The Surgical Hospitalist: A New Model for Emergency Surgical Care

Department of Surgery, University of California-San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94103, USA.
Journal of the American College of Surgeons (Impact Factor: 5.12). 11/2007; 205(5):704-11. DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2007.05.008
Source: PubMed


Quality of acute surgical care in the US is threatened by a shortage of surgeons performing emergency procedures because of rising costs of uncompensated care, liability concerns, declining reimbursement, and lifestyle considerations. In July 2005, we restructured the general surgery service at our medical center into a hospitalist model to improve patient access to surgical care.
We hypothesized that a surgical hospitalist program could improve timeliness of care, emergency department (ED) efficiency and physician satisfaction, resident supervision, continuity of care, and revenue generation. We reviewed our program after 1 year, including patient demographics, diagnosis, and time to consult.
Three surgical hospitalists cared for 853 patients during 1 year. Patients ranged from 17 to 100 years of age and presented with abdominal pain (66%), infection (18%), malignancy (6%), hernia (4%), and trauma (3%). Fifty-seven percent of consults originated from the ED; 8% came from other surgeons. Mean time to consult was 20 minutes. A survey of ED physicians reported shorter ED length of stay, better patient satisfaction, improved professionalism and resident supervision, and better overall quality of care. Average waiting time for patients with acute appendicitis to undergo operation was reduced from 16 +/- 10 hours to 8 +/- 4 hours (p < 0.05). Forty-two percent of consults resulted in an operative procedure, and revenue increased as the number of billable consults rose by 190%.
The surgical hospitalist model provides a cost-effective way for general surgeons to provide timely and high-quality emergency surgical care and enhance patient and referring provider satisfaction.

Download full-text


Available from: Hobart W Harris, Jul 27, 2014
146 Reads
  • Source
    • "Hospitalists may also improve the timeliness of emergency surgical care. In three studies where admission and preoperative assessments were conducted by hospitalists as opposed to a member of the surgical team, mean time to surgery was reduced by 35% to 50% [62,81,82]. Along with improvements in efficiency prior to surgery, overall lengths of stay for surgical patients comanaged by hospitalists were reduced in all studies [48,77,82-84], although none demonstrated associated reductions in costs [48,77]. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Despite more than a decade of research on hospitalists and their performance, disagreement still exists regarding whether and how hospital-based physicians improve the quality of inpatient care delivery. This systematic review summarizes the findings from 65 comparative evaluations to determine whether hospitalists provide a higher quality of inpatient care relative to traditional inpatient physicians who maintain hospital privileges with concurrent outpatient practices. Articles on hospitalist performance published between January 1996 and December 2010 were identified through MEDLINE, Embase, Science Citation Index, CINAHL, NHS Economic Evaluation Database and a hand-search of reference lists, key journals and editorials. Comparative evaluations presenting original, quantitative data on processes, efficiency or clinical outcome measures of care between hospitalists, community-based physicians and traditional academic attending physicians were included (n = 65). After proposing a conceptual framework for evaluating inpatient physician performance, major findings on quality are summarized according to their percentage change, direction and statistical significance. The majority of reviewed articles demonstrated that hospitalists are efficient providers of inpatient care on the basis of reductions in their patients' average length of stay (69%) and total hospital costs (70%); however, the clinical quality of hospitalist care appears to be comparable to that provided by their colleagues. The methodological quality of hospitalist evaluations remains a concern and has not improved over time. Persistent issues include insufficient reporting of source or sample populations (n = 30), patients lost to follow-up (n = 42) and estimates of effect or random variability (n = 35); inappropriate use of statistical tests (n = 55); and failure to adjust for established confounders (n = 37). Future research should include an expanded focus on the specific structures of care that differentiate hospitalists from other inpatient physician groups as well as the development of better conceptual and statistical models that identify and measure underlying mechanisms driving provider-outcome associations in quality.
    BMC Medicine 05/2011; 9(1):58. DOI:10.1186/1741-7015-9-58 · 7.25 Impact Factor
  • Source

  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: A network/database server is presented in this paper. The PC serves as the data acquisition controller of a polled multidrop network that retrieves information from input terminals. The PC server simultaneously receives data from any combination of terminals on the network. It then updates a local SQL database, prompts the operator at the terminal for the next bit of information, while allowing access to the database from users connected to the server via a local area network. This system was developed to replace an out dated inventory tracking and control process which is currently in use by a local manufacturing company. The system presented will provide greater efficiency and productivity to the company by allowing its employees access to an inventory database that is updated in real-time. The use of a multitasking operating system and modern networking methods are the tools that will provide the company with the ability to keep its employees on top of inventory issues. This paper illustrates the practicality and benefits of taking advantage of the multitasking, networking, and processing capabilities of modern computers and operating systems
    Intelligent Control, 1997. Proceedings of the 1997 IEEE International Symposium on; 08/1997
Show more