Article

Sharing electronic laboratory results in a patient portal--a feasibility pilot.

Partners Information Systems, Partners HealthCare, Boston, MA, USA.
Studies in health technology and informatics 02/2007; 129(Pt 1):18-22. DOI: 10.3233/978-1-58603-774-1-18
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Surveys of patients consistently demonstrate a very strong interest in having secure electronic access to their own laboratory test results. In recent years, a number of health care providers and lab service centers have offered this capability, which now extends to millions of patients in the United States. Yet, little has been published on the methods of making lab results available. This case report identifies the objectives, methods, and results of a feasibility pilot conducted at Partners Healthcare from May to September, 2006. A candidate set of results were identified, approved for release, programmed into Patient Gateway, Partners' secure patient portal, and studied. Patient and practice feedback was positive. No noticeable rise in patient concerns was observed by practice staff or through patient surveys. One-half of patients who viewed results accessed reference information linked to a result. Organizational and practice-level issues necessary to support continued rollout are described.

0 Bookmarks
 · 
86 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Electronic health records (EHRs) and EHR-connected patient portals offer patient-provider collaboration tools for visit-based care. During a randomized controlled trial, primary care patients completed pre-visit electronic journals (eJournals) containing EHR-based medication, allergies, and diabetes (study arm 1) or health maintenance, personal history, and family history (study arm 2) topics to share with their provider. Assessment with surveys and usage data showed that among 2027 patients invited to complete an eJournal, 70.3% submitted one and 71.1% of submitters had one opened by their provider. Surveyed patients reported they felt more prepared for the visit (55.9%) and their provider had more accurate information about them (58.0%). More arm 1 versus arm 2 providers reported that eJournals were visit-time neutral (100% vs 53%; p<0.013), helpful to patients in visit preparation (66% vs 20%; p=0.082), and would recommend them to colleagues (78% vs 22%; p=0.0143). eJournal integration into practice warrants further study.
    Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 01/2010; 17(5):502-6. · 3.57 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The Information Technology (IT) roadmap for personalized medicine requires Electronic Health Records (EHRs), extension of Healthcare IT (HIT) standards, and understanding of how genetics/genomics should be integrated into the clinical applications. For reduced overall costs and development times, these three initiatives should run in parallel. EHRs must contain structured data and infrastructure that enables quality analysis, Clinical Decision Support (CDS) and messaging within the healthcare information network. Fortunately, as a result of sustained financial commitment to nongenetic-based healthcare, the industry has HIT data standards and understanding of EHR functionality that improves patient safety and outcomes while reducing overall healthcare costs. However, the HIT standards and EHR functional requirements, needed for personalized medicine, are only beginning to support simple genetic tests and need significant extension. In addition, our understanding of the clinical implications of genomic data is evolving and translation of new discovery into clinical care remains a challenge. Therefore, priority areas include CDS, educational resources, and knowledgebases for the EHR, clinical and research data warehouses, messaging frameworks, and continued review of healthcare policies and regulations supporting personalized medicine. Where core infrastructure remains to be developed and implemented, funding is needed for pilot projects, data standards, policy, and stakeholder collaboration.
    Human Mutation 02/2011; 32(5):512-6. · 5.21 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Abstract Objective: To describe parent feedback and intention to use the patient portal related to their children's health records after a facilitated learning session. Patient portals are Internet-based, self-service models for health account information and records that allow patients or parents to be more proactive in their healthcare. Materials and Methods: A navigator demonstrated the patient portal to parents using on-site kiosks at a pediatric clinic. Parents ≥18 years of age completed an institutional review board-approved survey. Results: Of those approached, 171 (54%) parents participated in the demonstration; 64 (37%) completed surveys. Average age was 28 years (standard deviation 7), and most were white (26, 40%) or Hispanic (14, 22%). Most (46, 72%) did not know about the patient portal prior to demonstration; of those who did, only five (28%) had used it. Following demonstration, the majority (59, 92%) thought the patient portal was easy to use. Parents planned to view medical records and laboratory results but disliked having separate accounts for each child and the lack of a "symptom checker." Many (44, 69%) planned for future use. The majority (62, 97%) found the navigator helpful, and (37, 58%) wanted access to the patient portal via on-site kiosks. Conclusions: Although most parents had no prior experience with the patient portal, they were satisfied overall with ease of use and offered features. Clinics should consider (1) hands-on demonstrations of the patient portal to encourage understanding and use and (2) alternative access venues if home computers are not available.
    Telemedicine and e-Health 09/2013; · 1.40 Impact Factor