Article

Histopathologic spectrum and immunohistochemical diagnosis of amebic meningoencephalitis.

Infectious Disease Pathology Branch, National Center for Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1405 Clifton Road NE, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA.
Modern Pathology (Impact Factor: 6.36). 01/2008; 20(12):1230-7. DOI: 10.1038/modpathol.3800973
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Traditionally, Naegleria fowleri infections are labeled primary amebic meningoencephalitis because of prominent meningeal neutrophilic inflammation. Acanthamoeba spp. and Balamuthia mandrillaris are labeled granulomatous amebic encephalitis because of parenchymal granulomatous inflammation. We compared histopathologic and immunohistochemical features of 18 cases with central nervous system free-living ameba infections. Immunohistochemical assays using polyclonal antibodies that reacted specifically against each genus identified 11 patients with Balamuthia infection, four with N. fowleri, and three with Acanthamoeba. Immunohistochemical assays highlighted the presence of trophozoites that were difficult to identify with hematoxylin and eosin stains in areas of necrosis or where macrophages were abundant. Immunohistochemical assays also demonstrated the presence of granular antigens inside macrophages and blood vessel walls. Amebic cysts were observed in three patients with Acanthamoeba infection and in three with Balamuthia. Patients with Acanthamoeba infection showed granulomatous inflammation. Patients with Naegleria infection had neutrophilic inflammation. Balamuthia infections showed a spectrum of inflammation that ranged from primarily neutrophils to granulomas. Meningitis was present in 88% of cases. Immunohistochemical assays were useful to demonstrate the presence of granular antigens and confirmed the genus of the ameba. The spectrum of inflammation in cases of Balamuthia meningoencephalitis is broader than previously described. The term amebic meningoencephalitis describes better the histopathologic findings than the currently used classification of primary amebic meningoencephalitis and granulomatous amebic encephalitis.

Download full-text

Full-text

Available from: Govinda Visvesvara, Feb 06, 2015
0 Followers
 · 
101 Views
  • Source
    Non-Flavivirus Encephalitis, 11/2011; , ISBN: 978-953-307-720-8
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Il a été bien documenté que les différentes canalisations des unités de soins dentaires contiennent un épais biofilm. Ce biofilm est constitué entre autres de bactéries, mais aussi d’amibes. Certaines amibes ont un potentiel pathogène et peuvent causer des infections graves. Deux cas d’infections amibiennes et possiblement reliées aux unités dentaires ont retenu notre attention et sont à l’origine du présent projet. L’identification morphologique des amibes afin de déterminer si elles présentent un potentiel pathogène ou non est une tâche ardue, même pour les protozoologistes chevronnés. Nous avons donc utilisé la réaction de polymérase en chaîne (PCR) pour identifier les amibes. Des nouvelles amorces ont été élaborées pour détecter les amibes des genres Acanthamoeba ainsi que Naegleria. Des échantillons d’eau et de terre ont été prélevés dans l’environnement, et des échantillons d’eau et de biofilm ont été prélevés dans les unités dentaires. Une partie de chaque échantillon a été mise en culture selon une méthode améliorée pour une identification morphologique, et l’autre partie a été soumise à un PCR direct. Des Acanthamoebae et/ou des Naegleriae ont été détectées dans 100% des échantillons, mais les espèces varient d’un échantillon à l’autre. Des amibes à potentiel pathogènes sont détectables dans les unités dentaires ainsi que dans l’environnement, et celles-ci pourraient représenter un risque pour la santé de certains individus. It has been well documented that the various tubing of a dental unit are covered with a thick biofilm. This biofilm mostly consists of bacteria, but amoebae can be found within the biofilm as well. Some amoebae are potential pathogens and may cause serious infections. Two cases of amoebic infections that were possibly linked with dental units drew our attention and stimulated our researches. Morphologic identification of amoebae in order to determine their possible pathogenicity requires much expertise, and is even difficult for proficient protozoologists. Therefore, the use of PCR is essential to detect potentially pathogenic amoebae with subjectivity. We elaborated new primers for the detection of Acanthamoeba spp. and Naegleria spp. Samples of water and dirt were taken in the environment, and samples of water and biofilm were taken in dental units. A part of each samples was cultivated for morphological identification, when a second part was utilized for PCR identification. Acanthamoebae and/or Naegleriae were detected in 100% of our samples, but the species varied from one sample to another. Potentially pathogenic amoebae were detected in dental units and in the environment, which could represent a health risk for some individuals.
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Meningoencephalitis caused by Acanthamoeba spp . is a rare opportunistic infection, difficult to diagnose and difficult to treat, which causes death in almost all cases. We report the neuropathologic findings of a 16-year-old girl with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) treated with immunosuppression who died of fulminant Acanthamoeba meningoencephalitis. Neuropathologic examination revealed multiple supratentorial and infratentorial hemorrhagic necrotizing lesions with encephalitis and vasculitis with mixed inflammatory infiltrates, fibrinoid necrosis of vessel walls, and local leptomeningitis. Acanthamoeba in the lesions may be misinterpreted as macrophages. Taking them into differential diagnostic consideration, cytological differences should be detected, and relevant additional stains for reliable differentiation of these cells can be performed. To our knowledge, this is the first published case of Acanthamoeba meningoencephalitis in a patient with SLE in Germany.
    Der Pathologe 10/2008; 29(6):442-8. · 0.64 Impact Factor