Article

Memory formation in the motor cortex ipsilateral to a training hand

Human Cortical Physiology Section and Stroke Neurorehabilitation Clinic, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20817, USA.
Cerebral Cortex (Impact Factor: 8.67). 07/2008; 18(6):1395-406. DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhm173
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Cortical reorganization within the primary motor cortex (M1) contralateral to a practicing hand has been extensively investigated. The extent to which the ipsilateral M1 participates in these plastic changes is not known. Here, we evaluated the influence of unilateral hand practice on the organization of the M1 ipsilateral and contralateral to the practicing hand in healthy human subjects. Index finger movements elicited by single-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) delivered to each M1 were evaluated before and after practice of unilateral voluntary index finger abduction motions. Practice increased the proportion and acceleration of TMS-evoked movements in the trained direction and the amplitude of motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) in the abduction agonist first dorsal interosseous (FDI) muscle in the practicing hand and decreased the proportion and acceleration of TMS-evoked abduction movements and MEP amplitudes in the abduction agonist FDI in the opposite resting hand. Our findings indicate that unilateral hand practice specifically weakened the representation of the practiced movement in the ipsilateral M1 to an extent proportional to the strengthening effect in the contralateral M1, a result that varied with the practicing hand's position. These results suggest a more prominent involvement of interacting bilateral motor networks in motor memory formation and probably acquisition of unimanual motor skills than previously thought.

Download full-text

Full-text

Available from: Riccardo Mazzocchio, Jul 31, 2015
1 Follower
 · 
122 Views
  • Source
    • "Then, following the imperative signal, the amplitude of MEPs progressively increased . This increase was more pronounced when the imperative signal had indicated a left-hand response, compared to when it had indicated a right-hand response (left-hand nonselected), reflecting a selective buildup of activity in the motor cortex controlling the forthcoming response (Duque et al., 2008; Michelet et al., 2010). Based on bounded-accumulation models, two predictions exist on how reward could regulate the buildup of motor activity during response selection (Fig. 1A). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Current models of decision making postulate that action selection entails a competition within motor-related areas. According to this view, during action selection, motor activity should integrate cognitive information (e.g., reward) that drives our decisions. We tested this hypothesis in humans by measuring motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) in a left finger muscle during motor preparation in a hand selection task, in which subjects performed left or right key presses according to an imperative signal. This signal was either obvious or ambiguous, but subjects were always asked to react as fast as possible. When the signal was really indistinct, any key press was regarded as correct, so subjects could respond "at random" in those trials. A score based on reaction times was provided after each correct response, and subjects were told they would receive a monetary reward proportional to their final score. Importantly, the scores were either equitable for both hands or favored implicitly left responses (reward(neutral) and reward(biased) blocks, respectively). We found that subjects selected their left hand more often in the reward(biased) than in the reward(neutral) condition, particularly after ambiguous signals. Moreover, left MEPs were larger, as soon as the signal appeared, in the reward(biased) than in the reward(neutral) conditions. During the course of motor preparation, this effect became strongest following ambiguous signals, a condition in which subjects' choices relied strongly on the reward. These results indicate that motor activity is shaped by a cognitive variable that drives our choices, possibly in the context of a competition taking place within motor-related areas.
    The Journal of Neuroscience : The Official Journal of the Society for Neuroscience 12/2012; 32(50):18124-36. DOI:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1701-12.2012 · 6.75 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "An alternative explanation for the conflicting results might be differences in the characteristics of the tasks employed (Bonato et al. 1996, Carroll et al. 2008, Duque et al. 2008, Lee et al. 2010). Participants in the study by Duque et al. (2008) performed repetitive finger movements at 1 Hz for 30 min, and Bonato et al. (1996) required subjects to produce repetitive maximal-speed finger movements for 1 min. The performance of such cyclic tasks has the potential to induce central fatigue and cause substantial reduction in MEP response in the trained limb (Brasil-Neto et al. 1994, Zanette et al. 1995). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: AIM: In previous studies, unilateral ballistic training either increased or decreased corticospinal excitability for the untrained opposite limb. The objective here was to investigate whether these discrepancies can be explained by methodological differences such as the intensity of stimulation assessing excitability, or the timing of excitability testing after training. METHODS: Motor evoked potentials (MEP) were elicited by stimulating the ipsilateral cortex at high-intensity (70% MEPmax) and low-intensity (20% MEPmax) at specific time-points after performance of 300 ballistic movements of the index finger. RESULTS: Ballistic practice significantly facilitated MEP size for high-intensity stimuli, whereas responses to low intensity stimulation were variable. MEP sizes at individual time-points were not significantly facilitated until 4min after training, although there was no difference between early and late responses when grouped over multiple time-points. CONCLUSIONS: The data indicate that previous discrepancies in ipsilateral responses to ballistic training cannot be attributed to specific procedures used to assess corticospinal excitability as there was no tendency towards depression of MEP amplitude at any point post exercise for both testing intensities. This suggests that other experimental factors such as locus of attention or availability of visual feedback are more likely to account for the discrepancies. © 2012 The Authors Acta Physiologica © 2012 Scandinavian Physiological Society.
    Acta Physiologica 10/2012; 207(2). DOI:10.1111/apha.12032 · 4.25 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "Based on these physiological findings, repetitive TMS has been successfully used to improve motor performance and motor learning [4] [11] [37] [41]. Beyond the influence on the motor system there is growing evidence showing transient neuronal facilitation and cognitive process enhancement due to rTMS in healthy subjects. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: In schizophrenia patients negative symptoms and cognitive impairment often persist despite treatment with second generation antipsychotics leading to reduced quality of life and psychosocial functioning. One core cognitive deficit is impaired working memory (WM) suggesting malfunctioning of the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. High frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) has been used to transiently facilitate or consolidate neuronal processes. Pilot studies using rTMS have demonstrated improvement of psychopathology in other psychiatric disorders, but a systematic investigation of working memory effects outlasting the stimulation procedure has not been performed so far. The aim of our study was to explore the effect of a 3-week high frequency active or sham 10Hz rTMS on cognition, specifically on working memory, in schizophrenia patients (n=25) in addition to antipsychotic therapy and in healthy controls (n=22). We used functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to compare activation patterns during verbal WM (letter 2-back task) before and after 3-weeks treatment with rTMS. Additionally, other cognitive tasks were conducted. 10Hz rTMS was applied over the left posterior middle frontal gyrus (EEG electrode location F3) with an intensity of 110% of the individual resting motor threshold (RMT) over a total of 15 sessions. Participants recruited the common fronto- parietal and subcortical WM network. Multiple regression analyses revealed no significant activation differences over time in any contrast or sample. According to the ANOVAs for repeated measures performance remained without alterations in all groups. This is the first fMRI study that has systematically investigated this topic within a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind design, contrasting the effects in schizophrenia patients and healthy controls.
    Behavioural brain research 09/2012; 237C:300-307. DOI:10.1016/j.bbr.2012.09.034 · 3.39 Impact Factor
Show more