Rural vs urban colorectal and lung cancer patients: Differences in stage at presentation

Department of Surgery, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH 03756, USA.
Journal of the American College of Surgeons (Impact Factor: 4.45). 11/2007; 205(5):636-41. DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2007.04.043
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Rural surgeons are often uneasy when their outcomes are compared with those of urban surgeons because they perceive that rural patients typically present with worse disease. Rural patients with cancer are commonly thought to present at a later stage of disease, although this is based largely on anecdotal evidence.
Retrospective, descriptive analysis of cancer stage at presentation of rural versus urban patients with two common cancers (lung, colorectal) using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database from the National Cancer Institute. Rural versus urban designations were based on rural-urban continuum codes from the US Department of Agriculture. We constructed an ordinal logistic regression model to compare stage at presentation between rural and urban colorectal and lung cancer patients, while controlling for other factors that might be associated with late stage at presentation, including age, race, gender, marital status, income level, and level of education.
In univariate and multivariate analyses, patients with colorectal and lung cancer from rural areas were not more likely to present at later stage. The ordinal logistic regression model indicated that urban patients are more likely to present with late-stage colorectal and lung cancer, compared with rural patients (p < 0.001). For colon cancer, other factors notably associated with stage IV disease were low-income, African-American race, age younger than 65 years, divorce, male gender, and language isolation. For lung cancer, factors notably associated with stage IV disease were African-American race, divorce, male gender, and language isolation.
Urban rather than rural residence appears to be associated with later stages of lung and colorectal cancer at presentation. This finding is contrary to the common assumption that rural patients present at later stages of disease.

  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: IGBT PWM inverter has been concerned that insulation breakdown and irregular voltage distribution on stator winding due to high rate of voltage rise (dv/dt) caused by high-frequency switching and impedance mismatch between inverter and motor. In this paper, voltage distribution in stator windings of induction motor driven by IGBT PWM inverter is studied. To analyze the irregular voltage of stator winding, high frequency parameter is computed by using finite element method (FEM). An equivalent circuit composed by distributed capacitances, inductance, and resistance is derived from these parameters. This equivalent circuit is then used for simulation in order to predict the voltage distribution among the turns and coils. The variable effect on rising time of the inverter and cable length on the voltage distribution is also presented. In order to experiment, an induction motor, 50 [HP], with taps from one phase and a switching surge generator were built to consider the voltage distribution.
    Electrical Machines and Systems, 2003. ICEMS 2003. Sixth International Conference on; 12/2003
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Early conception of G-protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) and receptor tyrosine kinase (RTK) signaling pathways was that each represented distinct and linear modules that converged on downstream targets, such as p42/p44 mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK). It has now become clear that this is not the case and that multiple levels of cross-talk exist between both receptor systems at early points during signaling events. In recent years, it has become apparent that transactivation of receptor tyrosine kinases by GPCR agonists is a general phenomenon that has been demonstrated for many unrelated GPCRs and receptor tyrosine kinases. In this case, GPCR/G-protein participation is upstream of the receptor tyrosine kinase. However, evidence now demonstrates that numerous growth factors use G proteins and associated signaling molecules such as beta-arrestins that participate downstream of the receptor tyrosine kinase to signal to effectors, such as p42/p44 MAPK. This article highlights experimental approaches used to investigate this novel mechanism of cross-talk between receptor tyrosine kinases and GPCRs.
    Methods in Enzymology 02/2004; 390:451-75. DOI:10.1016/S0076-6879(04)90028-6 · 2.19 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Fewer than half of Americans have been screened for colorectal cancer (CRC), a largely preventable disease. All physician members (n = 1030) of the Iowa Academy of Family Physicians were mailed a 3-page investigator-developed survey about their attitudes, barriers, and practices regarding CRC screening. The usable response rate was 29%. Forty-three percent practiced in rural settings. Ninety-five percent felt that they were well informed about American Cancer Society guidelines and 90% tried to follow the guidelines. Most doctors (88%) disagreed with the statement that there was "no time to adequately discuss screening," but they would like more time to discuss screening. Only 40% felt their medical records were organized to easily determine screening status, 40% encouraged office staff to participate in screening, and 16% had a written policy regarding CRC screening. Physicians estimated that they recommend screening to 78% of their patients and that 54% of their patients were actually up-to-date. Discussion of CRC screening was strongly dependent on visit type, with physicians estimating that CRC screening is discussed at 11% of acute visits, 42% of chronic visits, and 87% of health maintenance visits. Several office system factors were associated with a recommendation for screening in a multivariable linear regression model (R = 0.33). Although nearly all physicians felt that they were well informed about American Cancer Society guidelines and tried to follow guidelines for CRC screening, few had office systems to facilitate screening. Physicians would like more time to discuss screening. Office systems likely have the most potential to improve CRC screening among patients attending primary care practices.
    Medical care 10/2008; 46(9 Suppl 1):S103-8. DOI:10.1097/MLR.0b013e31817c6100 · 2.94 Impact Factor
Show more