Article

Development and pilot evaluation of novel genetic educational materials designed for an underserved patient population.

University of California, Berkeley-University of California, San Francisco Joint Medical Program, USA.
Genetic Testing (Impact Factor: 1.65). 02/2007; 11(3):276-90. DOI: 10.1089/gte.2007.0012
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Genetic counseling for BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations involves teaching about hereditary cancer, genetics and risk, subjects that are difficult to grasp and are routinely misunderstood. Supported by a grant from the Avon Foundation, the UCSF Cancer Risk Program started the first genetic testing and counseling service for a population of traditionally underserved women of varied ethnic and social backgrounds at the San Francisco General Hospital (SFGH). Informed by educational theory and clinical experience, we devised and piloted two simplified explanations of heredity and genetic risk, with the aim of uncovering how to best communicate genetics and risk to this underserved population. A "conventional" version comprised pictures of genes, pedigrees, and quantitative representations of risk. A "colloquial" pictorial version used an analogy of the "information book" of genes, family stories and vignettes, and visual representations of risk, without using scientific words such as genes or chromosomes. A verbal narrative accompanied each picture. We presented these modules to four focus groups of five to eight women recruited from the SFGH Family Practice Clinic. Overall, women preferred a picture-based approach and commented that additional text would have been distracting. The majority of women preferred the colloquial version because it was easier to understand and better conveyed a sense of comfort and hope. We conclude that simplicity, analogies, and familiarity support comprehension while vignettes, family stories, and photos of real people provide comfort and hope. These elements may promote understanding of complex scientific topics in healthcare, particularly when communicating with patients who come from disadvantaged backgrounds.

0 Followers
 · 
67 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Usually, the mass media do not address hereditary cancer and their risk factors, nor are these topics discussed at the community level. We used an informative guide on cancer and hereditary cancer, followed by a questionnaire on these topics to investigate the relevant knowledge among women at high risk for hereditary breast and/or colorectal cancer from a population-based cohort. The cohort was composed of 81 Brazilian women with positive family histories of breast and/or colorectal cancer. Strauss and Corbin's Grounded Theory was used for qualitative analysis. The average age of the cohort was 49.9 years old. Three participants (3.9 %) were illiterate, 45 (59.2 %) had attended elementary school, 14 (18.4 %) had secondary school, and 14 (18.4 %) held higher education degrees. A total of 47 (54.3 %) volunteers were unable to fully understand the information provided in the guide because they did not know the meaning of words such as metastasis, malignant, hereditary, sporadic, or oncogenetics. Notwithstanding, the acceptance of the educational tool utilized was satisfactory, and it enhanced the volunteers' interest in a better understanding of cancer and heredity. Thereby, we concluded that the low knowledge of this important subject and the unawareness about fundamental terms required for the comprehension of this specific type of neoplasm made us believe that the use of the informative guide can provide a great value when used previously to the genetic counseling consultations. Besides, educational tools of easy understanding should be part of everyday clinical practice, from primary to specialized patient care.
    Journal of Cancer Education 05/2014; 30(1). DOI:10.1007/s13187-014-0663-5 · 1.05 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This article presents two case studies in the development of BRCA genetic medicine in relation to specific ‘populations’ in the United Kingdom and United States, juxtaposing an ‘over researched Ashkenazi Jewish population’ in the United Kingdom and ‘medically underserved populations’ in the United States. Each case explores the research and clinical practices, as well as social, cultural and biological histories, through which population and genetics are co-produced (Jasanoff, 2004). In the first case study, ethnographic and qualitative data in the United Kingdom highlight the ways in which genetic medicine, research and disease can become intertwined with specific aspects of Jewish culture and history, and the effect this has on how this population responds to, and takes up, genetic testing and screening programmes. The second case study describes the intersection of genetic medicine in the form of BRCA clinical practices for ‘medically underserved populations’ with the discourses and practices of health disparities in the United States, and discusses the effects of this intersection on practices of BRCA genetic medicine and research. The juxtaposition of the two cases sheds new light on some of the specific cultural and biological practices that produce and define populations in local contexts, highlighting the contrasting ways in which BRCA genetic medicine is developing in relation to population.
    BioSocieties 12/2010; 5(4). DOI:10.1057/biosoc.2010.27 · 1.26 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: We describe the development of a psychoeducational intervention (PEI) to increase uptake of genetic counseling targeted to high-risk breast cancer survivors. Based on previous research, scientific literature, and a review of cancer education websites, we identified potential PEI content. We then assessed the initial acceptability and preference of two booklets of identical content but different layouts, by presenting the booklets to individuals with a personal or family history of breast cancer (n = 57). The preferred booklet was evaluated by two focus groups of ten breast cancer patients who had not attended genetic counseling. The booklet was refined based on participants' feedback at each stage. Focus group participants generally found the booklet visually appealing, informative, and helpful, but some thought that it was too long. Final changes were made based on learner verification principles of attraction, comprehension, cultural acceptability, and persuasion. This project produced an interventional tool to present key constructs that may facilitate decision making about risk-appropriate genetic counseling uptake among high-risk breast cancer survivors. The process described for creating, testing, and adapting materials from a patient perspective can be used for developing other PEIs. This newly developed, unique PEI can be used in many clinical settings.
    Journal of Cancer Education 04/2014; 29(4). DOI:10.1007/s13187-014-0643-9 · 1.05 Impact Factor