Article

Psychosocial and behavioral impact of genetic counseling and testing.

Health Outcomes and Behavior Program, H Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL 33612, USA.
Breast disease 27:97-108. pp.97-108
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Over a decade has passed since the clinical availability of BRCA1/2 mutation testing for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer (HBOC). The purpose of this article is to review key areas of psychosocial and behavioral research related to genetic counseling and testing for BRCA1/2 mutations. Special attention will be given to understudied issues within each of these key areas. Where appropriate, the article will also highlight the clinical and research experiences of the authors. The first area that will be reviewed is the impact of genetic testing on psychological well-being. This will be followed by a brief discussion of a practical assessment strategy for psychosocial distress in clinical settings. Next, published data on the uptake of risk management options based on genetic testing results as well as the psychosocial impact of these behaviors will be reviewed. Thirdly, research focused on understanding the decision making at various points in the genetic counseling and testing process will also be examined. Finally, the available research on genetic counseling and testing in minority communities will be presented. By recognizing and addressing the psychosocial and behavioral issues faced by patients undergoing BRCA1/2 genetic counseling and testing, researchers and providers have the potential to maximize opportunities for prevention, early detection, and healthy coping.

0 0
 · 
0 Bookmarks
 · 
20 Views

Keywords

available research
 
behavioral research
 
BRCA1/2 mutation testing
 
BRCA1/2 mutations
 
brief discussion
 
clinical availability
 
first area
 
genetic counseling
 
genetic testing
 
genetic testing results
 
key areas
 
patients undergoing BRCA1/2 genetic counseling
 
practical assessment strategy
 
psychosocial distress
 
psychosocial impact
 
research experiences
 
researchers
 
review key areas
 
risk management options
 
testing process