The Adoption and Implementation of an Evidence Based Practice in Child and Family Mental Health Services Organizations: A Pilot Study of Functional Family Therapy in New York State

RAND, 1776 Main St., Santa Monica, CA 90407, USA.
Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research (Impact Factor: 3.44). 04/2008; 35(1-2):38-49. DOI: 10.1007/s10488-007-0145-8
Source: PubMed


Numerous challenges persist in providing evidence-based treatments to children and families in community-based settings. Functional Family Therapy (FFT), one such evidence-based treatment, is a family prevention and intervention program for adolescents with conduct disorder or oppositional defiant disorder. This paper presents pilot data in support of a conceptual framework explaining the adoption and implementation of FFT in a small sample of family and child mental health services organizations in New York State. The conceptual framework is grounded in the diffusion of innovations and the organizational behavior literatures, as well as previously published accounts of the adoption and implementation of evidence-based treatments in mental health. Pilot study data demonstrated that factors associated with the adoption of FFT included: The program fitting with the mission of the organization, as well as the organization having a strong interest in evidence-based treatments. Once a decision to adopt FFT was made, the degree to which it fit with organizational characteristics (e.g., available resource sets, organizational structure, and culture) influenced the ease with which it was implemented. Implications for the adoption and implementation of other evidence-based treatments are discussed.

Download full-text


Available from: Kimberly Eaton Hoagwood, Feb 19, 2014
  • Source
    • "Similarly, an implementation study of Functional Family Therapy (FFT) included two years of counselor training and weekly consultation using a conceptual framework of adoption of innovations with attention to the complex influences on implementation [9]. Some clinicians, however, had difficulty accepting the model and wanted to provide additional services [9]. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background Adaptations to evidence-based substance abuse treatment programs may impact their effectiveness. A qualitative study of MET/CBT-5 implementation in community agencies treating adolescents found that the majority of the agencies made adaptations and that the most frequent adaptation was to provide more than five treatment sessions. Methods Baseline and outcome data from SAMHSA’s Effective Adolescent Treatment demonstration were analyzed to assess associations between length of treatment, client characteristics, and outcomes at three months. Results Adolescents who received more or less than the protocol length of 5 sessions were less likely to be discharged to the community than those who received the 5 session protocol. Those who received more than five sessions were more likely to have higher severity scores at intake but almost 50% of those with more than five sessions had low intake severity scores. Clients who received less than five sessions tended to have lower severity scores than clients who received more than five sessions. Conclusions Length of treatment tended to vary by site rather than severity of substance problems or frequency of use. There was no significant improvement of substance abuse problems or decrease in frequency of use with longer treatment. Implementation of the MET/CBT-5 component of the Cannabis Youth Treatment trial in the EAT project illustrates the difficulty of adherence to an evidence based protocol in the field.
    Substance Abuse Treatment Prevention and Policy 08/2012; 7(1):35. DOI:10.1186/1747-597X-7-35 · 1.16 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "To shed light on the prevalence of counselor training in several EBPs in US substance abuse treatment centers, this study uses data from the 2007–2008 wave of the National Treatment Center Study (NTCS), a dataset containing information on training activities from a nationally representative sample of 345 privately funded treatment centers in the US. The NTCS goes beyond prior studies that only surveyed a small number of directors and asked about broad EBP implementation rather than specific approaches (e.g., Zazzali et al., 2008). Directors of all centers were asked questions about the level and type of training they provide their counselors in several EBPs, including cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT), contingency management (CM), motivational interviewing (MI), and brief strategic family therapy (BSFT). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Given that most addiction counselors enter the field unprepared to implement psychosocial evidence-based practices (EBPs), surprisingly little is known about the extent to which substance abuse treatment centers provide their counselors with formal training in these treatments. This study examines the extent of formal training that treatment centers provide their counselors in cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT), motivational interviewing (MI), contingency management (CM), and brief strategic family therapy (BSFT). Face-to-face interviews with 340 directors of a nationally representative sample of privately funded US substance abuse treatment centers. Although a substantial number of treatment centers provide their counselors with formal training in EBPs that they use with their clients, coverage is far from complete. For example, of those centers that use CBT, 34% do not provide their counselors with any formal training in CBT (either initially or annually), and 61% do not provide training in CBT that includes supervised training cases. Sizable training gaps exist for MI, CM, and BSFT as well. The large training gaps found in this study give rise to concerns regarding the integrity with which CBT, MI, CM, and BSFT are being delivered by counselors in private US substance abuse treatment centers. Future research should examine the generalizability of our findings to other types of treatment centers (e.g., public) and to the implementation of other EBPs.
    Drug and alcohol dependence 08/2011; 120(1-3):149-54. DOI:10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2011.07.017 · 3.42 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "An extensive services research literature describes the multitude of factors influencing implementation, including characteristics of the intervention, adopters/providers, the organization, as well the surrounding macro systems (Durlak and DuPre 2008; Glisson 2002; Mendel et al. 2008; Zazzali et al. 2008). As the relatively young field of implementation science advances, researchers have more recently applied this knowledge to facilitate the successful implementation of mental health treatment for children (Glisson and Schoenwald 2005; Schoenwald 2008; Schoenwald et al. 2008) and families (Zazzali et al. 2008). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Listening Visits (LV), an empirically supported depression treatment delivered by non mental health specialists, were implemented into two distinctly structured programs. The relative importance of providers’ views and organizational context on implementation were examined. Thirty-seven home visitors completed pre- and post-LV training surveys assessing their views toward implementing LV. Implementation rates markedly differed in the two organizations (73.9% vs. 35.7%). Logistic regression results showed that when predicting the implementation rate, the impact of the organizational setting outweighed home visitors’ personal views. These results underscore the importance of organizational context in the implementation of empirically supported treatments. KeywordsDepression treatment–Implementation–Views–Organizational context
    Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research 05/2011; 39(3):180-186. DOI:10.1007/s10488-011-0345-0 · 3.44 Impact Factor
Show more