Article

Is alpha-synuclein pathology a target for treatment of neurodegenerative disorders?

JSW-Research, Institute of experimental Pharmacology, Rankengasse 28a, A-8020, Graz, Austria.
Current Alzheimer Research (Impact Factor: 3.8). 10/2007; 4(4):446-57. DOI: 10.2174/156720507781788783
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Alpha-synuclein is the main constituent of intra-neuronal Lewy bodies, which are characteristic of Parkinson's disease, but aggregates are also found as axonal inclusions. Alpha-synuclein pathology is found together with beta-amyloid plaques and neurofibrillary tangles in Alzheimer's disease and other neurodegenerative disorders. In spite of the fact that the biological function of this synaptic protein is not known so far, there is an increasing body of evidence indicating an interaction with amyloid peptides, but also with tau-hyperphosphorylation. A high proportion of alpha-synuclein purified from Lewy bodies is phosphorylated on Ser129. There are still different opinions about the toxicity of the alpha-synuclein aggregates. Alpha-synuclein seems to influence different intracellular signaling pathways which are in direct relation to defense mechanisms against reactive oxygen species or apoptosis. It is obvious that overproduction of alpha-synuclein, but also different mutations, are inducing the formation of aggregates. Because of the possible link to neurodegeneration, different attempts have been made to counteract alpha-synuclein aggregation. An interesting approach is utilizing beta-synuclein, a biological factor, with an aminoacid sequence closely resembling that of alpha-synuclein. Proof of concept studies indicated that overexpression of beta-synuclein is able to counteract alpha-synuclein aggregation in a transgenic animal model, while also ameliorating functional deficits. As an alternative approach, the use of low molecular beta-synuclein N-terminal peptide derivatives has been considered. Several of these structures displayed clear neuroprotective activities in tissue culture models of neurodegeneration, including beta-amyloid toxicity. Therefore it has been speculated that these compounds might have a broad therapeutic efficacy in different neurodegenerative disorders. A proof of concept study in hAPP-transgenic animals resulted in a highly significant decrease in beta-amyloid plaque load, an increase in soluble beta-amyloid peptides and a decrease in insoluble forms. There was also significant improvement of cognitive deficits in this APP transgenic mouse model following intranasal but also peripheral treatment with three of these compounds. From this study it is concluded that the observed effects of the peptides derived from beta-synuclein N-terminus are depending on both, a direct interaction with aggregation of proteins, but also with stimulation of anti-apoptotic and anti-oxidative intracellular signaling pathways.

1 Follower
 · 
81 Views
  • Annals of Neurology 07/2012; 72(1):4-5. DOI:10.1002/ana.23655 · 11.91 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: No available treatments slow or halt progression of multiple system atrophy, which is a rare, progressive, fatal neurological disorder. In a mouse model of multiple system atrophy, rifampicin inhibited formation of α-synuclein fibrils, the neuropathological hallmark of the disease. We aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of rifampicin in patients with multiple system atrophy. In this randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial we recruited participants aged 30-80 years with possible or probable multiple system atrophy from ten US medical centres. Eligible participants were randomly assigned (1:1) via computer-generated permuted block randomisation to rifampicin 300 mg twice daily or matching placebo (50 mg riboflavin capsules), stratified by subtype (parkinsonian vs cerebellar), with a block size of four. The primary outcome was rate of change (slope analysis) from baseline to 12 months in Unified Multiple System Atrophy Rating Scale (UMSARS) I score, analysed in all participants with at least one post-baseline measurement. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01287221. Between April 22, 2011, and April 19, 2012, we randomly assigned 100 participants (50 to rifampicin and 50 to placebo). Four participants in the rifampicin group and five in the placebo group withdrew from study prematurely. Results of the preplanned interim analysis (n=15 in each group) of the primary endpoint showed that futility criteria had been met, and the trial was stopped (the mean rate of change [slope analysis] of UMSARS I score was 0·62 points [SD 0·85] per month in the rifampicin group vs 0·47 points [0·48] per month in the placebo group; futility p=0·032; efficacy p=0·76). At the time of study termination, 49 participants in the rifampicin group and 50 in the placebo group had follow-up data and were included in the final analysis. The primary endpoint was 0·5 points (SD 0·7) per month for rifampicin and 0·5 points (0·5) per month for placebo (difference 0·0, 95% CI -0·24 to 0·24; p=0·82). Three (6%) of 50 participants in the rifampicin group and 12 (24%) of 50 in the placebo group had one or more serious adverse events; none was thought to be related to treatment. Our results show that rifampicin does not slow or halt progression of multiple system atrophy. Despite the negative result, the trial does provide information that could be useful in the design of future studies assessing potential disease modifying therapies in patients with multiple system atrophy. National Institutes of Health, Mayo Clinic Center for Translational Science Activities, and Mayo Funds.
    The Lancet Neurology 02/2014; DOI:10.1016/S1474-4422(13)70301-6 · 21.82 Impact Factor
  • Source