Article

Prediagnostic plasma C-peptide and pancreatic cancer risk in men and women

Department of Nutrition , Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention (Impact Factor: 4.32). 11/2007; 16(10):2101-9. DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-07-0182
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Hyperinsulinemia and insulin resistance have been proposed as underlying mechanisms for the increase in pancreatic cancer among long-standing diabetics and obese individuals. An association between serum insulin levels and pancreatic cancer risk was reported in a recent study, but the population was composed of heavy smokers and their findings may not be generalizable to nonsmokers.
Pancreatic cancer cases and matched controls were obtained from four large-scale prospective cohorts to examine the association between prediagnostic plasma levels of C-peptide and insulin and pancreatic cancer. One hundred ninety-seven pancreatic cancer cases were diagnosed during a maximum of 20 years of follow-up, after excluding cases diagnosed within 2 years of blood collection or with baseline diabetes. We estimated OR and confidence intervals (CI) using conditional logistic regression with adjustment for pancreatic cancer risk factors.
Prediagnostic plasma C-peptide was positively associated with pancreatic cancer risk (OR, 1.52; 95% CI, 0.87-2.64, highest compared with the lowest quartile, P(trend) = 0.005). The association was not modified by body mass index or physical activity but seemed to be slightly stronger among never smokers than ever smokers. Fasting C-peptide and insulin were not related to pancreatic cancer; however, we observed a strong linear association for nonfasting C-peptide and pancreatic cancer (OR, 4.24; 95% CI, 1.30-13.8, highest versus lowest quartile, P(trend) < 0.001).
Based on our finding of a strong positive association with nonfasting C-peptide levels, we propose that insulin levels in the postprandial state may be the relevant exposure for pancreatic carcinogenesis; however, other studies will need to examine this possibility.

Download full-text

Full-text

Available from: Michael Pollak, Aug 29, 2015
0 Followers
 · 
94 Views
  • Source
    • "As with colorectal cancer, studies are divided for breast cancer (no association [48–56]; positive association [57–64]), endometrial cancer (no association [65,66]; positive association [67–69]) and prostate cancer (no association [70–72]; positive association [73,74]). Two studies of pancreatic cancer both found a positive association [75,76]. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Experimental, epidemiological and clinical evidence implicates insulin resistance and its accompanying hyperinsulinaemia in the development of cancer, but the relative importance of these disturbances in cancer remains unclear. There are, however, theoretical mechanisms by which hyperinsulinaemia could amplify such growth-promoting effects as insulin may have, as well as the growth-promoting effects of other, more potent, growth factors. Hyperinsulinaemia may also induce other changes, particularly in the IGF (insulin-like growth factor) system, that could promote cell proliferation and survival. Several factors can independently modify both cancer risk and insulin resistance, including subclinical inflammation and obesity. The possibility that some of the effects of hyperinsulinaemia might then augment pro-carcinogenic changes associated with disturbances in these factors emphasizes how, rather than being a single causative factor, insulin resistance may be most usefully viewed as one strand in a network of interacting disturbances that promote the development and progression of cancer.
    Clinical Science 11/2009; 118(5):315-32. DOI:10.1042/CS20090399 · 5.63 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "Diabetes also has been linked to greater risk of pancreatic cancer, and meta-analyses suggest that this link may be causal, or at least that metabolic conditions predisposing to diabetes precede pancreatic cancer [2, 3]. Four prospective studies that examined banked serum have linked higher fasting glucose levels with subsequent risk of pancreatic cancer several years later [4–7], and pre-diagnostic plasma C-peptide levels have been linked to greater risk of pancreatic cancer [8]. In vitro, insulin increases pancreatic cancer cell proliferation in a dose-dependent manner [9]. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: We examined the associations between sweets, sweetened and unsweetened beverages, and sugars and pancreatic cancer risk. We conducted a population-based case-control study (532 cases, 1,701 controls) and used multivariate logistic regression models to calculate odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). Because associations were often different by sex, we present results for men and women combined and separately. Among men, greater intakes of total and specific sweets were associated with pancreatic cancer risk (total sweets: OR = 1.9, 95% CI: 1.0, 3.6; sweet condiments: OR = 1.9, 95% CI: 1.2, 3.1; chocolate candy: OR = 2.4, 95% CI: 1.1, 5.0; other mixed candy bars: OR = 3.3, 95% CI: 1.5, 7.3 for 1 + servings/day versus none/rarely). Sweets were not consistently associated with risk among women. Sweetened beverages were not associated with increased pancreatic cancer risk. In contrast, low-calorie soft drinks were associated with increased risk among men only; while other low-/non-caloric beverages (e.g., coffee, tea, and water) were unassociated with risk. Of the three sugars assessed (lactose, fructose, and sucrose), only the milk sugar lactose was associated with pancreatic cancer risk (OR = 2.0, 95% CI: 1.5, 2.7 comparing extreme quartiles). These results provide limited support for the hypothesis that sweets or sugars increase pancreatic cancer risk.
    Cancer Causes and Control 04/2009; 20(6):835-46. DOI:10.1007/s10552-009-9323-1 · 2.96 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: A substantial body of evidence links sex hormones, diet, excess body weight and physical activity to the risk of developing cancer at several sites common in affluent countries. The hypothesis that high circulating levels of insulin could be the underlying factor increasing cancer risk has been proposed. Epidemiological studies on markers of hyper-insulinaemia and cancer are reviewed and summarized. Studies of cancers of the colon and rectum, pancreas, breast, and endometrium examining the association with blood levels of C-peptide, insulin, glucose, glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) were searched in PubMed. Multivariate, adjusted relative risks (RR) and their 95% confidence intervals were abstracted and summarized by meta-analyses. Most of the studies identified were cohorts that relied on measurements obtained at baseline or assessed in blood stored at low temperature several years before the onset of cancer. The meta-analyses showed excess risks of colorectal and pancreatic cancers associated with higher levels of circulating C-peptide/insulin and with markers of glycaemia. Significant heterogeneity was found among four epidemiological studies of endometrial cancer and C-peptide giving a summary RR compatible with no association. Overall breast cancer risk was significantly higher in the upper categories of C-peptide/insulin, however, the excess derived entirely from retrospective studies. Current evidence suggests that subjects who develop colorectal and pancreatic cancers have increased pre-diagnostic blood levels of insulin and glucose.
    Archives of Physiology and Biochemistry 03/2008; 114(1):63-70. DOI:10.1080/13813450801954451
Show more