Article

Relationship between the results of in vitro receptor binding assay to human estrogen receptor alpha and in vivo uterotrophic assay: comparative study with 65 selected chemicals.

Department of Human Environmental Science, Ochanomizu University, 2-1-1, Otsuka, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 112-8610, Japan.
Toxicology in Vitro (Impact Factor: 2.65). 03/2008; 22(1):225-31. DOI:10.1016/j.tiv.2007.08.004
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT For screening chemicals possessing endocrine disrupting potencies, the uterotrophic assay has been placed in a higher level in the OECD testing framework than the ER binding assay to detect ER-mediated activities. However, there are no studies that can demonstrate a clear relationship between these assays. In order to clarify the relationship between the in vitro ER binding and in vivo uterotrophic assays and to determine meaningful binding potency from the ER binding assay, we compared the results from these assays for 65 chemicals spanning a variety of chemicals classes. Under the quantitative comparison between logRBAs (relative binding affinities) and logLEDs (lowest effective doses), the log RBA was well correlated with both logLEDs of estrogenic and anti-estrogenic compounds at r(2)=0.67 (n=28) and 0.79 (n=23), respectively. The RBA of 0.00233% was found to be the lowest ER binding potency to elicit estrogenic or anti-estrogenic activities in the uterotrophic assay, accordingly this value is considered as the detection limit of estrogenic or anti-estrogenic activities in the uterotrophic assay. The usage of this value as cutoff provided the best concordance rate (82%). These findings are useful in a tiered approach for identifying chemicals that have potential to induce ER-mediated effects in vivo.

0 0
 · 
0 Bookmarks
 · 
36 Views
  • Source
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background: The observed age of menarche has fallen, which may have important adverse social and health consequences. Increased exposure to endocrine-disrupting compounds (EDCs) has been associated with adverse reproductive outcomes.Objective: Our objective was to assess the relationship between EDC exposure and the age of menarche in adolescent girls.Methods: We used data from female participants 12-16 years of age who had completed the reproductive health questionnaire and laboratory examination for the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) for years 2003-2008 (2005-2008 for analyses of phthalates and parabens). Exposures were assessed based on creatinine-corrected natural log urine concentrations of selected environmental chemicals and metabolites found in at least 75% of samples in our study sample. We used Cox proportional hazards analysis in SAS 9.2 survey procedures to estimate associations after accounting for censored data among participants who had not reached menarche. We evaluated body mass index (BMI; kilograms per meter squared), family income-to-poverty ratio, race/ethnicity, mother's smoking status during pregnancy, and birth weight as potential confounders.Results: The weighted mean age of menarche was 12.0 years of age. Among 440 girls with both reproductive health and laboratory data, after accounting for BMI and race/ethnicity, we found that 2,5-dichlorophenol (2,5-DCP) and summed environmental phenols (2,5-DCP and 2,4-DCP) were inversely associated with age of menarche [hazard ratios of 1.10; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.01, 1.19 and 1.09; 95% CI: 1.01, 1.19, respectively]. Other exposures (total parabens, bisphenol A, triclosan, benzophenone-3, total phthalates, and 2,4-DCP) were not significantly associated with age of menarche.Conclusions: Our findings suggest an association between 2,5-DCP, a potential EDC, and earlier age of menarche in the general U.S. population.
    Environmental Health Perspectives 11/2012; 120(11):1613-8. · 7.26 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Advances in high throughput and high content (HT/HC) methods such as those used in the fields of toxicogenomics, bioinformatics, and computational toxicology have the potential to improve both the efficiency and effectiveness of toxicity evaluations and risk assessments. However, prior to use, scientific confidence in these methods should be formally established. Traditional validation approaches that define relevance, reliability, sensitivity and specificity may not be readily applicable. HT/HC methods are not exact replacements for in vivo testing, and although run individually, these assays are likely to be used as a group or battery for decision making and use robotics, which may be unique in each laboratory setting. Building on the frameworks developed in the 2010 Institute of Medicine Report on Biomarkers and the OECD 2007 Report on (Q)SAR Validation, we present constructs that can be adapted to address the validation challenges of HT/HC methods. These are flexible, transparent, and require explicit specification of context and purpose of use such that scientific confidence (validation) can be defined to meet different regulatory applications. Using these constructs, we discuss how anchoring the assays and their prediction models to Adverse Outcome Pathways (AOPs) could facilitate the interpretation of results and support scientifically defensible fit-for-purpose applications. (200 words).
    Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology 01/2013; · 2.13 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND: Endocrine-disrupting chemicals (EDCs) are shown to influence the activity of estrogen receptors (ERs) and alter the function of the endocrine system. However, the diversity of EDC effects and mechanisms of action are poorly understood. OBJECTIVES: We identified agonistic activity of EDCs through ERα and ERβ and their effects on ER-mediated target genes. METHODS: HepG2 and HeLa cells were utilized to determine the agonistic activity of EDCs on ERα and ERβ via luciferase reporter assay. Ishikawa cells stably expressing ERα were used to determine changes in endogenous ER target gene expression by EDCs. RESULTS: Twelve EDCs were categorized into three groups based on their product class and similarity of chemical structure. Luciferase reporter analysis demonstrated that their ER agonistic effects are in a cell type/promoter specific manner. Bisphenol A, Bisphenol AF and 2-2-bis(p-hydroxyphenyl)-1,1,1-trichloroethane (Group 1) strongly activated the ERα ERE-mediated responses. Daidzein, Genistein, Kaempferol and Coumestrol (Group 2) activated both the ERα and ERβ ERE-mediated activities. Endosulfan and Kepone (Group 3) weakly activated ERα. Only a few EDCs significantly activated the "tethered" mechanism via ERα or ERβ. Real time-PCR results indicated that Bisphenol A and Bisphenol AF consistently activated endogenous ER target genes, but the activities of other EDCs on ER target gene expression changes were compound specific. CONCLUSION: EDCs with similar chemical structures tended to have comparable ERα and ERβ ERE-mediated activities, but did not correlate with their previously reported ligand binding affinities. Using ERα stable cells, we show EDCs differentially induce endogenous ER target gene activities.
    Environmental Health Perspectives 02/2013; · 7.26 Impact Factor