A developmental-contextual model of couples coping with chronic illness across the adult life span.

Department of Psychology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA.
Psychological Bulletin (Impact Factor: 14.39). 12/2007; 133(6):920-54. DOI: 10.1037/0033-2909.133.6.920
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT A developmental-contextual model of couples coping with chronic illness is presented that views chronic illness as affecting the adjustment of both the patient and the spouse such that coping strategies enacted by the patient are examined in relation to those enacted by the spouse, and vice versa. The developmental model emphasizes that dyadic coping may be different at various phases of the life span, changing temporally at different stages of dealing with the illness as well as unfolding daily as spouses interact around dyadic stressors. In addition, couples engaged in dyadic coping are affected by broad sociocultural factors (culture and gender) as well as more proximal contextual factors (quality of the marital relationship and the specific demands of the chronic illness). The model provides a framework for understanding how couples coping with chronic illness may together appraise and cope with illness during adulthood and for determining when spousal involvement is beneficial or harmful to both patient and spousal adjustment. The developmental-contextual model to dyadic appraisal and coping has numerous research implications for the field, and the authors conclude with specific recommendations for future research.

  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This special issue compiles a series of articles that highlight endeavors to integrate research traditions studying within-person change across years (developmental macro time) and shorter-term within-person processes (micro time). This introduction provides the rationale behind this series, discusses what may be learned from these empirical inquiries, and outlines promises and challenges of these lines of research. We advocate for (a) a conceptual integration of mechanisms linking developmental phenomena across multiple time-scales, (b) theory-based design and sampling plans, and (c) taking into account contextual factors. We conclude that multiple time-scale inquiry provides a toolbox to better understand the human development across adulthood.
    Research in Human Development 05/2014; 11(2):75-90. DOI:10.1080/15427609.2014.906725 · 1.63 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The majority of heart failure (HF) self-care research remains focused on patients, despite the important involvement of family caregivers. Although self-care confidence has been found to play an important role in the effectiveness of HF self-care management on patient outcomes, no known research has examined self-care confidence within a dyadic context. The purpose of this study was to identify individual and dyadic determinants of self-care confidence in HF care dyads. Multilevel modeling, which controls for the interdependent nature of dyadic data, was used to examine 329 Italian HF dyads (caregivers were either spouses or adult children). Both patients and caregivers reported lower-than-adequate levels of confidence, with caregivers reporting slightly higher confidence than patients. Patient and caregiver levels of confidence were significantly associated with greater patient-reported relationship quality and better caregiver mental health. Patient confidence in self-care was significantly associated with patient female gender, nonspousal care dyads, poor caregiver physical health, and low care strain. Caregiver confidence to contribute to self-care was significantly associated with poor emotional quality of life in patients and greater perceived social support by caregivers. Findings are supportive of the need for a dyadic perspective of HF self-care in practice and research as well as the importance of addressing the needs of both members of the dyad to maximize optimal outcomes for both.
    The Journal of cardiovascular nursing 02/2015; DOI:10.1097/JCN.0000000000000234 · 1.81 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Research suggests that optimal couple functioning depends on adopting a "we" orientation to health. Using qualitative data from 20 male couples in which at least one partner was HIV-positive, we examined how couples viewed their health involvement and its relation to social support. One group described their health as highly interconnected; in a second group, at least one partner viewed health as a personal responsibility. Results revealed that there was not a uniform "we" approach toward health; rather, sero-concordance, sero-discordance, and coping with other chronic illnesses strongly contributed to orientations toward health. Orientations toward health were not found to determine social support. © The Author(s) 2015.


Available from