Strategies to better engage, educate, and empower patient compliance and safe lens wear: compliance: what we know, what we do not know, and what we need to know.
ABSTRACT To assess the extent of noncompliant behavior of contact lens wearers and to develop strategies of engaging and educating patients to increase compliance with safe contact lens practices.
The literature regarding noncompliance with medical regimens, contact lens wear, and cleaning was reviewed. One hundred eleven contact lens wearers from a college campus, a dental clinic, and ophthalmology clinics were surveyed in a pilot study regarding their contact lens knowledge, attitudes, and practices. Statistical analysis of the results was performed with SPSS software.
A review of the literature found overall rates of noncompliance with medical regimens varies from 24.8% to 44%, and the rates reported for contact lens wearers varies from 50% to 99%. Noncompliant behavior affecting the safety of contact lenses is more common than behavior affecting lens comfort. This study found that many lens wearers thought they were compliant, but actually reported a wide variety of noncompliant behaviors.
Although there have been remarkable advances in contact lens science, noncompliance with lens-wearing schedules, replacement schedules, and lens care regimens remains a significant problem of contact lens complications and lens failure. Noncompliant behavior is a complex phenomenon that involves knowledge, attitudes and beliefs, and available resources. Data regarding strategies for increasing compliance are scant. Noncompliance must be considered in the development of future lens care products and must be addressed by eye care professionals when patients are fitted with contact lenses and at each follow-up appointment.
- SourceAvailable from: Lyndon W Jones[Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: To evaluate the relationship between compliance with replacement frequency (RF) and contact lens (CL)-related problems in silicone hydrogel (SiHy) wearers. 501 SiHy wearers from seven optometry offices completed surveys regarding their lens wear and any CL related problems which they may have experienced in the preceding 12 months. File review was subsequently conducted at their optometry offices to confirm the information provided. 49% of respondents were wearing 2-week replacement (2WR) and 51% 1-month replacement (1MR) SiHy lenses. 67% wore their lenses for longer than the manufacturers' recommended RF (MRRF) and 60% for longer than their optometrist's recommended RF (ORRF). The mean RF was 2.6× the MRRF for 2WR and 1.5× for 1MR wearers (p<0.001) with median values of 31 and 37 days, respectively. Twenty-three percent reported signs or symptoms consistent with potential complications relating to CL wear. This rate was significantly higher for wearers who were non-compliant with the ORRF than compliant wearers (26% versus 18%, p=0.028). It was also higher for those multipurpose solution users who reported never/almost never rubbing and rinsing their lenses when compared with those who did this every night (29% versus 17%, p=0.007). Two thirds of the SiHy wearers did not comply with the MRRF and 2WR wearers stretched the replacement interval of their lenses to a greater degree than 1MR wearers. Failing to replace lenses when recommended and failing to rub and rinse lenses were associated with a higher rate of patient-reported CL problems.Contact lens & anterior eye: the journal of the British Contact Lens Association 04/2011; 34(5):216-22. DOI:10.1016/j.clae.2011.03.001 · 2.00 Impact Factor
Article: Encourage compliance not complacency[Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: as using solution, storing in a lens case and closing the case tightly, were correctly performed by more than 80% of wearers. However, other areas - too many days of wear, overnight use of lenses prescribed for daily wear, incorrect hand-washing and topping up solutions - had only moderate levels of compliance (40-80%). Napping with lenses, case replacement and case cleaning, and checking expiry dates were associated with high levels of non-compliance (less than 40% compliant).
Conference Paper: Non-invasive ultrasound surgery: role of microbubble enhanced cavitation[Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: A method to make in-vivo acoustic cavitation practical as a mechanism for non-invasive ultrasound surgery is presented. Unlike thermal ablation mechanisms, acoustic cavitation can destroy tissue without heating complex overlying layers. However, cavitation thresholds are widely varying in tissues and cavitation requires high intensities to initiate. We have shown that introducing microbubbles (Optison<sup>TM </sup> ultrasound contrast agent) significantly reduces the threshold for cavitation in canine kidneys. Non-invasive ultrasound surgery of deep-seated tissues may be possible using this approachUltrasonics Symposium, 2000 IEEE; 11/2000