Article

Variation in HIV-1 set-point viral load: epidemiological analysis and an evolutionary hypothesis.

Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London W2 1PG, United Kingdom.
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (Impact Factor: 9.81). 11/2007; 104(44):17441-6. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0708559104
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The natural course of HIV-1 infection is characterized by a high degree of heterogeneity in viral load, not just within patients over time, but also between patients, especially during the asymptomatic stage of infection. Asymptomatic, or set-point, viral load has been shown to correlate with both decreased time to AIDS and increased infectiousness. The aim of this study is to characterize the epidemiological impact of heterogeneity in set-point viral load. By analyzing two cohorts of untreated patients, we quantify the relationships between both viral load and infectiousness and the duration of the asymptomatic infectious period. We find that, because both the duration of infection and infectiousness determine the opportunities for the virus to be transmitted, this suggests a trade-off between these contributions to the overall transmission potential. Some public health implications of variation in set-point viral load are discussed. We observe that set-point viral loads are clustered around those that maximize the transmission potential, and this leads us to hypothesize that HIV-1 could have evolved to optimize its transmissibility, a form of adaptation to the human host population. We discuss how this evolutionary hypothesis can be tested, review the evidence available to date, and highlight directions for future research.

Full-text

Available from: T. Deirdre Hollingsworth, Jun 12, 2015
0 Followers
 · 
136 Views
  • Source
    Frontiers in Microbiology 04/2015; 6:355. DOI:10.3389/fmicb.2015.00355 · 3.94 Impact Factor
  • Cartilage 12/2013; 5(1):28-36. DOI:10.1177/1947603513509650
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Long-distance animal migrations have important consequences for infectious disease dynamics. In some cases, migration lowers pathogen transmission by removing infected individuals during strenuous journeys and allowing ani- mals to periodically escape contaminated habitats. Human activities are now causing some migratory animals to travel shorter distances or form sedentary (non-migratory) populations. We focused on North American mon- arch butterflies and a specialist protozoan parasite to investigate how the loss of migratory behaviours affects pathogen spread and evolution. Each autumn, monarchs migrate from breeding grounds in the eastern US and Canada to wintering sites in central Mexico. However, some monarchs have become non-migratory and breed year-round on exotic milkweed in the southern US. We used field sampling, citizen science data and experimental inocu- lations to quantify infection prevalence and parasite virulence among migratory and sedentary populations. Infection prevalence was markedly higher among sedentary monarchs compared with migratory monarchs, indi- cating that diminished migration increases infection risk. Virulence differed among parasite strains but was similar between migratory and sedentary populations, potentially owing to high gene flow or insufficient time for evol- utionary divergence. More broadly, our findings suggest that human activities that alter animal migrations can influence pathogen dynamics, with implications for wildlife conservation and future disease risks.
    Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 01/2015; 282(1801):20141734. DOI:10.1098/rspb.2014.1734 · 5.29 Impact Factor