CT urography: definition, indications and techniques. A guideline for clinical practice.

Department of Radiology C-2S, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA, Leiden, The Netherlands.
European Radiology (Impact Factor: 4.34). 02/2008; 18(1):4-17. DOI: 10.1007/s00330-007-0792-x
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The aim was to develop clinical guidelines for multidetector computed tomography urography (CTU) by a group of experts from the European Society of Urogenital Radiology (ESUR). Peer-reviewed papers and reviews were systematically scrutinized. A summary document was produced and discussed at the ESUR 2006 and ECR 2007 meetings with the goal to reach consensus. True evidence-based guidelines could not be formulated, but expert guidelines on indications and CTU examination technique were produced. CTU is justified as a first-line test for patients with macroscopic haematuria, at high-risk for urothelial cancer. Otherwise, CTU may be used as a problem-solving examination. A differential approach using a one-, two- or three-phase protocol is proposed, whereby the clinical indication and the patient population will determine which CTU protocol is employed. Either a combined nephrographic-excretory phase following a split-bolus intravenous injection of contrast medium, or separate nephrographic and excretory phases following a single-bolus injection can be used. Lower dose (CTDIvol 5-6 mGy) is used for benign conditions and normal dose (CTDIvol 9-12 mGy) for potential malignant disease. A low-dose (CTDIvol 2-3 mGy) unenhanced series can be added on indication. The expert-based CTU guidelines provide recommendations to optimize techniques and to unify the radiologist's approach to CTU.

  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: PURPOSE: Prospective protocol optimization, determination of image quality and diagnostic performance of virtual non-enhanced images (VNEI) derived from split-bolus dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) urography in patients with urinary stones. METHODS: IRB-approved, prospective study of 100 patients who, after written informed consent, underwent single-energy, non-enhanced CT and split-bolus, contrast-enhanced DECT (30 + 50 mL of contrast media; combined nephro-urographic acquisition). DECT was performed using setting A (80/140 kVp) in the first 20, and setting B (100/140 kVp) in the second 20 patients. Tin filtration was used in all patients. After a pre-analysis of VNEI quality, 60 additional patients were examined using setting B. Two readers qualitatively and quantitatively determined image quality of all weighted-average DECT images regarding urinary tract opacification (n = 100), and all VNEI regarding quality of iodine subtraction and urinary stone detection (n = 80). True nonenhanced (TNEI) images were the standard of reference for statistical analysis (inter-reader variability and diagnostic performance characteristics). RESULTS: The urinary tract was completely opacified in 94% (94/100) of patients. Iodine subtraction was improved (p < 0.01) and image noise of VNEI was lower (p < 0.05) in DECT setting B. On VNEI, 83% (86/104) of urinary stones were correctly identified and 17% (18/104) were missed. Stones missed (2.5 mm, 1-4) were significantly smaller than stones correctly identified (5 mm, 2-27; p < 0.001). Diagnostic accuracy was 98% on a per-renal-unit basis and 96% on a per-patient basis. Inter-reader agreements were excellent (κ = 0.91-1.00; ICC = 0.86-0.99). CONCLUSIONS: Split-bolus DECT urography was technically feasible and quality of VNEI was improved with the 100/140 kVp setting. Detection of urinary stones <4 mm on VNEI was limited.
    Abdominal Imaging 03/2013; · 1.91 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Die bildgebenden Verfahren stellen bei Patienten mit Verdacht auf Nierenraumforderungen die Hauptsäule der klinischen Diagnostik dar. In den letzten Jahren haben sich enorme Fortschritte erzielen lassen, die eine genaue artdiagnostische Einordnung von Nierenpathologien in der Mehrzahl der Fälle zweifelsfrei erlauben. Nach wie vor ist die Methode der ersten Wahl die Ultraschalluntersuchung, wobei für die Beurteilung von Nierenraumforderungen KM gegeben werden sollte. Die hier vorliegende Arbeit zeigt das Potential dieser Modalität ebenso auf wie neuste Entwicklungen auf dem Gebiet der Mehrzeilencomputertomographie, bei der besonders die sog. „Dual energy-Bildgebung“ hervorzuheben ist – diese hat das Potential zu signifikanter Dosisreduktion und Verbesserung der Charakterisierung von Nierentumoren. Weiterhin kommt die Magnetresonanztomographie bei unklaren Befunden der beiden zuvor genannten Verfahren sowie bei jungen Patienten und bekannter Allergie gegen jodhaltiges KM zum Einsatz. Sie erlaubt mittels hoher Feldstärken, schneller Gradientenmagneten und stark verbesserter Ortsauflösung eine sehr detailgenaue Abbildung von Nierenraumforderungen. Die Lektüre der hier vorliegenden Arbeit soll unseren urologischen Kollegen den Stellenwert der oben genannten Verfahren sowie ihre Indikationen und Kontraindikationen nahebringen; zudem wird eine Übersicht über die wichtigsten Nierenraumforderungen und ihre radiologische Darstellung gegeben.
    Der Urologe 01/2013; 52(4). · 0.46 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: PURPOSE: To evaluate if two-pass dual-energy CT imaging-i.e., simultaneous three-material and two-material decomposition analysis-can depict and characterize urinary stones in various concentrations of iodine solution in vitro. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twelve urinary stones were scanned with a dual-source CT scanner. First, each stone (in a saline-filled tube) underwent single- and dual-energy mode CT scans in order to measure the volume of the stone. Each stone was then placed in various concentrations of contrast medium and scanned in dual-energy mode to calculate its volume via three-material decomposition analysis. Two-pass dual-energy CT imaging analysis software for the Matlab environment, which was developed specifically to process simultaneous three-material and two-material decomposition, was applied to characterize and calculate the volume of each stone. RESULTS: Although the virtual non-contrast images from three-material decomposition analysis clearly visualized all of the stones in contrast medium with up to 80 mgI/mL, the volumes of the uric acid stones were overestimated. Two-pass dual-energy CT imaging was able to depict and characterize non-uric-acid stones in diluted contrast medium with up to 80 mgI/mL, whereas uric acid stones were correctly evaluated in diluted contrast medium with 40 mgI/mL or less. CONCLUSIONS: Two-pass dual-energy CT imaging is able to depict and characterize urinary stones in contrast medium.
    Japanese journal of radiology 05/2013; · 0.73 Impact Factor

Full-text (3 Sources)

Available from
May 15, 2014