Article

Effects of ingesting protein with various forms of carbohydrate following resistance-exercise on substrate availability and markers of anabolism, catabolism, and immunity.

Exercise & Sport Nutrition Lab, Center for Exercise, Nutrition and Preventive Health, Baylor University, Waco, TX, USA. .
Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition (Impact Factor: 1.5). 11/2007; 4:18. DOI: 10.1186/1550-2783-4-18
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Ingestion of carbohydrate (CHO) and protein (PRO) following intense exercise has been reported to increase insulin levels, optimize glycogen resynthesis, enhance PRO synthesis, and lessen the immuno-suppressive effects of intense exercise. Since different forms of CHO have varying glycemic effects, the purpose of this study was to determine whether the type of CHO ingested with PRO following resistance-exercise affects blood glucose availability and insulin levels, markers of anabolism and catabolism, and/or general immune markers.
40 resistance-trained subjects performed a standardized resistance training workout and then ingested in a double blind and randomized manner 40 g of whey PRO with 120 g of sucrose (S), honey powder (H), or maltodextrin (M). A non-supplemented control group (C) was also evaluated. Blood samples were collected prior to and following exercise as well as 30, 60, 90, and 120 min after ingestion of the supplements. Data were analyzed by repeated measures ANOVA or ANCOVA using baseline values as a covariate if necessary.
Glucose concentration 30 min following ingestion showed the H group (7.12 +/- 0.2 mmol/L) to be greater than S (5.53 +/- 0.6 mmol/L; p < 0.03); M (6.02 +/- 0.8 mmol/L; p < 0.05), and C (5.44 +/- 0.18 mmol/L; p < 0.0002) groups. No significant differences were observed among groups in glucose area under the curve (AUC) values, although the H group showed a trend versus control (p = 0.06). Insulin response for each treatment was significant by time (p < 0.0001), treatment (p < 0.0001) and AUC (p < 0.0001). 30-min peak post-feeding insulin for S (136.2 +/- 15.6 uIU/mL), H (150.1 +/- 25.39 uIU/mL), and M (154.8 +/- 18.9 uIU/mL) were greater than C (8.7 +/- 2.9 uIU/mL) as was AUC with no significant differences observed among types of CHO. No significant group x time effects were observed among groups in testosterone, cortisol, the ratio of testosterone to cortisol, muscle and liver enzymes, or general markers of immunity.
CHO and PRO ingestion following exercise significantly influences glucose and insulin concentrations. Although some trends were observed suggesting that H maintained blood glucose levels to a better degree, no significant differences were observed among types of CHO ingested on insulin levels. These findings suggest that each of these forms of CHO can serve as effective sources of CHO to ingest with PRO in and attempt to promote post-exercise anabolic responses.

0 Bookmarks
 · 
155 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This study analysed the influence of maltodextrin ingestion before and during a single bout of resistance exercise on muscle damage and catabolic/anabolic hormone responses. Seven young men previously trained in resistance exercises performed two sessions each comprising ten exercises for the upper limbs, accompanied by ingestion of a solution containing 8% carbohydrate or placebo. Blood samples were obtained before and after training for analysis of insulin, cortisol and creatine kinase, and during the training period (after the second, fourth, sixth, eighth and tenth exercise) for glucose analysis. At all time-points, glucose was found to be significantly higher following ingestion of carbohydrate. Although the training led to an increase in cortisol, no differences were noted between the carbohydrate and placebo sessions. However, the levels of insulin after training were approximately three times higher following ingestion of carbohydrate (28.7 ± 3 μU/ml) than following ingestion of placebo (9.5 ± 2.2 μU/ml, p <0.05. We conclude that carbohydrate ingestion before and during resistance exercises does not affect catabolic activity, but provides an important anabolic muscle stimulus.
    Sport Sciences for Health 05/2012; 7(2-3).
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: One of the most important effects of strength training is muscular hypertrophy. Athletes should optimize their nutritional management in order to compensate their own genetic limitations. The aim of this review is to analyze the scientific evidence concerning protein intake as a tool to achieve muscle hypertrophy. Depending on the expenditure and energy intake of athlete, a daily protein ranging between 10–15% of total dietary intake is needed. However in sports diets, it is preferable to estimate the amount of protein needed per kilogram of body weight in each individual. In this regard athletes should ingest an amount between 1.2 g and 1.8 g of proteins/kg of body mass/day to maintain their lean mass. In order to increase muscle mass (0.5 kg/week), athletes should take between 1.6 g and 1.8 g of protein/kg/day with an increase of 400–500 kcal in their daily diet. These needs will depend on the sport, muscular catabolic status, the athlete's lean mass and glycogen stores. Protein needs will increase if muscle and liver glycogen stores are empty. Excess of protein intake (more than 2 g/kg/day), with full glycogen stores, does not benefit the athlete and could cause an increase in circulating ketones and urea, thereby producing an early dehydration.
    Revista Española de Nutrición Humana y Dietética. 01/2012; 16(1):25–35.
  • Source
    J Sports Med Doping Stud. 01/2013; 3(130):2161-0673.1000130.

Full-text (2 Sources)

Download
33 Downloads
Available from
May 21, 2014