Article

Deficits in facial affect recognition among antisocial populations: A meta-analysis

National Institute of Mental Health, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA.
Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews (Impact Factor: 10.28). 02/2008; 32(3):454-65. DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2007.08.003
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Individuals with disorders marked by antisocial behavior frequently show deficits in recognizing displays of facial affect. Antisociality may be associated with specific deficits in identifying fearful expressions, which would implicate dysfunction in neural structures that subserve fearful expression processing. A meta-analysis of 20 studies was conducted to assess: (a) if antisocial populations show any consistent deficits in recognizing six emotional expressions; (b) beyond any generalized impairment, whether specific fear recognition deficits are apparent; and (c) if deficits in fear recognition are a function of task difficulty. Results show a robust link between antisocial behavior and specific deficits in recognizing fearful expressions. This impairment cannot be attributed solely to task difficulty. These results suggest dysfunction among antisocial individuals in specified neural substrates, namely the amygdala, involved in processing fearful facial affect.

Download full-text

Full-text

Available from: Abigail A Marsh, Aug 28, 2015
2 Followers
 · 
884 Views
  • Source
    • "When facial emotion recognition ability is impaired, the individual may not benefit from receiving the potent and social behaviour-regulating reinforcers provided by the facial expressions of other people (Blair, 1995). In turn, the inability to receive guidance from this important social information may result in interpersonal functioning difficulties due to a reduced capacity to monitor the effect of one's behaviour on others and by a failure to modulate behaviour appropriately and in an interpersonally sensitive manner (Beer et al., 2003; Marsh & Blair, 2008). Indeed, there is evidence to suggest that facial expressions exhibited by others help generate negative self-conscious emotions (e.g., embarrassment, shame, and guilt) in individuals by helping them become aware that their behaviour is harmful or inappropriate and thus, transgressive (see Beer et al., 2003). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Shame and guilt are closely related self-conscious emotions of negative affect that give rise to divergent self-regulatory and motivational behaviours. While guilt-proneness has demonstrated positive relationships with self-report measures of empathy and adaptive interpersonal functioning, shame-proneness tends to be unrelated or inversely related to empathy and is associated with interpersonal difficulties. At present, no research has examined relationships between shame and guilt-proneness with facial emotion recognition ability. Participants (N = 363) completed measures of shame and guilt-proneness along with a facial emotion recognition task which assessed the ability to identify displays of anger, sadness, happiness, fear, disgust, and shame. Guilt-proneness was consistently positively associated with facial emotion recognition ability. In contrast, shame-proneness was unrelated to capacity for facial emotion recognition. Findings provide support for theory arguing that guilt and empathy operate synergistically and may also help explain the inverse relationship between guilt-proneness and propensity for aggressive behaviour.
    Cognition and Emotion 08/2015; DOI:10.1080/02699931.2015.1072497 · 2.52 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "As we have seen throughout this paper, many clinical descriptions of psychopathy have emphasized the inability to experience emotions or appreciate the emotional meaning of events (Blair, 1995; Cleckley, 1988; Kiehl, 2006). In this respect, several authors have proposed that psychopathy involves a selective defi cit affecting mostly negative emotional reactivity (Marsh & Blair, 2008), and attribute the behavior shown by psychopaths to their insensitivity to punishment signals (Patrick, 1994). Emotional defi cits to negative emotional stimuli have been associated with high scores on CU traits, BIS hypoactivity and Factor I (Wallace et al., 2009). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Research with psychopathic samples using the technique of evoked potentials is rather limited and almost exclusively concerned with the study of the P300 component; no studies have been found (to date) that assess shorter wave latencies. This research focuses on the emotional and attentional processes in young people with psychopathic characteristics, using the evoked potential technique in short-wave latency (N100). The experimental group consisted of 22 subjects; all of them met the psychopathic criteria of the Antisocial Process Screening Device (APSD) and the Psychopathy Checklist: Youth Version (PCL: YV). The control sample consisted of 25 subjects, all of them scoring less than 15 points in APSD. In the experimental group, the mechanisms responsible for processing the pleasant stimulation responded earlier and with more intensity (on the N100); premium positivity bias on negativity. This emotional deficit found in the literature on psychopathy in adults is also found in young people.
    Psicothema 08/2015; 27(3):235-240. DOI:10.7334/psicothema2014.201 · 0.96 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "We tested emotion understanding as a general index of emotion processing across the basic emotions . Although a meta-analysis conducted by Marsh and Blair (2008) reported significant deficits specifically for fearful faces within antisocial samples, a recent meta-analysis with community and clinical samples showed deficits across both positive and negative emotions, suggestive of a general rather than specific emotion processing impairment (Dawel , O'Kearney, McKone, & Palermo, 2012). In contrast to CU traits, we expected impulsivity/ irresponsibility to be associated with early appropriate mind-related comments indirectly via ToM. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Problems in understanding other people's mental states may relate to distinct personality traits that are associated with early externalizing behavior. A distinction between theory of mind (ToM) and empathy has proven important in shedding light on the problems in understanding other minds encountered by children high on callous-unemotional (CU) traits and exhibiting impulsivity. The aim of this study was to investigate whether children's early ToM and emotion understanding abilities predicted CU traits and impulsivity at age 10. A further aim was to explore whether the quality of the parent-child relationship very early in the development indirectly or directly predicted the children's CU traits and impulsivity. We examined whether ToM and empathy skills might differentially relate to personality traits associated with externalizing behaviors (i.e., impulsivity and CU traits). We examined these relations over time in a longitudinal cohort of 96 boys and girls using follow-back analyses, incorporating measures of maternal mind-mindedness (appropriate mind-related talk) to examine the possible role of parent-child interaction quality. Appropriate mind-related talk indirectly predicted CU traits (at age 10 years) via its effect on children's emotion understanding. ToM predicted impulsive/irresponsible traits, but ceased to be significant when controlling for externalizing behaviors. The present findings demonstrate that parents who remark appropriately on their infant's mental states may help the child to understand emotions and may mold an empathic understanding of others, thereby preventing CU traits. © 2015 The Authors. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Association for Child and Adolescent Mental Health.
    Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry 07/2015; DOI:10.1111/jcpp.12445 · 5.67 Impact Factor
Show more