Article

The Influence of Ambient Speech on Adult Speech Productions through Unintentional Imitation

Fonds National de la Recherche Scientifique, Bruxelles, Belgique.
Phonetica (Impact Factor: 0.42). 02/2007; 64(2-3):145-73. DOI: 10.1159/0000107914
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT This paper deals with the influence of ambient speech on individual speech productions. A methodological framework is defined to gather the experimental data necessary to feed computer models simulating self-organisation in phonological systems. Two experiments were carried out. Experiment 1 was run on French native speakers from two regiolects of Belgium: two from Liège and two from Brussels. When exposed to the way of speaking of the other regiolect via loudspeakers, the speakers of one regiolect produced vowels that were significantly different from their typical realisations, and significantly closer to the way of speaking specific of the other regiolect. Experiment 2 achieved a replication of the results for 8 Mons speakers hearing a Liège speaker. A significant part of the imitative effect remained up to 10 min after the end of the exposure to the other regiolect productions. As a whole, the results suggest that: (i) imitation occurs automatically and unintentionally, (ii) the modified realisations leave a memory trace, in which case the mechanism may be better defined as 'mimesis' than as 'imitation'. The potential effects of multiple imitative speech interactions on sound change are discussed in this paper, as well as the implications for a general theory of phonetic implementation and phonetic representation.

Download full-text

Full-text

Available from: Véronique Delvaux, Jun 17, 2015
1 Follower
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: A surprising dissimilarity is attested in the perception of approximants by speakers of American and Standard Southern British English. Eighteen subjects (6 AE and 12 SSBE) performed an identification task in which they judged whether stimuli were more like r or w. The stimuli comprised five sounds, copy-synthesised from a source r, where the values of F2 and F3 we adjusted to fall between the frequencies typical for ["turned r"] and [w]. The only significant difference between the two dialect groups' performance occurred with a token in which F3 was at a frequency typical for r and F2 was lowered to that of w. AE and SSBE speakers identified this token as r 90% and 59% of the time, respectively. This is unexpected as r in both dialects is characterised by a low F3. However, the difference may be due to the existence of the 'labiodental' variant of r in SSBE. As this variant does not have a low F3, SSBE speakers must tolerate a wider diversity of r-types than AE speakers. Therefore, the r category in SSBE may be becoming increasingly defined by F2, rather than F3, which also has implications for the future production of r in this accent.
    The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 06/2008; 123(5):3319. DOI:10.1121/1.2933789 · 1.56 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Twenty women from Christchurch, New Zealand and sixteen from Columbus Ohio (dialect region U.S. Midland) participated in a bimodal lexical naming task where they repeated monosyllabic words after four speakers from four regional dialects: New Zealand, Australia, U.S. Inland North and U.S. Midland. The resulting utterances were acoustically analyzed, and presented to listeners on Amazon Mechanical Turk in an AXB task. Convergence is observed, but differs depending on the dialect of the speaker, the dialect of the model, the particular word class being shadowed, and the order in which dialects are presented to participants. We argue that these patterns are generally consistent with findings that convergence is promoted by a large phonetic distance between shadower and model (Babel, 2010, contra Kim, Horton & Bradlow, 2011), and greater existing variability in a vowel class (Babel, 2012). The results also suggest that more comparisons of accommodation towards different dialects are warranted, and that the investigation of the socio-indexical meaning of specific linguistic forms in context is a promising avenue for understanding variable selectivity in convergence.
    Frontiers in Psychology 05/2015; 6. DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00546 · 2.80 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Do speakers' accents change from day to day? This paper examines this question through the lens of voice onset time (VOT). We examine whether VOT within individual speakers shows time dependence—daily fluctuations, longer-term time trends, or both—by examining spontaneous speech from 11 English speakers on three months of the reality TV show Big Brother UK. We build statistical models of time dependence in VOT for each speaker, controlling for a range of other factors, and find that all speakers show daily fluctuations in VOT, for both voiced and voiceless stops, while longer-term time trends (weeks–months) are present in about half of cases. Together with previous work, these results suggest that pronunciation (at least VOT) does change from day to day, possibly due to accumulated accommodation effects, but that these shifts often do not accumulate into longer-term change.
    18th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences; 08/2015