Engineered bidirectional communication mediates a consensus in a microbial biofilm consortium

Division of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, California Institute of Technology, MC 210-41, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA.
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (Impact Factor: 9.67). 11/2007; 104(44):17300-4. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0704256104
Source: PubMed


Microbial consortia form when multiple species colocalize and communally generate a function that none is capable of alone. Consortia abound in nature, and their cooperative metabolic activities influence everything from biodiversity in the global food chain to human weight gain. Here, we present an engineered consortium in which the microbial members communicate with each other and exhibit a "consensus" gene expression response. Two colocalized populations of Escherichia coli converse bidirectionally by exchanging acyl-homoserine lactone signals. The consortium generates the gene-expression response if and only if both populations are present at sufficient cell densities. Because neither population can respond without the other's signal, this consensus function can be considered a logical AND gate in which the inputs are cell populations. The microbial consensus consortium operates in diverse growth modes, including in a biofilm, where it sustains its response for several days.

Download full-text


Available from: Frances H Arnold,
  • Source
    • " with constant connectivity through resources flow ( example from Kim et al . , 2008 ) . on the local partners during colony growth into available space drives assortment and automatically grants cooperators instead of cheaters more access to cooperative partners , thus disfavoring cheaters and ensuring partner fidelity ( Momeni et al . , 2013 ) . Brenner et al . ( 2007 ) similarly engineered a microbial consor - tium , but with more limited stability . The system involved positive feedbacks , in this case producing a fluorescence compound with a consensus quorum sensing ( QS ) control mechanism , and tested the cultures in liquid and solid phase ( mass - action and spatially structured ) ( Figure 3B )"
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The metabolic capabilities of microbes are the basis for many major biotechnological advances, exploiting microbial diversity by selection or engineering of single strains. However, there are limits to the advances that can be achieved with single strains, and attention has turned toward the metabolic potential of consortia and the field of synthetic ecology. The main challenge for the synthetic ecology is that consortia are frequently unstable, largely because evolution by constituent members affects their interactions, which are the basis of collective metabolic functionality. Current practices in modeling consortia largely consider interactions as fixed circuits of chemical reactions, which greatly increases their tractability. This simplification comes at the cost of essential biological realism, stripping out the ecological context in which the metabolic actions occur and the potential for evolutionary change. In other words, evolutionary stability is not engineered into the system. This realization highlights the necessity to better identify the key components that influence the stable coexistence of microorganisms. Inclusion of ecological and evolutionary principles, in addition to biophysical variables and stoichiometric modeling of metabolism, is critical for microbial consortia design. This review aims to bring ecological and evolutionary concepts to the discussion on the stability of microbial consortia. In particular, we focus on the combined effect of spatial structure (connectivity of molecules and cells within the system) and ecological interactions (reciprocal and non-reciprocal) on the persistence of microbial consortia. We discuss exemplary cases to illustrate these ideas from published studies in evolutionary biology and biotechnology. We conclude by making clear the relevance of incorporating evolutionary and ecological principles to the design of microbial consortia, as a way of achieving evolutionarily stable and sustainable systems.
    Frontiers in Microbiology 03/2015; 6. DOI:10.3389/fmicb.2015.00143 · 3.99 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "With well-defined and characterized biological properties, several QS regulators and corresponding autoinducers have also been used for synthetic gene networks. For example, LuxR/LuxI and/or LasR/LasI pairs were used to generate programmed patterns (Basu et al., 2005; Payne et al., 2013), trigger biofilm formation (Hong et al., 2012; Kobayashi et al., 2004), develop synthetic ecosystems and program population dynamics (Balagaddé et al., 2008; Brenner et al., 2007), and construct synchronized oscillators (Danino et al., 2010; Prindle et al., 2012), edge detectors (Tabor et al., 2009), and pulse generators (Basu et al., 2004). RhlR/RhlI has also been used in the study of generic mechanisms of natural selection (Chuang et al., 2009) as well as for carrying out biological computations as chemical ''wires'' (Tamsir et al., 2011). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Widespread quorum-sensing (QS) enables bacteria to communicate and plays a critical role in controlling bacterial virulence. However, effects of promiscuous QS crosstalk and its implications for gene regulation and cell decision-making remain largely unknown. Here we systematically studied the crosstalk between LuxR/I and LasR/I systems and found that QS crosstalk can be dissected into signal crosstalk and promoter crosstalk. Further investigations using synthetic positive feedback circuits revealed that signal crosstalk significantly decreases a circuit's bistable potential while maintaining unimodality. Promoter crosstalk, however, reproducibly generates complex trimodal responses resulting from noise-induced state transitions and host-circuit interactions. A mathematical model that integrates the circuit's nonlinearity, stochasticity, and host-circuit interactions was developed, and its predictions of conditions for trimodality were verified experimentally. Combining synthetic biology and mathematical modeling, this work sheds light on the complex behaviors emerging from QS crosstalk, which could be exploited for therapeutics and biotechnology. Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
    Chemistry & Biology 11/2014; 21(12). DOI:10.1016/j.chembiol.2014.10.008 · 6.65 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "Gene transfer potential—The toggle switch is carried on a low copy number plasmid (pBR322 ColE1 replication origin, 15–20 copies per cell). JM2.300 is an F-strain (Brenner et al., 2007). It is capable of receiving F plasmids through conjugation, and is not capable of transmitting plasmids to other microbes. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Synthetic Biology promises low-cost, exponentially scalable products and global health solutions in the form of self-replicating organisms, or "living devices." As these promises are realized, proof-of-concept systems will gradually migrate from tightly regulated laboratory or industrial environments into private spaces as, for instance, probiotic health products, food, and even do-it-yourself bioengineered systems. What additional steps, if any, should be taken before releasing engineered self-replicating organisms into a broader user space? In this review, we explain how studies of genetically modified organisms lay groundwork for the future landscape of biosafety. Early in the design process, biological engineers are anticipating potential hazards and developing innovative tools to mitigate risk. Here, we survey lessons learned, ongoing efforts to engineer intrinsic biocontainment, and how different stakeholders in synthetic biology can act to accomplish best practices for biosafety.
    Frontiers in Microbiology 01/2013; 4:5. DOI:10.3389/fmicb.2013.00005 · 3.99 Impact Factor
Show more