Article

Effects of child formula dentifrices on artificial caries like lesions using in vitro pH-cycling: preliminary results.

School of Dentistry and Oral Health, Griffith University, Qld, Australia.
International Dental Journal (Impact Factor: 1.04). 10/2007; 57(5):307-13. DOI: 10.1111/j.1875-595X.2007.tb00138.x
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT To compare the remineralisation effects of different child dentifrices on primary teeth.
In vitro single-section technique and pH-cycling model.
Primary teeth were painted with nail varnish, leaving a 1 mm wide window before placing in demineralising solution for 96hr to produce artificial carious lesions 150-200 microm deep. Teeth were longitudinally cut into approximately 100-150 microm thick sections and assigned to three groups (n = 7). Sections in Group A were exposed to Perioe Children's Toothpaste (LG, Korea), Group B to Colgate Pokemon (Colgate-Palmolive, Thailand) and Group C to Vicco (Vicco Laboratories, India). Polarised light microscopy and microradiography was used to evaluate lesion depth, before and after 7 days pH cycle.
Mean lesion depths in Groups A and C increased by 11% and 14% respectively, while Group B demonstrated a lesion reduction of 3%. Comparisons using ANOVA and Student-Newman-Keuls tests showed that Groups A and C were significantly different from Group B (p < 0.05), but there was no significant difference between Groups A and C.
Based on the data obtained, Colgate Pokemon remineralised initial carious lesions. In addition, when compared to Colgate Pokemon, Perioe Children's Toothpaste failed to show 'healing' efficacy even though it is claimed to contain fluoride.

1 Bookmark
 · 
101 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The aim of the following study is to know the efficacy of remineralization of two pediatric dentifrices and one regular dentifrice on artificial carious lesions in primary teeth.
    Journal of International Society of Preventive & Community Dentistry. 05/2014; 4(2):96-102.
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The ADA recommends the use of fluoridated dentifrices as soon as the primary teeth erupt, so as to reduce the incidence of dental caries. However young children can ingest a significant amount of dentifrice during normal toothbrushing; this is a potential problem because the permanent teeth are at risk from fluorosis for the first seven years of life. the objective of this paper was to review the literature on the role of fluoride dentifrices in causing dental fluorosis. Search strategy: a search for literature was performed using MEDLINE, OVID with the key words fluorosis, dentifrice, ingestion, and children. The search was limited to English language publications. Subsequently, 31 articles were retrieved, additional relevant articles were collected from the references cited in the initially identified papers. Ultimately, 96 articles were retrieved for review. Fluoride, should be used with caution so that the benefits out-way the adverse affects. Oral health care providers need to systematically assess individual tooth brushing habits and emphasize the advantages of early use of a fluoridated dentifrice whilst still meeting the need for the prudent use of small quantities of dentifrice. Dentifrices with a low concentration of fluoride may be appropriate for young children who are considered to be at low caries risk and the risk of fluorosis is minimal for children who ingest this dentifrice; nevertheless, it appears that more research is still required on the therapeutic effects of fluoride dentifrices which contain fluoride at a low concentration.
    The Journal of clinical pediatric dentistry 01/2011; 36(2):111-21. · 0.34 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Despite a plethora of in situ studies and clinical trials evaluating the efficacy of fluoridated dentifrices on caries control, in vitro pH cycling models are still broadly used because they mimic the dynamics of mineral loss and gain involved in caries formation. This paper critically reviews the current literature on existing pH-cycling models for the in vitro evaluation of the efficacy of fluoridated dentifrices for caries control, focusing on their strengths and limitations. A search was undertaken in the MEDLINE electronic journal database using the keywords "pH-cycling", "demineralization", "remineralization", "in vitro", "fluoride", "dentifrice". The primary outcome was the decrease of demineralization or the increase of remineralization as measured by different methods (e.g.: transverse microradiography) or tooth fluoride uptake. Inclusion of studies, data extraction and quality assessment were undertaken independently and in duplicate by two members of the review team. Disagreements were solved by discussion and consensus or by a third party. One hundred and sixteen studies were included, of which 42 addressed specifically the comparison of dentifrices using different pH-cycling models. The other studies included meta-analysis or reviews, data about the effect of different fluoride sources on de-remineralization, different methods for analysis de-remineralization and chemical variables and characteristics of dental hard tissues that might have influence on de-remineralization processes. Generally, the studies presented ability to detect known results established by clinical trials, to demonstrate dose-related responses in the fluoride content of the dentifrices, and to provide repeatability and reproducibility between tests. In order to accomplish these features satisfactorily, it is mandatory to take into account the type of substrate and baseline artificial lesion, as well as the adequate response variables and statistical approaches to be used. This critical review of literature showed that the currently available pH-cycling models are appropriate to detect dose-response and pH-response of fluoride dentifrices, and to evaluate the impact of new active principles on the effect of fluoridated dentifrices, as well as their association with other anti-caries treatments.
    Journal of applied oral science: revista FOB 08/2010; 18(4):316-34. · 0.39 Impact Factor