Nursing resources and patient outcomes in intensive care: A systematic review of the literature

School of Health and Social Care, University of Greenwich, Southwood Site, Avery Hill Road, Eltham, London SE9 2UG, UK.
International journal of nursing studies (Impact Factor: 2.25). 11/2007; 46(7):993-1011. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2007.07.011
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT To evaluate the empirical evidence linking nursing resources to patient outcomes in intensive care settings as a framework for future research in this area.
Concerns about patient safety and the quality of care are driving research on the clinical and cost-effectiveness of health care interventions, including the deployment of human resources. This is particularly important in intensive care where a large proportion of the health care budget is consumed and where nursing staff is the main item of expenditure. Recommendations about staffing levels have been made but may not be evidence based and may not always be achieved in practice.
We searched systematically for studies of the impact of nursing resources (e.g. nurse-patient ratios, nurses' level of education, training and experience) on patient outcomes, including mortality and adverse events, in adult intensive care. Abstracts of articles were reviewed and retrieved if they investigated the relationship between nursing resources and patient outcomes. Characteristics of the studies were tabulated and the quality of the studies assessed.
Of the 15 studies included in this review, two reported a statistical relationship between nursing resources and both mortality and adverse events, one reported an association to mortality only, seven studies reported that they could not reject the null hypothesis of no relationship to mortality and 10 studies (out of 10 that tested the hypothesis) reported a relationship to adverse events. The main explanatory mechanisms were the lack of time for nurses to perform preventative measures, or for patient surveillance. The nurses' role in pain control was noted by one author. Studies were mainly observational and retrospective and varied in scope from 1 to 52 units. Recommendations for future research include developing the mechanisms linking nursing resources to patient outcomes, and designing large multi-centre prospective studies that link patient's exposure to nursing care on a shift-by-shift basis over time.

1 Follower
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Rationale: Little is known about the utility of provision of high-dependency care (HDC) that is in a geographically separate location from a primary intensive care unit (ICU). Objectives: To determine whether the availability of HDC in a geographically separate unit affects patient flow or mortality for critically ill patients. Methods: Admissions to ICUs in the UK, from 2009-2011, who received Level 3 intensive care in the first 24 hours after admission and subsequently Level 2 HDC. We compared differences in patient flow and outcomes for patients treated in hospitals providing some HDC in a geographically separate unit (dual HDC) versus patients treated in hospitals providing all HDC in the same unit as intensive care (integrated HDC) using multi-level mixed effects models. Measurements and Main Results: In 192 adult general ICUs, 21.4% provided dual HDC. Acute hospital mortality was no different for patients cared for in ICUs with dual HDC versus those with integrated HDC (adjusted odds ratio (AOR) 0.94 (0.86-1.03) p=0.16). Dual HDC was associated with a decreased likelihood of a delayed discharge from the primary unit. But, total duration of critical care and the likelihood of discharge from the primary unit at night were increased with dual HDC. Conclusions: Availability of HDC in a geographically separate unit does not impact acute hospital mortality. The potential benefit of decreasing delays in discharge should be weighed against the increased total duration of critical care and greater likelihood of a transfer out of the primary unit at night.
    American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine 12/2014; 191(2). DOI:10.1164/rccm.201408-1525OC · 11.99 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: AimTo compare characteristics of hospitalizations with and without complications and examine the impact of nurse staffing on inpatient complications across different unit types.Background Studies investigating the relationship between nurse staffing and inpatient complications have not shown consistent results. Methodological limitations have been cited as the basis for this lack of uniformity. Our study was designed to address some of these limitations.DesignRetrospective longitudinal hospitalization-level study.Method Adult hospitalizations to high intensity, general medical and general surgical units at three metropolitan tertiary hospitals were included. Data were sourced from Western Australian Department of Health administrative data collections from 2004–2008.We estimated the impact of nurse staffing on inpatient complications adjusted for patient and hospital characteristics and accounted for patients with multiple hospitalizations.ResultsThe study included 256,984 hospitalizations across 58 inpatient units. Hospitalizations with complications had significantly different demographic characteristics compared with those without. The direction of the association between nurse staffing and inpatient complications was not consistent for different inpatient complications, nurse skill mix groups or for hospitalizations with different unit movement patterns.Conclusion Our study design addressed limitations noted in the field, but our results did not support the widely held assumption that improved nurse staffing levels are associated with decreased patient complication rates. Despite a strong international focus on improving nurse staffing to reduce inpatient complications, our results suggest that adding more nurses is not a panacea for reducing inpatient complications to zero.
    Journal of Advanced Nursing 11/2014; DOI:10.1111/jan.12572 · 1.69 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To systematically review the literature on relationships between characteristics of the nurse work environment and five nurse-sensitive patient outcomes in hospitals.
    International Journal of Nursing Studies 01/2015; 290(4). DOI:10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2015.01.005 · 2.25 Impact Factor


Available from
Nov 18, 2014