Article

Large blastocyst diameter, early blastulation, and low preovulatory serum progesterone are dominant predictors of clinical pregnancy in fresh autologous cycles.

Fertility Center of Las Vegas, Las Vegas, Nevada 89117, USA.
Fertility and sterility (impact factor: 3.97). 10/2007; 90(2):302-9. DOI:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.06.062 pp.302-9
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT To identify dominant predictors of clinical pregnancy in IVF cycles.
Retrospective study.
Private fertility center.
The study included 580 fresh autologous IVF cycles with blastocyst transfer.
None.
Clinical pregnancy rate.
A set of 25 suspected predictors was used to develop predictive models of clinical pregnancy in a set of 361 blastocyst transfer cycles. Initial bivariate analysis identified 14 of these variables that were significant enough to be candidate variables for multiple logistic regression. Similar sets of significant variables were identified by using alternative approaches for model construction. The final model included blastocyst diameter, day of blastulation, and preovulatory serum P level as significant predictors of clinical pregnancy. Specifically, clinical pregnancy was predicted by preovulatory serum P of <1.0 ng/mL, blastulation on day 5, and large blastocyst diameter. Of these variables, blastocyst diameter was the most significant predictor of clinical pregnancy in the multivariate models. The final model was validated against a separate set of 219 subsequent blastocyst transfer cycles.
Pre-ovulatory serum P level, blastulation day, and embryo diameter are simultaneously predictive of clinical pregnancy, and their relationships with clinical pregnancy are consistent with an effect of embryo-endometrium synchrony.

0 0
 · 
0 Bookmarks
 · 
24 Views
  • Source
    Article: Evidence of impaired endometrial receptivity after ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization: a prospective randomized trial comparing fresh and frozen-thawed embryo transfer in normal responders.
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To compare success rates between fresh ETs after ovarian stimulation and frozen-thawed ETs (FET) after artificial endometrial preparation, to compare endometrial receptivity. Randomized, controlled trial. Private fertility center. There were 53 patients completing fresh blastocyst transfer (fresh group) and 50 patients completing FET (cryopreservation group). All were first-time IVF patients aged <41 years, with cycle day 3 FSH <10 mIU/mL and 8-15 antral follicles. Randomized to fresh or thawed ET. Clinical pregnancy rate per transfer. The clinical pregnancy rate per transfer was 84.0% in the cryopreservation group and 54.7% in the fresh group. The implantation rates were 70.8% and 38.9%, respectively. The ongoing pregnancy rates per transfer (at 10 weeks' gestation) were 78.0% and 50.9%, respectively. The attributable risk percentage of implantation failure due to reduced endometrial receptivity in the fresh group was 64.7%. The clinical pregnancy rate per transfer was significantly greater in the cryopreservation group than in the fresh group. These results strongly suggest impaired endometrial receptivity in fresh ET cycles after ovarian stimulation, when compared with FET cycles with artificial endometrial preparation. Impaired endometrial receptivity apparently accounted for most implantation failures in the fresh group. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00963625.
    Fertility and sterility 08/2011; 96(2):344-8. · 3.97 Impact Factor
  • Article: Clinical outcome of fresh and vitrified-warmed blastocyst and cleavage-stage embryo transfers in ethnic Chinese ART patients.
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Objectives This study sought to evaluate the outcome of fresh and vitrified-warmed cleavage-stage and blastocyst-stage embryo transfers in patients undergoing ART treatment within an ethnic Chinese population.Study DesignWe compared the clinical results of embryo transfer on the 3rd (cleavage stage) or 5th (blastocyst stage) day after oocyte retrieval, including clinical pregnancy rates, implantation rates and multiple pregnancy rates. RESULTS: Our data showed that blastocyst transfer on day 5 did not significantly increase clinical pregnancy rate (41.07% vs 47.08%, p>0.05) and implantation rate (31.8% vs 31.2%, p>0.05) in patients under 35 years of age, in comparison with day 3 cleavage stage embryo transfer. In patients older than 35 years of age, the clinical pregnancy rate after blastocyst transfer was slightly decreased compared with cleavage stage embryo transfer (33.33% vs 42.31%, p>0.05). Unexpectedly, It was found that vitrified-warmed blastocyst transfer resulted in significantly higher clinical pregnancy rate (56.8%) and implantation rate (47%) compared with fresh blastocyst transfer in controlled stimulation cycles (41.07% and 31.8%, respectively). For patients under 35 years of age, the cumulative clinical pregnancy rate combining fresh and vitrified-warmed blastocyst transfer cycles were significantly higher compared to just cleavage-stage embryo transfer (70.1% versus 51.8%, p<0.05). However, the cumulative multiple pregnancy rates showed no significant difference between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: In an ethnic Chinese patient population, fresh blastocyst transfer does not significantly increase clinical pregnancy rate. However, subsequent vitrified-warmed blastocyst transfer in a non-controlled ovarian hyperstimulation cycle dramatically improves clinical outcomes. Therefore, blastocyst culture in tandem with vitrified-warmed blastocyst transfer is recommended as a favourable and promising protocol in human ART treatment, particularly for ethnic Chinese patients.
    Journal of Ovarian Research 10/2012; 5(1):27. · 2.57 Impact Factor

Full-text (2 Sources)

View
0 Downloads
Available from

Keywords

219 subsequent blastocyst transfer cycles
 
361 blastocyst transfer cycles
 
580 fresh autologous IVF cycles
 
blastocyst transfer
 
blastulation day
 
candidate variables
 
clinical pregnancy
 
Clinical pregnancy rate
 
day 5
 
embryo-endometrium synchrony
 
final model
 
Initial bivariate analysis
 
multiple logistic regression
 
multivariate models
 
Pre-ovulatory serum P level
 
preovulatory serum P
 
preovulatory serum P level
 
Private fertility center
 
Retrospective study
 
significant variables
 

Bruce S Shapiro