Article

Melanocytic Nevi and sun exposure in a cohort of Colorado children: Anatomic distribution and site-specific sunburn

Department of Pediatrics, University of Colorado, Denver, Colorado, United States
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention (Impact Factor: 4.32). 10/2007; 16(10):2136-43. DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-07-0453
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Sun exposure and high prevalence of melanocytic nevi are major risk factors for melanoma, but the relationship between them is not well understood. This study examines the relationship between sun exposure (detailed by anatomic location and history of site-specific sunburns) and the presence of melanocytic nevi on 743 White children in Denver, Colorado. Parental reports of site-specific sunburns were collected annually for 2 years starting at ages 5 to 6 years. In the third year, nevi were counted and mapped by anatomic location. Nevus density was higher for boys (36.0 nevi/m2) than for girls (31.0 nevi/m2; P = 0.04). Nevus density was highest on the face, neck, and lateral forearms and was significantly higher in chronically versus intermittently sun-exposed areas (P < 0.0001). Compared with girls, boys had higher nevus density on the face, neck, and trunk, and lower nevus density on the upper arms and thighs (P < 0.01). In 2 years of reports, most subjects (69%) received at least one sunburn. The face, shoulders, and back were the most frequently sunburned areas of the body. When adjusted for host factors, total number of sunburns was significantly associated with higher total nevus prevalence (P = 0.01 for one burn). Site-specific sunburns were significantly associated with nevus prevalence on the back (P = 0.03 for three or more sunburns), but not on the face, arms, or legs. In this high-risk population, there is evidence for two pathways to nevus accumulation: by chronic sun exposure and by intermittent exposure related to sunburns.

Download full-text

Full-text

Available from: Nancy Asdigian, Jul 05, 2014
0 Followers
 · 
92 Views
  • Source
    • "It is possible that intense and repeated sunlight exposure in childhood may increase the number of small naevi as total naevus counts are higher in Australia compared to the UK but it is likely that small lentigines are also miscounted as naevi on sun exposed sites [6]. Males also show consistently higher number of naevi than females and this is also seen in different parts of the world irrespective of sun exposure [8] [9]. The types of naevi also vary greatly according to body sites as intradermal naevi which are mature lesions with a low risk of transformation into melanoma are common on the face for example but are more rarely seen on the limbs for examples. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: There are many observations regarding the behaviour of melanoma which points away from sunshine as the main cause of this tumour. Incidence data shows that the increase is mostly seen for thin melanomas which cannot be attributed to sun exposure but increasing screening over the last 20years. Melanoma behaves in a similar fashion all over the world regarding age of onset, gender differences and histological subtypes. An excess of naevi is the strongest risk factor for melanoma and their appearance and involution throughout life, and the differences in naevus distribution according to gender is giving us a lot of clues about melanoma biology. Melanoma like all cancers is a complex disease with the involvement of many common and low penetrance genes many of them involved in pigmentation and naevogenesis but these only explain a very small portion of melanoma susceptibility. Genes involved in melanocyte differentiation early on in embryogenesis are also becoming relevant for melanoma initiation and progression. Reduced senescence and longevity as well as body weight and energy expenditure are also relevant for melanoma susceptibility. These observations with links between melanoma and non-sun related phenotypes as well as gene discoveries should help to assess the relative contribution of genetic and environmental factors in its causation.
    Medical Hypotheses 06/2013; 81(5). DOI:10.1016/j.mehy.2013.05.031 · 1.07 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "Parents were asked how often their child engages in 4 sun-protective habits while outdoors on sunny days during the summer between 11 am and 3 pm: wearing clothes that cover most of the arms and legs, staying in the shade, wearing a hat, and wearing sunscreen or sunblock (11,12). Responses were recorded with a 5-point scale ranging from 1 (never) to 5 (all the time) (11,12). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Sun exposure is a major risk factor for skin cancer, but without physical activity, children are at risk of childhood obesity. The objective of this study was to explore relationships between parental perceptions of skin cancer threat, sun protection behaviors, physical activity, and body mass index (BMI) in children. This is a cross-sectional analysis nested within the Colorado Kids Sun Care Program sun safety intervention trial. In summer 2007, parent telephone interviews provided data on demographics, perceptions of skin cancer threat, sun protection behaviors, and physical activity. Physical examinations provided data on phenotype, freckling, and BMI. Data from 999 Colorado children born in 1998 were included in analysis. We used analysis of variance, Spearman's rho (ρ) correlation, and multivariable linear regression analysis to evaluate relationships with total amount of outdoor physical activity. After controlling for sex, race/ethnicity, skin color, and sun protection, regression analysis showed that each unit increase in perceived severity of nonmelanoma skin cancer was associated with a 30% increase in hours of outdoor physical activity (P = .005). Hours of outdoor physical activity were not related to perceived severity of melanoma or perceived susceptibility to skin cancer. BMI-for-age was not significantly correlated with perceptions of skin cancer threat, use of sun protection, or level of physical activity. The promotion of sun safety is not likely to inhibit physical activity. Skin cancer prevention programs should continue to promote midday sun avoidance and sun protection during outdoor activities.
    Preventing chronic disease 08/2012; 9:E143. DOI:10.5888/pcd9.110345 · 1.96 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "Naevus density was highest on the face, neck and lateral forearms and total number of sunburns was associated with total naevus prevalence. Site-specific sunburns were significantly associated with naevus prevalence on the back (P = 0.03 for three or more sunburns) but not on the face, arms or legs (Dodd et al., 2007). Non-Hispanic white boys had significantly more naevi than did girls from 6 years of age, and this difference was due to more small naevi and naevi on chronically exposed body sites (Crane et al., 2009). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: We review the general amount and patterns of exposure to solar ultraviolet (UV) radiation that children and teenagers experience and the spectrum of UV-related skin damage that can occur as a result. Data about the amount of solar UV received by children and teenagers are relatively few but suggest that around 40-50% of total UV to age 60 occurs before age 20. Among white children, those with the palest complexions suffer the most damage. Comparisons of prevalence and incidence of outcomes in children and teenagers sharing common ancestry, but living at different latitudes, show that prevalence rates of photoaging and melanocytic naevi are higher in Australian compared with British children, and similarly for melanoma. Genetic risk for the majority of the melanomas in teens is a function of genes controlling naevus propensity and pigmentation in the skin. High numbers of naevi and freckles, red hair, blue eyes, inability to tan, as well as a family history are the primary determinants of melanoma among adolescents. Beyond the signs of skin damage seen in children are the latent effects observed later in adulthood. Childhood is believed to be a susceptible window for long-term harmful effects of UV, as evidenced by clear differences in skin cancer risk between child and adult migrants from high to low latitudes. Effective UV radiation protection from childhood is necessary to control both immediate and long-term harmful effects on children's skin.
    Progress in Biophysics and Molecular Biology 09/2011; 107(3):349-55. DOI:10.1016/j.pbiomolbio.2011.08.010 · 3.38 Impact Factor
Show more