:10.1186/s13049-014-0078-7 · 1.93 Impact Factor


Available from
May 17, 2014