ABO(H) blood groups and vascular disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Section of Geriatric Medicine and Section of Public Health and Health Policy, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis (Impact Factor: 5.55). 02/2008; 6(1):62-9. DOI: 10.1111/j.1538-7836.2007.02818.x
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Associations between vascular disease and ABO(H) blood groups have a long history, but no consensus exists regarding its magnitude and significance, or whether it relates to all disorders equally. An accurate calculation of risk would allow direct assessment of whether the effects of non-O status on thrombosis risk are of the magnitude predicted by its effect on von Willebrand factor/FVIII levels.
We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies reporting associations with non-O blood groups. This gave pooled odds ratios of 1.25 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.14-1.36] for myocardial infarction (MI), 1.03 (95% CI 0.89-1.19) for angina, 1.45 (95% CI 1.35-1.56) for peripheral vascular disease, 1.14 (95% CI 1.01-1.27) for cerebral ischemia of arterial origin, and 1.79 (95% CI 1.56 to 2.05) for venous thromboembolism (VTE). However, restriction to prospective MI studies only did not confirm the association (OR 1.01; 95% CI 0.84-1.23), although these studies may have failed to capture early-onset disease. For VTE, using a combined group of OO/A(2)A(2)/A(2)O as index, the combination of A(1)A(1)/A(1)B/BB gave an OR of 2.44 (95% CI 1.79-3.33) and A(1)O/ BO/A(2)B an OR of 2.11 (95% CI 1.66-2.68).
This study confirms the historical impression of linkage between some vascular disorders and non-O blood group status. Although the odds ratios are similar to those predicted by the effect of ABO(H) on von Willebrand factor levels, further work is required to assess risk prospectively and to refine the effect of reducing O(H) antigen expression on thrombosis. However, as non-O and particularly A(1)A(1), A(1)B, BB constitute a significant proportion of the population attributable fraction of VTE, there may be a role for more widespread adoption of ABO(H) typing in testing strategies.

Download full-text


Available from: Peter Clark, Jun 18, 2015
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Elevated levels of FVIII:c are associated with risk for both venous and arterial thromboembolism. However, no population-based study on the sex-specific distribution and reference ranges of plasma FVIII:c and its cardiovascular determinants is available. FVIII:c was analyzed in a randomly selected sample of 2533 males and 2440 females from the Gutenberg Health Study in Germany. Multivariable regression analyses for FVIII:c were performed under adjustment for genetic determinants, cardiovascular risk factors and cardiovascular disease. Females (126.6% (95% CI: 125.2/128)) showed higher FVIII:c levels than males (121.2% (119.8/122.7)). FVIII:c levels increased with age in both sexes (ß per decade: 5.67% (4.22/7.13) male, 6.15% (4.72/7.57) female; p<0.001). Sex-specific reference limits and categories indicating the grade of deviation from the reference were calculated, and nomograms for FVIII:c were created. FVIII:c was approximately 25% higher in individuals with non-O blood type. Adjusted for sex and age, ABO-blood group accounted for 18.3% of FVIII:c variation. In multivariable analysis, FVIII:c was notably positively associated with diabetes mellitus, obesity, hypertension and dyslipidemia and negatively with current smoking. In a fully adjusted multivariable model, the strongest associations observed were of elevated FVIII:c with diabetes and peripheral artery disease in both sexes and with obesity in males. Effects of SNPs in the vWF, STAB2 and SCARA5 gene were stronger in females than in males. The use of nomograms for valuation of FVIII:c might be useful to identify high-risk cohorts for thromboembolism. Additionally, the prospective evaluation of FVIII:c as a risk predictor becomes feasible. Copyright © 2015. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd.
    International journal of cardiology 03/2015; 187:166-174. DOI:10.1016/j.ijcard.2015.03.330 · 6.18 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background Neural tube defects are common major congenital anomalies that result from very early disruption in the development of the brain and spinal cord. Aim of the study We conducted an epidemiological study to determine the impact of some feto-maternal characteristics in the occurrence of NTD subtypes. Methods Characteristics and outcomes of births with NTD and pregnancy characteristics of mothers over a period of twenty years (1991-2011) were recorded in the medical chart. Results From 1991 through 2011, 769 stillborns with NTD were delivered, yielding a prevalence of 2.02/10000. The increase in NTD prevalences over these years was statistically significant (P= 0.000). In addition, differences between prevalences of NTD subtypes over season (P= 0.003) and between genders (P < 0.001) were significant. The highest frequency was noticed in winter with 3, 7 per 10000 births among females. The difference in fetal term between subtypes was significant (P= 0.017). The probability to have a malformed fetus with a weight less than 1500 g was three times higher in myelomeningocele than in craniorachischisis, two times higher in anencephaly and encephalocele, but two times lower than rachischisis. Mothers with one gestation were two fold higher in anencephaly than in encephalocele. Nulliparous mothers cases were significantly more likely to have NTD than uni- or multiparous mothers. O+ mother's blood type presented a significant risk factor and was significantly less common in myelomeningocele than in rachischis, but three times higher than in craniorachischisis. Consanguinity was present in cases with rachischisis and was two times higher than in cases with anencephaly, and three times higher than in cases with encephalocele. In this study, the results have been interpreted with caution due to analyses not being adjusted. Conclusion One of the main findings of the study is that there are many differences between NTD subtypes, which suggests that there may be etiologic differences between subtypes. This suggests that, although epidemiologic studies frequently do not distinguish between NTD subtypes in analyses, they should be analyzed separately when possible.
    Pathology - Research and Practice 12/2014; 210(12). DOI:10.1016/j.prp.2014.06.027 · 1.56 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: In the last years, genome-wide association studies have allowed to identify multiple genetic variants associated with atherosclerosis. In this review, we highlight the identification of genomic variants associated with coronary artery disease and myocardial infarction as well as large-vessel stroke. We will focus on genetic variants that displayed overlap for these atherosclerotic diseases. Current research is focusing on the identification of the functional mechanisms underlying these associations. As frequent variants are often only associated with small increases in risk, the search for the identification of rare variants with large increases in risk is ongoing. Whole-exome sequencing recently revealed rare variants dramatically increasing cardiovascular risk. Taken together, the developments of the past few years light the vision of improved prevention and therapy of coronary artery disease and stroke.
    Current Atherosclerosis Reports 04/2015; 17(4):498. DOI:10.1007/s11883-015-0498-5 · 3.06 Impact Factor