Article

EST sequencing of Onychophora and phylogenomic analysis of Metazoa

Institute of Zoology and Zoological Museum, University of Hamburg, D-20146 Hamburg, Germany.
Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution (Impact Factor: 4.02). 01/2008; 45(3):942-51. DOI: 10.1016/j.ympev.2007.09.002
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Onychophora (velvet worms) represent a small animal taxon considered to be related to Euarthropoda. We have obtained 1873 5' cDNA sequences (expressed sequence tags, ESTs) from the velvet worm Epiperipatus sp., which were assembled into 833 contigs. BLAST similarity searches revealed that 51.9% of the contigs had matches in the protein databases with expectation values lower than 10(-4). Most ESTs had the best hit with proteins from either Chordata or Arthropoda (approximately 40% respectively). The ESTs included sequences of 27 ribosomal proteins. The orthologous sequences from 28 other species of a broad range of phyla were obtained from the databases, including other EST projects. A concatenated amino acid alignment comprising 5021 positions was constructed, which covers 4259 positions when problematic regions were removed. Bayesian and maximum likelihood methods place Epiperipatus within the monophyletic Ecdysozoa (Onychophora, Arthropoda, Tardigrada and Nematoda), but its exact relation to the Euarthropoda remained unresolved. The "Articulata" concept was not supported. Tardigrada and Nematoda formed a well-supported monophylum, suggesting that Tardigrada are actually Cycloneuralia. In agreement with previous studies, we have demonstrated that random sequencing of cDNAs results in sequence information suitable for phylogenomic approaches to resolve metazoan relationships.

Download full-text

Full-text

Available from: Hilke Ruhberg, Jun 12, 2015
2 Followers
 · 
122 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: A review of more than hundred papers on the bilaterian phylogeny presenting the results of studies conducted in the last twenty years is analyzed. The review discusses the most significant results that were obtained using different materials (genes, proteins, and so on) and processed by different statistic models. A comparison of these results is possible with due regard for a special methodological approach; it is not considered in this paper. The review presents hypotheses developed in different time periods; it allows realizing how concepts of phylogeny of some animal groups change with time. This paper includes the data on the phylogeny of all bilaterian phyla belonging to three main stems (Lophotrochozoa, Ecdysozoa, and Deuterostomia). In addition, the data on the groups, the position of which on the bilaterian phylogenetic tree is still uncertain, are also presented. The review contains a list of references, which includes not only the works with summary results on phylogeny of Bilateria or some large groups, but also on phylogeny of taxa of the species rank.
    Zoologicheskiĭ zhurnal 03/2014; 93(3):318-341. DOI:10.7868/S0044513414030155 · 0.19 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The kingdom of fungi provides model organisms for biotechnology, cell biology, genetics, and life sciences in general. Only when their phylogenetic relationships are stably resolved, can individual results from fungal research be integrated into a holistic picture of biology. However, and despite recent progress, many deep relationships within the fungi remain unclear. Here, we present the first phylogenomic study of an entire eukaryotic kingdom that uses a consistency criterion to strengthen phylogenetic conclusions. We reason that branches (splits) recovered with independent data and different tree reconstruction methods are likely to reflect true evolutionary relationships. Two complementary phylogenomic data sets based on 99 fungal genomes and 109 fungal expressed sequence tag (EST) sets analyzed with four different tree reconstruction methods shed light from different angles on the fungal tree of life. Eleven additional data sets address specifically the phylogenetic position of Blastocladiomycota, Ustilaginomycotina, and Dothideomycetes, respectively. The combined evidence from the resulting trees supports the deep-level stability of the fungal groups toward a comprehensive natural system of the fungi. In addition, our analysis reveals methodologically interesting aspects. Enrichment for EST encoded data-a common practice in phylogenomic analyses-introduces a strong bias toward slowly evolving and functionally correlated genes. Consequently, the generalization of phylogenomic data sets as collections of randomly selected genes cannot be taken for granted. A thorough characterization of the data to assess possible influences on the tree reconstruction should therefore become a standard in phylogenomic analyses.
    Molecular Biology and Evolution 11/2011; 29(5):1319-34. DOI:10.1093/molbev/msr285 · 14.31 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Metazoa comprises 35–40 phyla that include some 1.3 million described species. Phylogenetic analyses of metazoan interrelationships have progressed in the past two decades from those based on morphology and/or targeted-gene approaches using single and then multiple loci to the more recent phylogenomic approaches that use hundreds or thousands of genes from genome and transcriptome sequencing projects. A stable core of the tree for bilaterian animals is now at hand, and instability and conflict are becoming restricted to a key set of important but contentious relationships. Acoelomorph flatworms (Acoela + Nemertodermatida) and Xenoturbella are sister groups. The position of this clade remains controversial, with different analyses supporting either a sister-group relation to other bilaterians (=Nephrozoa, composed of Protostomia and Deuterostomia) or membership in Deuterostomia. The main clades of deuterostomes (Ambulacraria and Chordata) and protostomes (Ecdysozoa and Spiralia) are recovered in numerous analyses based on varied molecular samples, and also receive anatomical and developmental support. Outstanding issues in protostome phylogenetics are the position of Chaetognatha within the protostome clade, and the monophyly of a group of spiralians collectively named Platyzoa. In contrast to the broad consensus over key questions in bilaterian phylogeny, the relationships of the five main metazoan lineages—Porifera, Ctenophora, Placozoa, Cnidaria and Bilateria—remain subject to conflicting topologies according to different taxonomic samples and analytical approaches. Whether deep bilaterian divergences such as the split between protostome and deuterostome clades date to the Cryogenian or Ediacaran (and, thus, the extent to which the pre-Cambrian fossil record is incomplete) is sensitive to dating methodology. KeywordsPhylogenomics–Expressed sequence tags–Animal evolution–Bilateria–Ecdysozoa–Spiralia
    Organisms Diversity & Evolution 06/2011; 11(2):151-172. DOI:10.1007/s13127-011-0044-4 · 3.37 Impact Factor