Frustrated and confused: the American public rates its cancer-related information-seeking experiences.

Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD 20892-7344, USA.
Journal of General Internal Medicine (Impact Factor: 3.42). 04/2008; 23(3):223-8. DOI: 10.1007/s11606-007-0406-y
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Ensuring access to high-quality cancer-related information is important for the success of cancer prevention and control efforts.
We conducted a population-based assessment of the barriers faced by people searching for cancer information.
Cross-sectional data from the National Cancer Institute's 2003 Health Information National Trends Survey.
A nationally representative sample of individuals in the USA (n = 6,369).
We assessed whether respondents had ever sought cancer-related information and examined ratings of their information-seeking experiences and beliefs regarding causes of cancer and its prevention. Linear and logistic regression models were estimated to determine predictors of negative experiences and associations between experiences and cancer beliefs.
Nearly one half (44.9%) of Americans had searched for cancer information. Many reported negative experiences, including the search process requiring a lot of effort (47.7%), expressing frustration (41.3%), and concerns about the quality of the information found (57.7%). Respondents lacking health insurance or a high school education experienced the greatest difficulty. Compared to those reporting the most positive experiences, information seekers reporting more negative experiences were more likely to report that almost everything caused cancer [odds ratio (OR) 2.0, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.5-2.6], that not much can be done to prevent cancer (OR 2.7, 95% CI 1.9-3.8), and that it is hard to know which cancer prevention recommendations to follow (OR 3.2, 95% CI 2.3-4.5).
While a significant proportion of the American public searches for cancer information, suboptimal experiences are common. Facilitation of information seeking will be critical for promoting informed decision making in cancer prevention and control.


Available from: Bradford W Hesse, Apr 17, 2015
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Objective: Spanish-monolingual Latinos account for 13% of U.S. residents, and experience multiple barriers to effective health communication. Information intermediaries/proxies mediate between the linguistically-isolated and healthcare providers. This study characterizes the information needs of surrogate callers and their subjects to a U.S.-based Spanish-language radio health program. Methods: Content analysis of calls placed (N=281 calls). Results: Women made 70% of calls; 39.1% of calls were on behalf of children, 11.0% on behalf of parents/older adults, 18.5% on behalf of spouses/siblings/contemporary adults. Most common topics were disease symptoms/conditions (19.6%), cancer (13.9%), and reproduction/sexuality (12.9%). Calls for children were more likely than those for parents/other adults to pertain to current illness symptoms or conditions; calls for parents were more likely to be about cancer/chronic conditions. Half of all calls sought clarification about a previous medical encounter. Conclusion: Information-seeking surrogates may represent a useful strategy for linguistic minorities to overcome structural and individual barriers to health information access. Results suggest that Latinos are willing to seek information on behalf of friends and family and highlight the need for improved, culturally and linguistically appropriate health communication sources. Practice Implications: Leveraging Latinos’ natural familial social networks/willingness to share information may improve dissemination of culturally-and-linguistically-appropriate health information. Further implications for patient activation and doctor-patient communication are discussed.
    Health Promotion Practice 02/2015; DOI:10.1177/1524839915574246 · 0.55 Impact Factor
  • Source
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Providing information about cancer prevention might increase awareness of prevention and promote preventive behaviours. A better understanding about the prevalence and preferences of obtaining information about cancer might help to identify targeted individuals and design effective strategies for promoting cancer-preventive behaviours. Thus, the present study examined the prevalence and correlates of obtaining information about cancer among Japanese adults, and described preferences including source and content. Data were analysed for 3,058 Japanese adults (mean age 45.0 ± 13.4 years) who responded to an Internet-based cross-sectional survey. The data included whether information about cancer had been obtained, sources, preference for content, sociodemographic variables, health status, and cancer histories. Force-entry logistic regression analysis was used. Overall, 46.7% of respondents had obtained information about cancer. Gender, age, and education level were statistically significant correlates of doing so. Women were more likely to obtain information (OR = 1.97) as were older age groups (40-49: OR = 1.54, 50-59: OR = 2.27, 60-69: OR = 3.83), those with higher education (2 years college or equivalent degree: OR = 1.31, college graduate or higher: OR = 1.48) and those with having cancer histories (personal: OR = 3.52, family: OR = 1.57, friends/co-worker: OR = 2.09). The most prevalent source of information about cancer was mass media. Content of prevention is most needed among inconsistent contents with the frequently obtained contents. Less than half of the respondents information about cancer. The finding suggests that better health communication strategies would be necessary to inform Japanese people about cancer. Understanding which subgroups were less likely to obtain information and preferences of information might be effective in promoting cancer prevention.
    BMC Public Health 12/2015; 15(1):1510. DOI:10.1186/s12889-015-1510-2 · 2.32 Impact Factor