A high-content glucocorticoid receptor translocation assay for compound mechanism-of-action evaluation.

Bristol-Myers Squibb, Lead Discovery & Profiling, Wallingford, Connecticut 06492, USA.
Journal of Biomolecular Screening (Impact Factor: 2.01). 01/2008; 12(8):1029-41. DOI: 10.1177/1087057107309353
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Ligand-induced cytoplasm to nucleus translocation is a critical event in the nuclear receptor (NR) signal transduction cascade. The development of green fluorescent proteins and their color variants fused with NRs, along with the recent developments in automated cellular imaging technologies, has provided unique tools to monitor and quantify the NR translocation events. These technology developments have important implications in the mechanistic evaluation of NR signaling and provide a powerful tool for drug discovery. The unique challenges for developing a robust NR translocation assay include cytotoxicity accompanied with chronic overexpression of NRs, basal translocation induced by serum present in culture medium, and interference from endogenous NRs, as well as subcellular dynamics. The authors have developed a robust assay system for the glucocorticoid receptor (GR) that was applied to a panel of nuclear receptor ligands. Using a high-content imaging system, ligand-induced, dose-dependent GR nuclear translocation was quantified and a correlation with other conventional assays established.

Download full-text


Available from: Taosheng Chen, Aug 21, 2015
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Recent studies have shown that estrogens promote the growth of lung cancer cells and may potentially be responsible for increased susceptibility to lung cancer in women. These observations raise the possibility of using antiestrogens in treating and preventing lung cancer. However, it is not clear how estrogen receptors (ERs) modulate the growth of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) cells. Our Western blotting and real-time PCR analysis showed that NSCLC cells expressed ERbeta, but not ERalpha. In addition, ERbeta-specific ligands, but not ERalpha-specific ligands, promoted the growth of lung cancer cells. Furthermore, knockdown of ERbeta by short hairpin RNA constructs resulted in loss of estrogen-dependent growth of lung cancer cells. Interestingly, endogenous ERbeta failed to transcriptionally activate estrogen response element (ERE)-luciferase constructs in NSCLC cells, suggesting a lack of genomic function. Upon further investigation, ERbeta was found to be in the cytoplasm in all lung cancer cells and failed to translocate to the nucleus in the presence of estrogen, as observed by biochemical, ArrayScan, and confocal microscopy experiments. Nonetheless, estrogen caused rapid activation of cAMP, Akt, and MAPK signaling pathways in lung cancer cells. Immunohistochemical analysis of lung tumor biopsies showed strong ERbeta staining in the cytoplasm, whereas no staining was observed for ERalpha. In conclusion, our results suggest that that proliferative effects of estrogen in lung cancer cells is mediated primarily, if not exclusively, by the nongenomic action of ERbeta.
    Molecular Endocrinology 02/2009; 23(2):146-56. DOI:10.1210/me.2008-0431 · 4.20 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background: High-content screening (HCS) defines a series of cell-based multiparametric approaches for analysis at the single-cell level. In recent years, HCS has been increasingly pursued in the drug discovery field, adding to the repertoire of assay type, or increasing throughput in applications such as compound screening and mechanism of action studies, as well as for target identification/validation (siRNA screening). Obviously, as cells represent the objects of high-content assays, the outcome of any HCS assay is determined by the cell type: the choice of the most suitable cellular model for a given assay is a critical step that must follow biological and technical criteria. Method: Here, I discuss these criteria and report a systematic survey of cell types used so far in HCS, with particular emphasis on their strengths and drawbacks. I also illustrate my expectations for future advances on cellular models used in HCS. Conclusion: Despite the plethora of cell types potentially suitable for HCS, so far only a handful of cellular models (particularly human cancer cell lines) account for the great majority of HCS assays. In the future, the introduction of novel cell types, including engineered and primary cells, will further expand the potential of HCS for systems biology and drug discovery.
    Expert Opinion on Drug Discovery 06/2009; 4(6):643-657. DOI:10.1517/17460440902992870 · 3.47 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: In order to identify potential cytochrome P-450 3A4 (drug-metabolizing enzyme) inducers at an early stage of the drug discovery process, a cell-based transactivation high-throughput luciferase reporter assay for the human pregnane X receptor (PXR) in HepG2 cells has been implemented and multiplexed with a viability end point for data interpretation, as part of a Lead Profiling portfolio of assays. As a routine part of Lead Profiling operations, assays are periodically evaluated for utility as well as for potential improvements in technology or process. We used a recent evaluation of our PXR-transactivation assay as a model for the application of Lean Thinking-based process analysis to lab-bench assay optimization and automation. This resulted in the development of a 384-well multiplexed homogeneous assay simultaneously detecting PXR transactivation and HepG2 cell cytotoxicity. In order to multiplex fluorescent and luminescent read-outs, modifications to each assay were necessary, which included optimization of multiple assay parameters such as cell density, plate type, and reagent concentrations. Subsequently, a set of compounds including known cytotoxic compounds and PXR inducers were used to validate the multiplexed assay. Results from the multiplexed assay correlate well with those from the singleplexed assay formats measuring PXR transactivation and viability separately. Implementation of the multiplexed assay for routine compound profiling provides improved data quality, sample conservation, cost savings, and resource efficiencies.
    Assay and Drug Development Technologies 07/2009; 7(3):294-303. DOI:10.1089/adt.2008.184 · 2.08 Impact Factor
Show more