The perceived position of a moving object is not the result of position integration

Department of Psychology and Behaviroal Sciences, Xixi Campus, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310028, People's Republic of China.
Vision Research (Impact Factor: 1.82). 12/2007; 47(24):3088-95. DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2007.08.012
Source: PubMed


The flash-lag effect is a robust visual illusion in which a flash appears to spatially lag a continuously moving stimulus, even though both stimuli are actually precisely aligned. Some research has been done to test how visual information has been integrated over time. The position integration model suggests motion integration is a form of interpolation of past positions, and predicts that we cannot perceive the reversal point at its actual position on the trajectory of a moving object which reverses abruptly. In current research, we demonstrate that subjects could perceive the reversal point accurately while the psychometric function measured by a flash does not pass through the actual turning point. These results do not support the position integration model. We propose that the flash-lag effect is more likely to be a temporal illusion.

1 Follower
14 Reads
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The flash-lag effect refers to the phenomenon where a flash of a stationary stimulus presented adjacent to a moving stimulus appears to lag behind it. We investigated whether the flash-lag effect affected the tilt aftereffect using two sets of vertical gratings for a flash and a moving stimulus that created a specific orientation when aligned with a specific temporal offset. Our results show that a change in the perceptual appearance of stimuli in the presence of the flash-lag effect had a negligible influence on the tilt aftereffect. These data suggest that the flash-lag effect originates at a different neural processing stage than the early linear processing that presumably mediates the tilt aftereffect.
    Vision research 09/2010; 50(19):1949-56. DOI:10.1016/j.visres.2010.07.002 · 1.82 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Spatial projection and temporal integration are two prominent theories of visual localization for moving stimuli which gain most of their explanatory power from a single process. Spatial projection theories posit that a moving stimulus' perceived position is projected forwards in order to compensate for processing delays (Eagleman & Sejnowski, 2007; Nijhawan, 2008). Temporal integration theories (Krekelberg & Lappe, 2000) suggest that an averaging over positions occupied by the moving stimulus for a period of time is the dominant process underlying perception of position. We found that when magnocellular (M) pathway processing was reduced, there were opposite effects on localization judgments when a smooth, continuous trajectory was used, compared to when the moving object suddenly appeared, or suddenly reversed direction. The flash-lag illusion was decreased for the continuous trajectory, but increased for the onset and reversal trajectories. This cross-over interaction necessitates processes additional to those proposed by either the spatial projection or temporal integration theories in order to explain the perception of the position of moving stimuli across all our conditions. Differentiating our onset trajectory conditions from a Fröhlich illusion, in a second experiment, we found a null Fröhlich illusion under normal luminance-defined conditions, significantly smaller than the corresponding flash-lag illusion, but significantly increased when M processing was reduced. Our data are most readily accounted for by Kirschfeld and Kammer's (1999) backward-inhibition and focal attention theory.
    Journal of Vision 08/2013; 13(10). DOI:10.1167/13.10.16 · 2.39 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The present research addresses the question of how visual predictive information and implied causality affect audio-visual synchrony perception. Previous research has shown a systematic shift in the likelihood of observers to accept audio-leading stimulus pairs as being apparently simultaneous in variants of audio-visual stimulus pairs that differ in (1) the amount of visual predictive information available and (2) the apparent causal relation between the auditory and visual components. An experiment was designed to separate the predictability and causality explanations, and the results indicated that shifts in subjective simultaneity were explained completely by changes in the implied causal relations in the stimuli and that predictability had no added value. Together with earlier findings, these results further indicate that the observed shifts in subjective simultaneity due to causal relations among auditory and visual events do not reflect a mere change in response strategy, but rather result from early multimodal integration processes in event perception.
    Attention Perception & Psychophysics 08/2013; 75(7). DOI:10.3758/s13414-013-0531-0 · 2.17 Impact Factor
Show more


14 Reads
Available from