The perceived position of a moving object is not the result of position integration.

Department of Psychology and Behaviroal Sciences, Xixi Campus, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310028, People's Republic of China.
Vision Research (Impact Factor: 2.14). 12/2007; 47(24):3088-95. DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2007.08.012
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The flash-lag effect is a robust visual illusion in which a flash appears to spatially lag a continuously moving stimulus, even though both stimuli are actually precisely aligned. Some research has been done to test how visual information has been integrated over time. The position integration model suggests motion integration is a form of interpolation of past positions, and predicts that we cannot perceive the reversal point at its actual position on the trajectory of a moving object which reverses abruptly. In current research, we demonstrate that subjects could perceive the reversal point accurately while the psychometric function measured by a flash does not pass through the actual turning point. These results do not support the position integration model. We propose that the flash-lag effect is more likely to be a temporal illusion.

1 Bookmark
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: If an observer sees a flashed (briefly presented) object that is aligned with a moving target, the perceived position of the flashed object usually lags the perceived position of the moving target. This has been referred to as the flash-lag effect, and the flash-lag effect has been suggested to reflect how an observer compensates for delays in perception that are due to neural processing times and is thus able to interact with dynamic stimuli in real time. Characteristics of the stimulus and of the observer that influence the flash-lag effect are reviewed, and the sensitivity or robustness of the flash-lag effect to numerous variables is discussed. Properties of the flash-lag effect and how the flash-lag effect might be related to several other perceptual and cognitive processes and phenomena are considered. Unresolved empirical issues are noted. Theories of the flash-lag effect are reviewed, and evidence inconsistent with each theory is noted. The flash-lag effect appears to involve low-level perceptual processes and high-level cognitive processes, reflects the operation of multiple mechanisms, occurs in numerous stimulus dimensions, and occurs within and across multiple modalities. It is suggested that the flash-lag effect derives from more basic mislocalizations of the moving target or flashed object and that understanding and analysis of the flash-lag effect should focus on these more basic mislocalizations rather than on the relationship between the moving target and the flashed object. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2013 APA, all rights reserved).
    Psychological Bulletin 01/2014; 140(1):308-338. · 15.58 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The present research addresses the question of how visual predictive information and implied causality affect audio-visual synchrony perception. Previous research has shown a systematic shift in the likelihood of observers to accept audio-leading stimulus pairs as being apparently simultaneous in variants of audio-visual stimulus pairs that differ in (1) the amount of visual predictive information available and (2) the apparent causal relation between the auditory and visual components. An experiment was designed to separate the predictability and causality explanations, and the results indicated that shifts in subjective simultaneity were explained completely by changes in the implied causal relations in the stimuli and that predictability had no added value. Together with earlier findings, these results further indicate that the observed shifts in subjective simultaneity due to causal relations among auditory and visual events do not reflect a mere change in response strategy, but rather result from early multimodal integration processes in event perception.
    Attention Perception & Psychophysics 08/2013; · 1.97 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Previous attempts to measure localization bias around a right-angle turn (L-trajectory) have found either no spatial bias off the trajectory (Whitney, Cavanagh, & Murakami, 2000) or a bias, in different experiments, both 'inside' and 'outside' the trajectory (Nieman, Sheth, & Shimojo, 2010). However, Eagleman and Sejnowski (2007) presented data showing that the perceived location of a brief feature on two moving stimuli could be predicted from the vector sum of their directions after the feature appeared. Such a vector sum with an L-trajectory could predict that the perceived position before the turn should be biased 'sideways' off the trajectory, in the direction of the final motion. With stimuli that particularly facilitated accurate vernier judgments, and measuring bias via the flash-lag illusion, this is indeed what we observed. Our data thus favour Eagleman and Sejnowski's (2007) supposition. Further, the bias occurred before the change in direction, rather than after it, supporting the contention that it is motion after a point being sampled that affects its perception (Bachmann, Luiga, Põder, & Kalev, 2003; Eagleman & Sejnowski, 2007; Krekelberg & Lappe, 2000; Nieman et al., 2010).
    Vision research 01/2014; · 2.29 Impact Factor


1 Download
Available from